Connect with us

Analysis

Cash is King: How Asian Airlines’ Liquidity Hoarding During the 2026 Oil Shock Will Make Them Stronger | Aviation Analysis

Published

on

The Fuel Shock That Rewrites the Rules

There is a particular kind of clarity that arrives only in a genuine crisis. Not the manufactured urgency of quarterly earnings calls, not the performative alarm of airline investor days — but the cold, existential arithmetic of an industry staring at a cost structure that has been torn apart in a matter of weeks.

Jet fuel, the single most volatile line item on any airline’s balance sheet, has more than doubled in the month since the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran began, surpassing $195 a barrel as a global average. Foreign Policy For context: the refining spread alone — the premium of processed jet fuel over crude — surged to as high as $144 per barrel before easing to around $65, still far above anything considered normal. Modern Diplomacy Benchmark Brent crude has settled between $100 and $115. But that, as Foreign Policy noted this week, is not the number that matters. What matters is what actually goes into the wing tanks.

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran has effectively severed nearly 21% of global jet fuel supply Travel And Tour World — a chokepoint through which a significant share of Middle Eastern refined product passes on its way to Asia’s thirsty aviation hubs. The ripple effects have been immediate: Jet A-1 prices have surged from around $80 per barrel to approximately $220 per barrel Nation Thailand, compressing airline margins to the point where, for carriers flying on pre-crisis booking revenues, every departure is potentially loss-making.

And yet, if you look carefully beneath the screaming headlines, something strategically interesting is happening among Asia’s major carriers. A quiet, disciplined, and — dare I say it — admirable act of financial self-preservation is underway. Call it what it is: a masterclass in crisis liquidity management.


How the 2026 Shock Compares to the 1973 and 1980s Crises

The historical echoes are not merely rhetorical. Chai Eamsiri, the President and CEO of Thai Airways International — a man who has navigated nearly four decades of aviation cycles — did not mince words when assessing what his industry is now facing. “This is the worst one,” he told journalists. “This time is about the infrastructure that was destroyed. It will take some time to call back all the supply, the facilities, the refinery, the infrastructure.” Free Malaysia Today

He is right to reach for historical superlatives, and the comparison demands unpacking.

The 1973 OPEC embargo and the 1979–1980 second oil shock were demand-destruction events rooted in cartel politics. Airlines of that era operated with none of today’s financial sophistication — no fuel hedging programs, no dynamic pricing algorithms, no diversified revenue streams from cargo or ancillaries. Pan American World Airways, Braniff International, and Laker Airways entered those shocks with high debt, aging fleets, and zero liquidity buffers. The results were catastrophic: Braniff filed for bankruptcy in 1982; Laker collapsed the same year; Pan Am began its long death spiral.

The 2026 shock differs structurally. Most airline hedging programs are tied to crude oil benchmarks, not to the refined jet fuel that actually goes into aircraft — a critical structural weakness exposed by this crisis. Modern Diplomacy When refining margins spike as they have now, even well-hedged carriers face significant exposure. But the key difference between 2026 and 1980 is this: today’s Asian flag carriers have cash. Meaningful, fortress-grade cash — built up deliberately through post-COVID restructuring, equity raises, and restrained capital allocation. And they know exactly how to use it.


The Liquidity Fortress: Carrier-by-Carrier Case Studies

Thai Airways: The THB 120 Billion Shield

Thai Airways International has moved into cash-saving mode, with CEO Chai Eamsiri confirming the airline has begun delaying non-essential investment plans and tightening spending to preserve as much as possible of its existing THB 120 billion (approximately $3.3 billion) cash position. Nation Thailand

See also  CBDCs vs Stablecoins: 5 Key Differences in 2025

The discipline is surgical rather than panicked. Consider what Thai Airways is not cutting: its fleet expansion from 80 to 102 aircraft by year-end 2026, new routes including Bangkok–Amsterdam (a comeback after 28 years) and Bangkok–Auckland, and the THB 10 billion MRO centre at U-Tapao Airport — all remain on schedule. KAOHOON INTERNATIONAL What is being deferred is the discretionary: onboard equipment upgrades, non-critical vendor contracts, premature hedging at punishing spot prices. Thai Airways has already locked in approximately 50% of its fuel requirements through June 2026 but has opted not to hedge further, judging the volatility too high to add new positions at current elevated prices. KAOHOON INTERNATIONAL

This is not a sign of weakness. It is a sign of a CFO who understands that locking in $195/barrel fuel in a crisis environment is a trap, not a solution.

Singapore Airlines and Scoot: Hedging Sophistication Meets Commercial Discipline

Singapore Airlines is regarded as operating one of the more robust fuel hedging programmes in the Asia-Pacific region, providing meaningful protection against the refined jet fuel price surge. TTG Asia Scoot, its low-cost subsidiary, has deployed what its Vice President for Pricing described as a combination of fuel hedging, selective fare increases, and commercial capacity discipline Nation Thailand — a three-pronged response that reflects the parent group’s institutional risk management culture.

Critically, Singapore’s government delayed a sustainable aviation fuel levy that airlines were scheduled to start paying in May 2026, citing the surge in fuel costs from the Iran war — with the charge now deferred to October 1, 2026. Bloomberg This is sovereign-level recognition that preserving airline liquidity during the shock window is a national economic priority, not merely a commercial accommodation.

Cathay Pacific: Surcharges as a Cash Generation Engine

Cathay Pacific doubled its fuel surcharges on all tickets from March 18, 2026, with the airline stating that jet fuel has approximately doubled since the start of the Middle East crisis. LoyaltyLobby The surcharge mechanism is, in effect, a real-time cash flow transfer from demand-inelastic travellers to the carrier’s operating account — elegant, legally defensible, and brutally effective. By April 1, Cathay had raised fuel surcharges a further 34% Gulf News, a move that signals confidence in its ability to pass costs through without material load factor destruction.

AirAsia X: Managed Contraction, Not Collapse

AirAsia X has raised fares by up to 40% and imposed a 20% fuel surcharge, while cutting approximately 10% of flights — targeting non-profitable exploratory routes rather than core network services. Malay Mail Group CEO Bo Lingam has been explicit: the carrier is “optimising its fleet without resorting to staff reductions.” AirAsia X carries no fuel hedges, leaving it fully exposed to spot market prices The Edge Malaysia — a vulnerability, certainly, but one being managed through aggressive yield management rather than capacity capitulation.


The Great Hedging Divide: Asia Versus the West

Here is where the conventional narrative gets genuinely interesting. Much commentary has focused on European carriers’ superior hedging positions as evidence of Western operational sophistication. European airlines have on average hedged around 80% of their 2026 fuel requirements, with Ryanair holding the strongest position at 84% of the current quarter locked in at $77 per barrel. AeroTime

But here is the structural irony that almost every competitor publication has missed: those hedges are front-loaded and thinning. Coverage thins as the year progresses AeroTime, meaning European carriers’ apparent advantage evaporates precisely as the shock, if prolonged, bites deepest — in Q3 and Q4 2026. Lufthansa, hedged at 82% for the current quarter and 77% for the rest of 2026, has halted all new fuel hedging activities AeroTime, a tacit admission that the forward market has become too expensive and too uncertain to navigate confidently.

See also  Why Economists Are Raising the US Economic Outlook for 2026 Above 2% Despite Trumponomics

Meanwhile, the structural weakness that hedge programs tied to crude oil benchmarks expose means that in extreme market conditions, even well-hedged airlines remain vulnerable Modern Diplomacy to the refining spread explosion — which is precisely what has occurred. The jet fuel hedging market is thin, expensive, and insufficient for absorbing a shock of this magnitude.

The Asian carriers who are building cash buffers, cutting capacity precisely where unit economics break, and deferring discretionary capex — rather than betting on futures markets — may emerge from this crisis with balance sheets that are, paradoxically, stronger than peers who spent aggressively on hedging infrastructure.


The Macro Ripple: Asian Tourism and the Regional Economic Calculus

The aviation liquidity crisis is not occurring in a vacuum. It is unfolding against a regional tourism backdrop that was, until February 2026, one of the most compelling growth stories in global travel economics.

Thailand’s 2026 tourism season began with strong momentum, with early-year arrivals topping 7 million visitors in the first months — before geopolitical tension slowed weekly growth. Chiang Rai Times The medium-term danger is not the short-haul regional market, which tends to be resilient to fuel shocks given shorter flight times and lower absolute fuel burn per seat. It is the long-haul leisure segment — Europe to Bangkok, Australia to Bali, the transatlantic Asian diaspora flows — where reduced flight frequency and higher fares could put significant pressure on hundreds of thousands of visitor arrivals, with revenue losses estimated in the tens of billions of baht Chiang Rai Times if the crisis persists past Q2.

The carriers that preserve cash through this window are not merely surviving for their own sakes. They are the arterial infrastructure of tourism-dependent economies across Southeast Asia, South Asia, and Northeast Asia. An airline that runs out of liquidity does not merely disappear from a stock exchange — it removes a country from the global route map. The geopolitical stakes of airline liquidity management are, in this sense, considerably higher than most financial commentary acknowledges.


Five Strategic Moves That Define the 2026 Winners

The data across this crisis reveals a clear behavioral taxonomy that will separate aviation’s resilient performers from its casualties. The carriers executing all five of the following actions are, in my assessment, the ones to watch for the 2027 recovery:

1. Fortress Cash, Not Fire Sales: Preserving liquidity buffers in excess of six months of operating costs rather than deploying cash into opportunistic asset acquisitions. Thai Airways’ THB 120 billion reserve is the archetype.

2. Selective Capex Preservation: Distinguishing between strategic investments (fleet renewal, MRO infrastructure, digital systems) and discretionary spending. The carriers cutting AI investment and technology programs will pay a competitive price in 2027–28.

3. Revenue Yield Over Capacity Vanity: Accepting lower seat counts at higher yields rather than defending market share with cheap, loss-generating inventory. AirAsia X’s fare hikes of up to 40% — paired with a 10% capacity cut — reflects this discipline.

4. Hedging Agnosticism at the Peak: Refusing to layer new hedge positions at $195/barrel spot prices. As Thai Airways CFO reasoning shows, hedging during a crisis peak locks in losses rather than protecting against them.

5. Government Partnership Activation: Working with civil aviation authorities on fuel surcharge frameworks and levy deferrals — as Singapore’s CAAS demonstrated — to distribute the cost shock across the value chain rather than absorbing it entirely on the airline’s income statement.


What This Means for the 2027 Recovery

Let me be direct: the 2026 oil shock will end. Every previous shock in aviation history — 1973, 1979, 1990, 2008 — resolved, eventually, through some combination of supply restoration, demand destruction, political settlement, or technological substitution. CEO Chai Eamsiri himself noted that U.S. midterm elections in November 2026 create a political incentive structure that could influence conflict resolution timelines. Nation Thailand

See also  China's Property Woes Could Last Until 2030—Despite Beijing's Best Censorship Efforts

CLSA’s analysis forecasts Singapore Airlines’ FY27 core net profit declining 30% year-on-year due to the jet fuel surge, but projects FY28 profits unchanged on the assumption of oil price normalization and gradual fare adjustments — with dividend yield expected to recover to 4.8% in FY28. Minichart

The carriers that will capture disproportionate market share in that normalization window are precisely those that did not panic-sell routes, did not dilute equity at distressed prices, did not gut their technology and workforce infrastructure in a short-sighted cost-cutting frenzy. The Asian airlines building liquidity fortresses today are positioning themselves to be the aggressive fleet-deployers and route-expanders of 2027 — when fuel prices ease, pent-up demand unleashes, and weakened competitors have neither the aircraft nor the operational capacity to respond.

This is the contrarian insight that most aviation commentary — fixated on the immediate pain — is missing entirely. The 1980s crisis eliminated Pan Am, Braniff, and Laker. But it also created the conditions under which a disciplined Singapore Airlines, flush with government-backed capital and operational conservatism, spent the subsequent decade cementing itself as the world’s most admired full-service carrier. History, as ever, rewards the patient.


The Verdict: Discipline as Competitive Moat

The IATA forecast of $41 billion industry profit for 2026, made at the end of 2025, now seems unattainable. The Conversation That is certain. What is less certain — and far more interesting — is which carriers emerge from this shock with durable competitive advantages rather than merely surviving it.

My assessment: Singapore Airlines and Thai Airways, both of which entered 2026 with restructured balance sheets, cash reserves, and clear strategic frameworks for navigating fuel volatility, are the strongest positioned for 2027 recovery. Cathay Pacific’s aggressive surcharge strategy preserves revenue integrity without destroying demand. AirAsia X’s managed contraction — painful but rational — keeps the network intact for the eventual bounce.

The carriers I worry about most are those without hedges, without cash buffers, and without the cost-discipline culture that turns a crisis into a competitive sorting mechanism. The airlines most likely to fail are those with weak balance sheets, low operational efficiency, no state backing, and little or no fuel hedging, leaving them fully exposed to sharp cost rises. The Conversation

Cash, as every Asian airline CFO is now demonstrating with unusual clarity, is not merely a financial metric. It is a strategic weapon. And in the worst oil shock since the 1980s, the carriers who hoarded it most ruthlessly will be the ones defining Asian aviation’s next decade.

The headlines say crisis. The balance sheets say opportunity.


Inline Citations and Sources

  1. Foreign Policy — “Jet Fuel Prices Spell Bad News for Iran War Energy Crisis”
  2. The Nation Thailand — “Thai Airways board to weigh crisis measures as oil surge hits costs”
  3. The Nation Thailand — “THAI enters cash-saving mode as fuel costs soar”
  4. Bloomberg — “Singapore Delays Flight Tax as Oil Crisis Lifts Jet Prices”
  5. Aerotime Hub — “Airline fuel hedging: who is protected in Iran’s fuel crisis”
  6. The Conversation — “Airlines are facing yet more turbulence — expert assesses what they need to get through it”
  7. The Edge Malaysia — “High jet fuel costs threaten airline recovery”
  8. Malay Mail — “AirAsia X raises fares by up to 40pc, cuts some flights”
  9. Minichart — “Singapore Airlines Earnings Outlook 2026–2027: Impact of Iran War”
  10. TTG Asia — “Asian carriers cancel flights, implement surcharges as fuel crisis intensifies”

Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Analysis

China Economy 2026: Export Growth Masks Manufacturing Overcapacity

Published

on

China’s exports have been the good-news story in an otherwise mixed economic picture. They’re not just holding up; through the first four months of 2026 they were running about 14% to 15% above the same period a year earlier, according to figures cited by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission and Vanguard’s economic outlook. That’s the kind of number that would normally signal a healthy economy. The complication is what’s happening underneath it.

A growth model showing its age

Manufacturing capacity utilization fell to 73.9% in early 2026 — near a decade low outside of the pandemic shutdowns, per the Commission’s bulletin. That’s the tell. China is producing and shipping more, but a growing share of its industrial base is running under capacity, which points to a structural mismatch: the country’s manufacturing engine has outgrown both its domestic consumption and, increasingly, what the rest of the world is willing to absorb without pushback.

Goldman Sachs Research, in a report cited by Goldman Sachs’ own analysis, forecasts 4.8% real GDP growth for 2026 — above consensus expectations of 4.5% — driven substantially by continued export strength and a softening drag from the property downturn. But that same report flags the labor market as a genuine weak spot: hiring, measured across a weighted average of PMI employment sub-indexes, is at its most depressed level in a decade outside Covid, and urban nominal wage growth slowed to just 3.8% year-on-year in Q3 2025.

Why Beijing isn’t reaching for stimulus

Given the export strength, one might expect policymakers to feel less urgency about consumption-side stimulus. That’s roughly what’s happening — and it’s a deliberate choice, not an oversight. Xi Jinping’s government remains committed to dominating high-value manufacturing, which means comprehensive fiscal stimulus aimed at consumers remains unlikely even as domestic demand stays soft, according to the Commission’s bulletin.

See also  France opposes ‘anglicisation’ of EU trade talks

The People’s Bank of China is expected to hold its policy rate steady through the rest of the year, preferring targeted structural tools over a broad-based rate cut, per Vanguard’s forecast. That’s a notably cautious stance given how weak the property sector remains — property investment indicators are down 50% to 80% from their 2020–21 peaks, and a “meaningful domestic-demand turnaround remains elusive,” in Vanguard’s own words.

The regulatory push to keep capital at home

Two moves by Chinese regulators in mid-2026 point to where Beijing’s real priority sits: keeping household savings and private capital funneled toward domestic industrial policy rather than flowing overseas. New rules taking effect July 1 restrict outbound investment that could be used to export restricted technology or expertise under the guise of ordinary capital flows, with violations carrying fines, visa restrictions and industry blacklisting, according to the Commission’s bulletin. The regulations follow Beijing’s move to block the founders of AI firm Manus from completing a sale to Meta, even after the company had relocated its headquarters from China to Singapore — a signal that Beijing is willing to reach across borders to keep promising tech assets tethered to domestic or Hong Kong listings.

The currency and trade angle

Goldman’s team makes an out-of-consensus call worth flagging: it expects China’s current account surplus to rise to 4.2% of GDP in 2026, up from 3.6% in 2025, while the broader analyst consensus surveyed by Bloomberg expects a decline to 2.5%. The divergence comes down to export resilience — falling export prices are making Chinese goods more competitive even as the yuan is expected to appreciate slightly, with export-price inflation in dollar terms forecast to turn positive, rising to 0.7% from -2.7% the prior year.

See also  Gulf States Turn to Private Deals in $10bn Wartime Borrowing Spree: Abu Dhabi, Qatar and Kuwait Sidestep Public Markets

The bottom line

China’s economy in 2026 is a study in contrasts: robust headline export growth sitting on top of underutilized factories, a weak labor market, and a property sector still in its fifth year of decline. The World Bank’s own baseline, published in its country program materials, projects growth moderating toward 4.0% by 2026 — a more conservative read than Goldman’s. Either way, the consensus across forecasters is the same: exports are carrying more of China’s growth than is healthy for the long run, and Beijing’s policy choices this year suggest it’s betting on technological dominance to eventually solve the demand problem, rather than opening the stimulus taps to solve it directly.


Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Analysis

Pakistan Circular Debt Crisis 2026: IMF Deadline Missed, Rs 3.44 Trillion

Published

on

There’s a number that keeps showing up in every conversation about Pakistan’s economy, and it keeps getting bigger: circular debt. As of early July 2026, the gas sector’s share of that debt alone has topped Rs 3.44 trillion, and Islamabad has missed a deadline the IMF set for tariff reforms meant to arrest the slide, according to Dawn.

What circular debt actually is, and why it won’t go away

Circular debt is the chain of unpaid obligations that builds up when the price consumers pay for electricity or gas doesn’t cover what it actually costs to produce and deliver it. Someone in the chain — a power producer, a gas utility, a state-owned enterprise — ends up carrying an IOU, and that IOU gets passed down the line. Earlier this year, IMF officials pressed Pakistan on exactly this dynamic, questioning the government’s plan to zero out gas-sector circular debt, according to Aaj English. At the time, officials said around Rs 150 billion remained payable to companies including Oil and Gas Development Company Limited and Pakistan Petroleum Limited.

Islamabad’s proposed fix included a Rs 5-per-unit levy on gas, dividends from state-owned companies redirected toward debt reduction, and the sale of 35 LNG cargoes annually on the international market. The IMF, per that same reporting, raised pointed questions about whether the plan was actually viable.

The commitments Pakistan has already made

Under its Extended Fund Facility, Pakistan has committed to capping circular debt growth at Rs 300 billion for FY2027 and cutting power-sector subsidies from 0.7% of GDP to 0.6%, according to details reported by ProPakistani. The government has also shifted Nepra’s annual tariff-rebasing cycle from July to January, and Ogra now revises gas tariffs twice a year instead of once.

See also  Pakistan's Growth Outlook Dims: Why the IMF's Latest Cut to 3.2% Matters for 2026 and Beyond

Structurally, some of this is working. The IMF’s own review in May 2026 credited Pakistan with a primary fiscal surplus of 1.6% of GDP for FY26, broadly in line with program targets, and noted gross reserves had climbed to $16 billion by end-December, up from $14.5 billion six months earlier, according to the IMF’s own press release. That progress unlocked roughly $1.1 billion under the EFF and $220 million under a parallel climate-resilience facility, bringing total disbursements under the two arrangements to about $4.8 billion.

Where the fault lines actually are

The uncomfortable part of this story, laid out by commentary reported in The Hans India, is that revenue targets get IMF scrutiny with great precision, while structural reform of loss-making public enterprises — Pakistan International Airlines and Pakistan Steel Mills chief among them — moves far more slowly. Those enterprises’ losses are absorbed by the national exchequer through subsidies, guarantees, and debt restructuring year after year, and privatization plans keep slipping because the political cost of confronting them is high.

Distribution company inefficiency compounds the problem. In FY25, Discos posted Rs 265 billion in losses, an improvement on FY24’s Rs 276 billion but still a substantial drag, according to Geo News, with Quetta, Peshawar and Hyderabad among the worst-performing utilities.

What happens if the pattern holds

Pakistan’s debt-to-GDP ratio sits between 70% and 80% as of 2026, according to Wikipedia’s economic summary, with debt servicing occasionally consuming two-thirds of government spending. That’s the backdrop against which every circular-debt conversation happens: there is very little fiscal room left to absorb another missed deadline.

See also  France opposes ‘anglicisation’ of EU trade talks

The missed gas tariff deadline doesn’t automatically trigger a program breakdown — Pakistan has weathered similar friction points before during its current EFF arrangement. But with the IMF’s own documentation showing persistent concern about the credibility of debt-reduction plans, and with global energy prices still elevated in the aftermath of the Iran war, the margin for further slippage is thin. The next review will likely hinge less on the rhetoric around reform and more on whether the Rs 5 levy and LNG cargo sales actually show up in the numbers.


Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Analysis

Malaysia Bets Its 2026 on “Execution” — And the Semiconductor Upcycle Is Doing the Heavy Lifting

Published

on

Malaysia’s government has declared 2026 a year of “execution” and “discipline” as the Anwar Ibrahim administration races to deliver on the 13th Malaysia Plan (RMK13) ahead of elections that could come as early as February 2028, according to Fortune’s interview with economy minister Akmal Nasrullah Mohd Nasir.

A Strong Base to Build From

Malaysia’s economy grew 4.9% in 2025 following 5.1% growth the year before, with unemployment falling to 2.9% — the lowest in a decade — and the ringgit trading at its strongest level in five years. HSBC’s ASEAN economist Yun Liu forecasts 4.6% growth for 2026, citing strength in electrical equipment manufacturing, tourism, and sound government policy, while Nomura economists have projected an even more bullish 5.2%, pointing to infrastructure spending under RMK13.

The ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) projects growth moderating slightly to 4.6% from an estimated 4.9% in 2025, describing Malaysia’s performance as reflecting its “entrenched position in global semiconductor and electronics value chains” and the broader global tech upcycle, according to AMRO’s assessment of Malaysia’s investment upcycle.

Navigating Washington Without Picking Sides

Malaysia’s trade relationship with the US has been turbulent. Washington imposed 25% tariffs on Malaysian goods in April 2025, rattling the country’s export-led economy, before a deal reduced US duties to 19% in exchange for Malaysia lowering tariffs on select American products, with exemptions carved out for aviation components and electrical equipment. Malaysia’s trade hit a record high of more than 3 trillion ringgit (roughly $780 billion) last year despite the friction.

Deputy finance minister Liew Chin Tong has framed Malaysia’s positioning explicitly around neutrality: the country is “not China, not the US,” a stance he argues gives Malaysia a strategic advantage in both geopolitical and supply-chain terms, according to Fortune’s reporting from the Forum Ekonomi Malaysia summit.

See also  Gulf States Turn to Private Deals in $10bn Wartime Borrowing Spree: Abu Dhabi, Qatar and Kuwait Sidestep Public Markets

Capital Is Flowing In — From Everywhere

Malaysia recorded 22.8 billion ringgit (about $5.8 billion) in foreign direct investment in the first quarter of 2026, a 6.0% year-on-year increase, moderating from the prior quarter’s 48.7% surge. Inflows into information and communication technology services remained particularly strong, with China, Hong Kong, and Singapore serving as the primary capital sources, according to McKinsey’s Southeast Asia quarterly economic review. Bank Negara Malaysia has held its policy rate steady following a pre-emptive 25 basis-point cut in July 2025, with headline inflation projected to average just 2.0% in 2026.

The Long Game: Semiconductors, Rare Earths, and Nuclear Power

Beyond RMK13’s near-term targets, Malaysian officials are positioning the country’s industrial strategy around decades, not years. Minister Akmal has reiterated commitments to eliminate coal use by 2044 and reach net zero by 2050, while confirming Malaysia is actively “exploring the potential” of nuclear power to meet the energy demands of its expanding data-center and semiconductor sectors. AMRO’s structural policy guidance urges Malaysia to develop domestic semiconductor and rare-earth capabilities as a hedge against ongoing US-China “geoeconomic fracturing,” positioning the country as a trusted neutral hub for global manufacturers diversifying away from concentrated exposure to either superpower.


Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2026 The Economy, Inc . All rights reserved .

Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading