Explore President Trump’s upcoming 2026 SOTU address amid record-low approval and political turmoil—insights on the US economy, immigration, and foreign policy shifts.

A year after reclaiming the White House in a historic political comeback, President Donald Trump will step up to the House rostrum on Tuesday at 9 p.m. ET to deliver his State of the Union address. The political climate he faces, however, is one of unusual fragility. Midway between his inauguration and the critical November midterm elections, this 2026 SOTU preview reveals a commander-in-chief confronting a partial government shutdown, rare judicial rebukes, and deep fractures within his own coalition.

When Trump last addressed Congress in March 2025, his approval rating hovered near a career high, buoyed by the momentum of his return to power. Today, he faces an electorate thoroughly fatigued by persistent inflation and systemic gridlock. Tuesday’s address is intended to showcase a leader who has unapologetically reshaped the federal government. Yet, as the Trump State of the Union amid low polls approaches, the spectacle will inevitably be weighed against the stark economic and political realities defining his second act.

Sagging Polls and Economic Realities

Historically, Trump has leveraged economic metrics as his strongest political shield. But the US economy under Trump 2026 presents a complicated picture for international economist researchers and everyday voters alike. According to recent data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, while the stock market has seen notable rallies, 2025 marked the slowest year for job and economic growth since the pandemic-induced recession of 2020.

A recent Gallup tracking poll places his overall approval rating near record lows. Furthermore, roughly two-thirds of Americans currently describe the nation’s economy as “poor”—a sentiment that mirrors the frustrations felt during the latter half of the Biden administration. Grocery, housing, and utility costs remain stubbornly high. Analysts at The Economist note that the US labor market has settled into a stagnant “low-hire, low-fire” equilibrium, heavily exacerbated by sweeping trade restrictions.

Trump has vehemently defended his record, insisting last week that he has “won” on affordability. In his address, he is widely expected to blame his predecessor, Joe Biden, for lingering systemic economic pain while claiming unilateral credit for recent Wall Street highs.

Immigration Backlash and Shutdown Stalemate

Adding to the drama of the evening, Tuesday will mark the first time in modern US history that a president delivers the annual joint address amid a funding lapse. The partial government shutdown, now in its second week, centers entirely on the Department of Homeland Security.

Funding for DHS remains frozen as Democratic lawmakers demand stringent guardrails on the administration’s sweeping immigration crackdown. The standoff reached a boiling point following the deaths of two American citizens by federal agents during border protests in January. This tragic incident sparked nationwide outrage and eroded what was once a core political advantage for the President. An AP-NORC poll recently revealed that approval of Trump’s handling of immigration has plummeted to just 38%. The political capital he once commanded on border security is now deeply contested territory.

The Supreme Court Rebuke and Congressional Dynamics

Trump will be speaking to a Republican-led Congress that he has frequently bypassed. While he secured the passage of his signature tax legislation last summer—dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill,” which combined corporate tax cuts and immigration enforcement funding with deep reductions to Medicaid—he has largely governed via executive order.

This aggressive use of executive authority recently hit a massive judicial roadblock. Last week, the Supreme Court struck down many of Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, a central pillar of his economic agenda. In a pointed majority opinion, Trump-nominated Justice Neil Gorsuch warned against the “permanent accretion of power in the hands of one man.”

This ruling has massive implications for global trade. Financial analysts at The Financial Times suggest that the removal of these tariffs could ease some inflationary pressures, though Trump has already vowed to pursue alternative legal mechanisms to keep import taxes active, promising prolonged uncertainty for international markets.

Simultaneously, Trump’s coalition is showing signs of fraying:

• Demographic Shifts: Americans under 45 have sharply turned against the administration.
• Latino Voters: A demographic that shifted rightward in 2024 has seen steep drops in approval following January’s border violence.
• Intra-Party Apathy: Nearly three in 10 Republicans report that the administration is failing to focus on the country’s most pressing structural problems.

Trump Foreign Policy Shifts and Global Tensions

Foreign policy is expected to feature heavily in the address, highlighting one of the most unpredictable evolutions of his second term. Candidate Trump campaigned heavily on an “America First” platform, promising to extract the US from costly foreign entanglements. However, Trump foreign policy shifts over the last twelve months have alarmed both critics and isolationist allies.

The administration has dramatically expanded US military involvement abroad. Operations have ranged from seizing Venezuela’s president and bolstering forces around Iran to authorizing a lethal campaign of strikes on alleged drug-smuggling vessels—operations that have resulted in scores of casualties. For global observers and defense analysts at The Washington Post, this muscular, interventionist approach contradicts his earlier populist rhetoric, creating unease among voters who favored a pullback from global policing.

What to Expect: A Trump Midterm Rally Speech

Despite the mounting pressures, Trump is unlikely to strike a chastened or conciliatory tone. Observers should expect a classic Trump midterm rally speech.

“It’s going to be a long speech because we have a lot to talk about,” Trump teased on Monday.

Key themes to watch for include:

1. Defending the First Year: Aggressive framing of the “Big, Beautiful Bill” and an insistence that manufacturing is successfully reshoring.
2. Attacking the Courts and Democrats: Expect pointed rhetoric regarding the Supreme Court’s tariff ruling and the ongoing DHS shutdown.
3. Political Theater: Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries has urged his caucus to maintain a “strong, determined and dignified presence,” but several progressive members have already announced plans to boycott the speech in silent protest. For details on streaming the event, see our guide on How to Watch Trump’s State of the Union.

Conclusion: A Test of Presidential Leverage

For a president who has built a global brand on dominance and disruption, Tuesday’s State of the Union represents a profoundly different kind of test. The visual of Trump speaking from the dais while parts of his own government remain shuttered and his signature tariffs sit dismantled by his own judicial appointees is a potent symbol of his current vulnerability.

The core question for international markets and domestic voters alike is no longer whether Trump can shock the system, but whether he can stabilize it. To regain his footing ahead of the November midterms, he must persuade a highly skeptical public that his combative priorities align with their economic needs—and prove that his second act in the White House is anchored by strategy rather than adrift in grievance.

A comprehensive analysis of governance, fiscal policy, and urban transformation in South Asia’s most complex megacity

Based on World Bank Diagnostic Report  |  Policy Roadmap 2025–2035  |  $10 Billion Transformation Framework

PART 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & DIAGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK

Karachi is a city in contradiction. The financial capital of the world’s fifth-most populous nation, it contributes between 12 and 15 percent of Pakistan’s entire GDP while remaining home to some of the most acute urban deprivation in South Asia. A landmark World Bank diagnostic, the foundation of this expanded analysis, structures its findings around three interconnected “Pathways” of reform and four operational “Pillars” for transformation. Together, they constitute a $10 billion roadmap to rescue a city that is quietly—but measurably—losing its economic crown.

The Three Pathways: A Diagnostic Overview

Pathway 1 — City Growth & Prosperity

The central paradox driving the entire World Bank report is one that satellite imagery has made impossible to ignore. While Karachi officially generates between 12 and 15 percent of Pakistan’s national GDP—an extraordinary concentration of economic output in a single metropolitan area—the character and location of that wealth is shifting in troubling ways. Nighttime luminosity data, a reliable proxy for economic intensity, shows a measurable dimming of the city’s historic core. High-value enterprises, anchor firms, and knowledge-economy businesses are quietly relocating to the unmanaged periphery, where land is cheaper, regulatory friction is lower, and the absence of coordinated planning perversely functions as a freedom.

This is not simply a real estate story. It is a harbinger of long-term structural decline. When economic activity migrates from dense, serviced urban centers to sprawling, infrastructure-poor peripheries, the fiscal returns per unit of land diminish, commute times lengthen, productivity suffers, and the social fabric of mixed-use neighborhoods frays. Karachi is not alone in this dynamic—it mirrors patterns seen in Lagos, Dhaka, and pre-reform Johannesburg—but the speed and scale of its centrifugal drift are alarming.

Yet the picture is not uniformly bleak. One of the report’s most striking findings is the city’s quiet success in poverty reduction. Between 2005 and 2015, the share of Karachi’s population living in poverty fell from 23 percent to just 9 percent, making it one of the least poor districts anywhere in Pakistan. This achievement, largely the product of informal economic dynamism, remittance flows, and the resilience of its entrepreneurial working class, stands as proof that Karachi’s underlying human capital remains formidable. The governance challenge is not to create prosperity from nothing—it is to stop squandering the prosperity that already exists.

“Karachi’s economy is like a powerful engine running on a broken chassis. The horsepower is there. The infrastructure to harness it is not.”

Pathway 2 — City Livability

By global benchmarks, Karachi is a city in crisis. It consistently ranks in the bottom decile of international livability indices, a fact that reflects not mere inconvenience but a fundamental failure of urban governance to provide the basic services that allow residents to live healthy, productive, and dignified lives.

Water and sanitation constitute the most acute dimension of this failure. The city’s non-revenue water losses—water that enters the distribution system but never reaches a paying consumer due to leakage, illegal connections, and metering failures—are among the highest recorded for any city of comparable size globally. In a megacity of 16 to 20 million people, depending on the methodology used to define its boundaries, these losses translate into hundreds of millions of liters of treated water wasted daily while residents in katchi abadis pay informal vendors a price per liter that is many multiples of what wealthier households in serviced areas pay through formal utilities. This regressive dynamic—where the urban poor subsidize systemic dysfunction—is one of the defining injustices of Karachi’s service delivery crisis.

Green space presents a related but distinct vulnerability. At just 4 percent of total urban area, Karachi’s parks, tree canopy, and public open spaces are a fraction of the 15 to 20 percent benchmarks recommended by urban health organizations. In a coastal city where summer temperatures routinely exceed 40 degrees Celsius and where the Arabian Sea’s humidity compounds heat stress, this deficit is not merely aesthetic. It is a public health emergency waiting to erupt. The urban heat island effect—whereby dense built environments trap and re-radiate solar energy, raising local temperatures by several degrees above surrounding rural areas—disproportionately affects the informal settlements that house half the city’s population and where air conditioning is a luxury few can afford.

Underlying both crises is the governance fragmentation that the report identifies as the structural root cause of virtually every livability failure. Karachi is currently administered by a patchwork of more than 20 federal, provincial, and local agencies. These bodies collectively control approximately 90 percent of the city’s land. They include the Defence Housing Authority, the Karachi Port Trust, the Karachi Development Authority, the Malir Development Authority, and a constellation of cantonment boards, each operating according to its own mandate, budget cycle, and institutional incentive structure. The result is what urban economists call a “tragedy of the commons” applied to governance: because no single entity bears comprehensive responsibility for the city’s functioning, no single entity has the authority—or the accountability—to coordinate a systemic response to its failures.

“In Karachi, everyone owns the problem and no one owns the solution. That is not governance; it is organized irresponsibility.”

Pathway 3 — City Sustainability & Inclusiveness

The fiscal dimension of Karachi’s crisis is perhaps the most analytically tractable, because it is the most directly measurable. Property taxation—the foundational revenue instrument of urban government worldwide, and the mechanism by which cities convert the value of land and improvements into public services—is dramatically underperforming in Sindh relative to every comparable benchmark.

The International Monetary Fund’s cross-country data confirms that property tax yields in Sindh are significantly below those achieved in Punjab, Pakistan’s other major province, and far below those recorded in comparable Indian metropolitan areas such as Mumbai, Pune, or Hyderabad. The gap is not marginal. Whereas a well-functioning urban property tax system should generate revenues equivalent to 0.5 to 1.0 percent of local GDP, Karachi’s yields fall well short of this range. The consequences are compounding: underfunded maintenance leads to asset deterioration, which reduces the assessed value of the property base, which further constrains tax revenues, which deepens the maintenance deficit. This is a fiscal death spiral, and Karachi is caught within it.

Social exclusion compounds the fiscal crisis in ways that resist easy quantification. Approximately 50 percent of Karachi’s population—somewhere between 8 and 10 million people—lives in katchi abadis, the informal settlements that have grown organically on land not formally designated for residential use, often lacking title, rarely connected to formal utility networks, and perpetually vulnerable to eviction or demolition. The rapid growth of these settlements, driven by both natural population increase and sustained rural-to-urban migration, has increased what sociologists describe as social polarization: the geographic and economic distance between the formal, serviced city and the informal, unserviced one.

This polarization is not merely a social concern. It has direct economic consequences. Informal settlement residents who lack property rights cannot use their homes as collateral for business loans. Children who spend excessive time collecting water or navigating unsafe streets have less time for education. Workers who cannot afford reliable transport face constrained labor market options. The informal city subsidizes the formal one through its labor, while receiving little of the infrastructure investment that makes formal urban life possible.

The Four Transformation Pillars

The World Bank’s $10 billion roadmap does not limit itself to diagnosis. It proposes four operational pillars through which the three pathways of reform can be pursued simultaneously. These pillars are not sequential—they are interdependent, and progress on one without the others is unlikely to prove durable.

Pillar 1 — Accountable Institutions

The first and arguably most foundational pillar concerns governance architecture. The report argues, persuasively, that no amount of infrastructure investment will generate sustainable improvement so long as 20-plus agencies continue to operate in silos across a fragmented land ownership landscape. The solution it proposes is a transition from the current provincial-led, agency-fragmented model to an empowered, elected local government with genuine fiscal authority over the metropolitan area.

This is not a technical recommendation. It is a political one. The devolution of meaningful power to an elected metropolitan authority would require the Sindh provincial government—which has historically resisted any erosion of its control over Karachi’s lucrative land assets—to accept a substantial redistribution of authority. It would require federal agencies to cede operational jurisdiction over land parcels they have controlled for decades. And it would require the creation of new coordination mechanisms: inter-agency land-use committees, joint infrastructure planning bodies, and unified development authorities with the mandate and resources to enforce coherent spatial plans.

International precedents for such transitions are encouraging. Greater Manchester’s devolution deal in the United Kingdom, Metropolitan Seoul’s governance reforms in the 1990s, and the creation of the Greater London Authority all demonstrate that consolidating fragmented metropolitan governance into accountable elected structures can unlock significant improvements in both service delivery and economic performance.

Pillar 2 — Greening for Resilience

The climate dimension of Karachi’s transformation cannot be treated as a luxury add-on to more “practical” infrastructure priorities. A city with 4 percent green space in a warming coastal environment is a city accumulating climate risk at an accelerating rate. The 2015 Karachi heat wave, which killed more than 1,200 people in a single week, was a preview of what routine summers will look like within a decade if the urban heat island effect is not actively countered.

The greening pillar encompasses multiple overlapping interventions: expanding parks and urban forests to absorb heat and manage stormwater; restoring the mangrove ecosystems along Karachi’s coastline that serve as natural buffers against storm surges and coastal erosion; redesigning road networks to incorporate permeable surfaces, street trees, and bioswales; and integrating green infrastructure standards into building codes for new development.

These investments are not merely environmental. They are economic. The World Health Organization estimates that urban green space reduces healthcare costs, increases property values in surrounding areas, and improves labor productivity by reducing heat stress. In a city where informal settlement residents have no access to air conditioning, every degree reduction in ambient temperature achievable through urban greening has a direct, measurable impact on human welfare.

Pillar 3 — Leveraging Assets

Karachi possesses one asset in extraordinary abundance: prime urban land controlled by public agencies. The Defence Housing Authority alone controls thousands of hectares in locations that, by any market measure, represent some of the most valuable real estate on the subcontinent. The Karachi Port Trust, the railways, and various federal ministries hold additional parcels of commercially significant land that are either underdeveloped, misused, or lying fallow.

The asset monetization pillar proposes to unlock this latent value through structured Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) that use land as the primary input for financing major infrastructure projects. The model is well-established: a government agency contributes land at concessional rates to a joint venture, a private developer finances and constructs mixed-use development on a portion of the parcel, and the revenue generated—whether through commercial rents, residential sales, or transit-adjacent development premiums—is used to cross-subsidize the public infrastructure component of the project.

This model has been successfully deployed for mass transit financing in Hong Kong (through the MTR Corporation’s property development strategy), in Singapore (through integrated transit-oriented development), and more recently in Indian cities like Ahmedabad (through the BRTS land value capture mechanism). Karachi’s $10 billion infrastructure gap—encompassing mass transit, water treatment, wastewater management, and flood resilience—is too large for public budgets alone. Asset monetization is not optional; it is the essential bridge between fiscal reality and infrastructure ambition.

Pillar 4 — Smart Karachi

The fourth pillar recognizes that technological capacity is both a multiplier of the other three pillars and a reform agenda in its own right. A city that cannot accurately map its land parcels, track its utility consumption, monitor its traffic flows, or measure its air quality in real time is a city flying blind. Karachi’s current data infrastructure is fragmented, inconsistently maintained, and largely inaccessible to the policymakers who most need it.

The Smart Karachi pillar envisions a comprehensive digital layer over the city’s physical fabric: GIS-based land registries that reduce the scope for fraudulent title claims and agency disputes; smart metering for water and electricity that reduces non-revenue losses; integrated traffic management systems that improve the efficiency of Karachi’s chronically congested road network; and citizen-facing digital platforms that allow residents to pay utility bills, register property transactions, and report service failures without navigating physical bureaucracies that historically reward connection over competence.

Beyond service delivery, digital infrastructure enables a new quality of fiscal accountability. When every property transaction is recorded on a unified digital platform, the scope for tax evasion narrows. When utility consumption is metered and billed accurately, the implicit subsidies that currently flow to well-connected large users are exposed and can be redirected to the residents who actually need them.

PART 2: OPINION ARTICLE

The Megacity Paradox: Can Karachi Reclaim Its Crown?

Originally conceived for The Economist / Financial Times  |  Policy & Economics Desk

I. The Lights Are Going Out

There is a satellite image that haunts Pakistan’s urban planners. Taken at night, it shows the Indian subcontinent as a constellation of light—Mumbai’s sprawl blazing across the Arabian Sea coast, Delhi’s agglomeration pulsing outward in every direction, Lahore’s core radiating upward into Punjab’s flat horizon. And then there is Karachi.

Karachi is visible, certainly. It is not a dark city. But look closely at the World Bank’s time-series nighttime luminosity analysis, and something disturbing emerges: the city center—the historic financial district that once justified Karachi’s sobriquet as the “City of Lights”—is getting dimmer, not brighter. The economic heartbeat of Pakistan’s largest city is weakening at its core while its periphery sprawls outward in an unlit, unplanned, ungovernable direction.

This is not poetry. It is data. And the data tells a story that no government in Islamabad or Karachi seems to want to confront directly: Pakistan’s financial capital is slowly but measurably losing the competition for economic intensity. While Karachi still accounts for an extraordinary 12 to 15 percent of national GDP—more than any other Pakistani city by an enormous margin—the character of that contribution is shifting from high-value, knowledge-intensive activity to lower-productivity, sprawl-dependent commerce. The lights are going out in the places that matter most.

“A city that cannot govern its center cannot grow its future. Karachi is learning this lesson the hard way.”

II. The Governance Trap: Twenty Agencies and No Captain

To understand why Karachi is losing its economic edge, it is necessary to understand something about how the city is actually governed—which is to say, how it is catastrophically not governed.

More than 20 federal, provincial, and local agencies currently exercise jurisdiction over some portion of Karachi’s land, infrastructure, or services. The Defence Housing Authority controls some of the most commercially prime real estate on the subcontinent. The Karachi Development Authority nominally plans land use for the broader metropolitan area. The Malir Development Authority manages a separate zone. Cantonment boards exercise authority over military-adjacent districts. The Sindh government retains overarching provincial jurisdiction. The federal government maintains control of the port, the railways, and various strategic assets.

Together, these agencies control roughly 90 percent of Karachi’s total land area. Separately, none of them has the mandate, the resources, or the incentive to coordinate with the others in service of any coherent vision for the city as a whole. The result is what economists call a “tragedy of the commons” applied to urban governance: because the costs of mismanagement are diffused across all agencies and the benefits of good management accrue to whoever happens to govern the relevant parcel, rational self-interest produces collectively irrational outcomes. Roads built by one agency end abruptly at the boundary of another’s jurisdiction. Water mains installed by one utility are torn up months later by another laying telecom cables. Parks planned for one precinct are quietly rezoned for residential development when a connected developer makes the right request to the right official.

This is not corruption in the traditional sense—though corruption is certainly present. It is something more structurally damaging: the institutionalization of irresponsibility. When no single entity is accountable for the city’s performance, no single entity can be held to account for its failures. Karachi’s governance crisis is not a problem of bad actors. It is a problem of a system designed, whether intentionally or through historical accumulation, to ensure that no one is ever truly responsible.

The analogy that comes to mind is that of a vast corporation with twenty co-equal CEOs, each controlling a different business unit, each reporting to a different shareholder group, and none with the authority to overrule the others on decisions that affect the whole enterprise. No serious investor would put money into such a structure. Yet international capital is expected to flow into Karachi’s infrastructure on exactly these terms.

III. The Fiscal Frontier: The Absurdity of Karachi’s Property Tax

Here is a number that should concentrate minds in every finance ministry from Islamabad to Washington: the property tax yield of Sindh province—which means, in practical terms, largely Karachi—is dramatically lower than that of Punjab, Pakistan’s other major province, and an order of magnitude below what comparable cities in India manage to extract from their property bases.

Property taxation is, as the IMF has repeatedly documented, the bedrock of sustainable urban finance. Unlike income taxes, which are mobile and can be avoided by relocating economic activity, property taxes fall on an asset that cannot move. Land is fixed. Buildings are fixed. The value embedded in a well-located urban parcel—value created not by the owner but by the surrounding city’s infrastructure, connectivity, and economic density—is a legitimate and efficient target for public revenue extraction.

Karachi’s failure to capture this value is not a technical problem. The Sindh government knows where the land is. It knows who owns it, at least formally. The failure is political. Property in Karachi is owned, directly or indirectly, by constituencies that have historically exercised substantial influence over provincial revenue decisions: military-affiliated institutions, politically connected developers, landed families whose wealth is measured in urban plots rather than agricultural hectares, and the 20-plus agencies whose own landholdings are routinely exempt from assessment.

The practical consequence is a city that starves its own maintenance budget. Without adequate property tax revenues, Karachi cannot fund the routine upkeep of its roads, drains, parks, and utility networks. Deferred maintenance becomes structural deterioration. Structural deterioration reduces assessed property values. Reduced assessed values further constrain tax revenues. The spiral tightens. And as the infrastructure degrades, the high-value businesses and residents who might otherwise anchor the formal tax base migrate—precisely to the peri-urban fringe where assessments are even lower and enforcement is even weaker.

The comparison with Mumbai is instructive and humbling. Mumbai’s Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, despite its own well-documented dysfunctions, generates property tax revenues sufficient to fund a meaningful share of the city’s operating budget. Karachi’s fiscal capacity is a fraction of Mumbai’s, despite a comparable or larger population. This gap is not destiny. It is policy failure, and policy failure can be reversed.

IV. The Human Cost: Green Space, Public Transport, and Social Exclusion

Behind every percentage point of GDP and every unit of property tax yield, there are people. And in Karachi, roughly half of those people—somewhere between 8 and 10 million human beings—live in katchi abadis: informal settlements without formal property rights, reliable utilities, or legal protection against eviction.

The absence of green space, which stands at a mere 4 percent of Karachi’s urban area against a globally recommended minimum of 15 percent, may seem like a quality-of-life concern rather than a governance emergency. But in a coastal megacity where summer temperatures regularly exceed 40 degrees Celsius, green space is not a luxury. It is a survival infrastructure. The 2015 heat wave that killed more than 1,200 Karachi residents in a single week—the vast majority of them poor, elderly, or engaged in outdoor labor—was a preview of what happens when a city builds itself as a concrete heat trap and then removes the last natural mechanisms for thermal relief.

Public transport amplifies the exclusion dynamic. Karachi has one of the lowest rates of formal public transit use of any megacity its size. The city’s primary mass transit project—the Green Line Bus Rapid Transit corridor—has been in various stages of construction and delay for the better part of a decade. In its absence, millions of residents depend on informal minibuses and rickshaws that are slow, unreliable, expensive relative to informal-sector wages, and environmentally catastrophic. Workers in Karachi’s industrial zones who might otherwise access higher-paying employment in the financial district are effectively priced out of mobility. The labor market is segmented not by skill alone but by geography, and geography in Karachi is determined by whether one happens to live near the remnants of a functional transit connection.

Social polarization—the growing distance, geographic and economic, between those who live in the serviced formal city and those consigned to the informal one—is not merely an equity concern. It is a threat to the social contract that makes metropolitan agglomeration economically productive in the first place. Cities generate wealth through density, through the interactions and spillovers that occur when diverse people with diverse skills and ideas occupy shared space. When half a city’s population is effectively excluded from the spaces where those interactions happen—because they cannot afford the transport, because they lack the addresses required for formal employment, because the green spaces that make urban life bearable do not exist in their neighborhoods—the economic dividend of agglomeration is substantially squandered.

“Karachi’s inequality is not an unfortunate side effect of its growth. It is an active drag on the growth that could otherwise occur.”

V. Radical Empowerment: The Only Path Forward

The World Bank report is, appropriately, diplomatic in its language. It speaks of “institutional reform,” of “transitioning toward empowered local government,” of “Track 1 vision” and “shared commitment.” These are the necessary euphemisms of multilateral diplomacy. But translated into plain language, the report’s core argument is blunt: Karachi will not be saved by better planning documents or more coordinated inter-agency meetings. It will be saved only by radical political devolution.

What Karachi needs—what its scale, complexity, and fiscal situation demand—is an elected metropolitan mayor with genuine executive authority over the city’s land, budget, and infrastructure. Not a mayor who advises the provincial government. Not a mayor who chairs a committee. A mayor who can be voted out of office if the roads are not repaired, the water does not flow, and the city continues to dim.

This is not an untested idea. Greater London’s transformation under Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson—whatever one thinks of their respective politics—demonstrated that a directly elected executive with transport and planning powers can fundamentally alter the trajectory of a major global city within a single term. Metro Manila’s governance reforms in the 1990s, imperfect as they were, showed that consolidating fragmented metropolitan authority into a more unified structure produces measurable improvements in infrastructure coordination. Even Pakistan’s own history provides precedent: Karachi’s period of most effective urban management arguably occurred under the elected metropolitan mayor system that prevailed briefly in the early 2000s, before provincial interests reasserted control.

The Sindh government’s resistance to devolution is understandable in terms of short-term political calculus. Karachi’s land is extraordinarily valuable, and control of that land is the foundation of enormous political and economic power. But the calculus changes when one considers the medium-term consequences of continued governance failure. If Karachi’s economic decline continues—if the businesses flee, the tax base erodes, the informal settlements expand, and the infrastructure deteriorates beyond cost-effective rehabilitation—the Sindh government will find itself governing a fiscal and social catastrophe rather than a golden goose.

The international community—the OECD, the IMF, the World Bank, bilateral development partners—has a role to play in shifting this calculus. The $10 billion investment framework proposed in the World Bank report should not be made available on the existing governance terms. It should be conditioned, explicitly and transparently, on measurable progress toward metropolitan devolution: the passage of legislation establishing an elected metropolitan authority, the transfer of specific land-use planning powers from provincial agencies to the new metropolitan government, and the implementation of a reformed property tax system with independently verified yield targets.

This is not interference in Pakistan’s internal affairs. It is the basic principle of development finance: that large public investments require the governance conditions necessary to make those investments productive. Pouring $10 billion into a city governed by 20 uncoordinated agencies is not development. It is waste on a grand scale.

Karachi was once the most dynamic city in South Asia. In 1947, it was Pakistan’s largest, wealthiest, and most cosmopolitan urban center. The decades of governance failure that followed its initial promise are not irreversible. The city’s underlying assets—its port, its financial markets, its entrepreneurial population, its coastal location—remain extraordinary. The human capital that built Karachi’s original prosperity has not gone anywhere. It is waiting, in informal settlements and gridlocked streets and underperforming schools, for a governance system capable of releasing it.

The question is not whether Karachi can reclaim its crown. The question is whether Pakistan’s political establishment has the will to create the conditions under which it can. The satellite data showing the city’s dimming lights is not a verdict. It is a warning. And warnings, unlike verdicts, can still be heeded.

Key Statistics at a Glance

Economic Contribution: 12–15% of Pakistan’s GDP generated by a single city

Poverty Reduction: From 23% (2005) to 9% (2015) — one of Pakistan’s least poor districts

Governance Fragmentation: 20+ agencies controlling 90% of city land

Green Space Deficit: 4% vs. 15–20% globally recommended

Informal Settlements: 50% of population in katchi abadis without property rights

Infrastructure Investment Gap: $10 billion required over the next decade

Heat Wave Mortality: 1,200+ deaths in the 2015 event alone

Property Tax Yield: Significantly below Punjab, Pakistan and Indian metro benchmarksThis analysis draws on the World Bank Karachi Urban Diagnostic Report, IMF cross-country fiscal data, and global urban governance research. It is intended for policymakers, development finance institutions, and international investors engaged with Pakistan’s urban futur

Johor’s record RM91.1B investment boom is reshaping Malaysia’s south—but soaring rents, food prices, and traffic are testing residents’ resilience. Here’s the full picture.

Rising rents, “Singapore pricing,” and a cup of kopi that no longer costs what it used to—Johor’s dazzling economic transformation is extracting a toll from the very people it promised to lift.

Fatimah has been running her kopitiam in Johor Bahru’s old town for nineteen years. She remembers when a cup of kopi-o cost 80 sen and regulars would linger for hours, reading newspapers and trading gossip about life across the Causeway. These days, that same cup costs RM2.50—and some of her competitors near the new commercial strips are charging closer to RM4. Her rent has nearly doubled in three years. Her breakfast crowd has thinned, not because people are less hungry, but because many of her regulars have quietly relocated to suburban neighborhoods farther from the city center, chasing the affordable ordinariness that downtown Johor Bahru can no longer reliably provide.

“People keep telling me this is good for Johor,” she says, refilling a customer’s glass. “Maybe. But good for who, exactly?”

It is a question that hangs over Malaysia’s most dazzling economic story of the decade—and one that policymakers, investors, and economists are only beginning to answer with the rigor it deserves.

The Engines of Growth: FDI, Data Centers, and the JS-SEZ

The numbers are, by any measure, extraordinary. As reported by Bernama, Johor recorded RM91.1 billion in approved investments through the first three quarters of 2025 alone—surpassing the combined investment totals of 2023 (RM43 billion) and 2024 (RM48.5 billion) in a single year. The state is on track to breach RM100 billion for the full year, cementing its position as Malaysia’s top investment destination and leaving Selangor (RM51.9 billion) and Kuala Lumpur (RM45 billion) well behind.

The architecture of this boom rests on three pillars. First, the Johor–Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ), formally established on January 8, 2025, spans 3,288 square kilometers across nine flagship areas straddling Iskandar Malaysia and Pengerang—a footprint nearly five times the size of Singapore and almost double that of Shenzhen. As JLL Malaysia’s research highlights, the zone targets eleven priority sectors, from advanced manufacturing and logistics to the digital economy and healthcare. The bilateral framework offers tax incentives, streamlined regulatory clearance, and a special visa pathway for skilled workers and investors.

Second, the data center boom has turned Johor into one of Southeast Asia’s most coveted digital real estate markets. Google, Microsoft, and Nvidia have collectively committed over $20 billion in regional tech infrastructure, with significant portions anchored in Johor. ByteDance’s AI-focused data center at Sedenak Tech Park in Kulai has already gone live. According to FactSet Insights, combined planned data center power capacity across Johor, Kuala Lumpur, and Singapore is projected to reach 21 GW—a figure that underscores the region’s ambitions as Asia’s next hyperscale corridor.

Third, the Rapid Transit System (RTS) Link—a 4-kilometer rail crossing between Johor Bahru and Singapore due to open in late 2026—will carry 10,000 passengers per hour, cutting cross-border travel time to a mere six minutes. That single infrastructure project, perhaps more than any other, is reshaping Johor’s economic identity from a peripheral manufacturing zone into an integrated urban economy tethered to one of the world’s most productive city-states.

The macroeconomic ambition is equally bold. Johor’s state government has publicly targeted a doubling of GDP to RM260 billion by 2030. Nomura’s projection of 5.2% GDP growth for Malaysia in 2026, alongside AMRO Asia’s bullish regional outlook, provides favorable tailwinds. Fortune has noted that Malaysia broadly sees 2026 as a year of “execution”—and nowhere is that pressure more acutely felt than in Johor, where the scaffolding of ambition has been erected with remarkable speed.

“This is not about competing with Penang or Selangor,” Natazha Harris, chief executive of Invest Johor, told The Business Times. “It’s about complementing existing hubs—especially where companies need space to scale.”

The Human Cost: Rising Rents, “Singapore Pricing,” and a Cup That Costs More

But the view from Fatimah’s kopitiam tells a different story—one that investment promotion brochures rarely include.

As Malay Mail reported in February 2026, Johor Bahru residents say they are being “priced out” of their own city, particularly in downtown areas where the spending power of cross-border shoppers from Singapore has driven up the cost of everyday goods. The phenomenon has acquired its own vernacular: “Singapore pricing.” During the Chinese New Year 2026 season, local foot traffic in traditional commercial districts visibly declined, with residents pivoting toward suburban hypermarkets and e-commerce platforms to manage household budgets.

The macroeconomic data validates the anecdote. Johor recorded the highest inflation rate among all Malaysian states in December 2025—2.3 percent, well above the national average. Sunway University economics professor Yeah Kim Leng attributes part of this to anticipatory behavior: businesses are raising wages and prices in expectation of JS-SEZ-related demand, even before much of that demand has fully materialized. This forward-looking inflation is particularly insidious because it front-loads the costs of development onto existing residents while the benefits—higher wages, better jobs, improved public services—remain largely in the pipeline.

The property market tells a similarly uncomfortable story. JLL Malaysia’s mid-2025 research found that average transaction prices for serviced apartments in Johor Bahru surged 20.4 percent in Q2 2025 compared to the 2024 average. Double-storey terrace houses rose 8.6 percent over the same period. Some condominiums in RTS-adjacent corridors have appreciated 40 to 50 percent since 2020. Office rents that once hovered around RM4 per square foot are now touching RM5.80 in prime locations.

The rental market has been even less forgiving. With rental yields averaging 6 to 8 percent in city-center locations—attractive benchmarks for investors—landlords have little incentive to hold prices steady. For young professionals earning local wages, the math has become increasingly punishing. A two-bedroom apartment that rented for RM1,200 per month in 2022 may now command RM1,900 or more.

The Price of Progress: Then vs. Now

Sources: JLL Malaysia, Malay Mail, The Straits Times, field reports

Invest Johor’s Natazha Harris has acknowledged the friction with disarming candor: “It’s the price we pay for progress. The first thing you notice is heavier traffic. More people are coming in. And rentals are going up.” He noted that the state government has introduced targeted assistance programs to cushion the impact—though critics argue those cushions are thin relative to the velocity of price increases.

Infrastructure Under Strain: The Invisible Tax on Daily Life

Beyond rent and food prices, Johor residents are paying an invisible tax measured in hours lost to traffic congestion—and the psychological toll of living in a city whose infrastructure was not designed for the pace of growth now being demanded of it.

The main Causeway and the Second Link connecting Johor Bahru to Singapore were already under severe pressure before the JS-SEZ era began. Cross-border vehicle queues that once cleared in forty-five minutes now routinely extend to two hours or more during peak periods. As Reed Smith’s mid-2025 analysis notes, the RTS Link’s anticipated capacity of 10,000 passengers per hour should relieve some of this burden when it opens in late 2026—but the construction period itself has added disruption, and the link’s catchment area is geographically limited.

The state government has proposed an Autonomous Rapid Transit (ART) system with 32 stations across three key corridors—Skudai, Tebrau, and Iskandar Puteri—to be implemented via public-private partnership. An electrified double-track rail extension will eventually cut Kuala Lumpur–Johor Bahru travel time to four hours. These are credible, well-conceived infrastructure responses. But infrastructure, by its nature, lags the demand that necessitates it. For residents navigating morning commutes today, the ART is a 2027 or 2028 reality.

Energy is another pressure point. According to Reed Smith’s analysis, insufficient electricity supply had already forced the deferment of nearly 30 percent of 2024 data center proposals in Johor. Grid upgrades and potential ASEAN-level power exchange agreements are under consideration, but the gap between digital infrastructure demand and utility supply capacity represents a structural bottleneck that could slow the very boom investors are banking on—while raising electricity costs for ordinary consumers in the interim.

Key Challenges Facing Johor Residents in 2026

• Housing affordability crisis: Serviced apartment prices up 20.4% year-on-year; rental yields prioritizing investors over tenants
• “Singapore pricing” inflation: Johor’s 2.3% inflation rate highest in Malaysia; food prices up RM2–5 per item at downtown establishments
• Traffic congestion: Cross-border queue times regularly exceeding 2 hours; city road networks at capacity
• Energy infrastructure lag: 30% of 2024 data center proposals deferred due to power supply constraints
• Workforce displacement risk: Wages rising in anticipation of JS-SEZ, but unevenly—benefiting skilled workers while low-income residents face cost increases without wage gains
• Affordable housing undersupply: New property launches skewed toward premium segments targeting Singapore commuters and investors

The Tourism Dimension: When Affordable Becomes a Memory

Johor Bahru has long been a destination for Singaporean day-trippers drawn by the currency differential and the city’s reputation for affordable food, shopping, and entertainment. That value proposition is eroding. As The Straits Times has reported, Singaporean shoppers are increasingly noting that the gap between JB and Singapore prices—for meals, coffee, even groceries—has narrowed substantially. Some visitors report that the “cheap JB trip” of popular memory is becoming more myth than reality.

For the tourism economy, this is a double-edged development. Higher prices may deter the high-volume, low-margin visitor segment while attracting more premium tourism spending. But the transition is disorderly, and traditional hawker operators, coffeeshop owners, and independent retailers—the cultural fabric of Johor Bahru’s streetscape—are caught in a painful middle ground.

There is a deeper irony here that economists sometimes understate: the qualities that made Johor attractive—its affordability, its accessibility, its lack of Singapore’s expensive formality—are precisely what is being consumed by the boom itself.

Balancing Act: Opportunities Amid the Disruption

It would be analytically incomplete to frame Johor’s transformation purely as a story of burden. The investment surge is creating real opportunities that deserve equal weight.

As MIDA’s data confirms, Malaysia’s approved investments in the first half of 2025 were expected to generate over 89,000 new jobs nationally, with Johor as the leading contributor. The JS-SEZ’s special visa and work permit schemes are designed to funnel high-skilled employment into the corridor. Johor has set a minimum salary of RM4,000 for skilled talent—a benchmark that, if widely implemented, would represent a meaningful wage floor uplift.

The private capital data is encouraging too. FactSet’s analysis shows total deal value in the JS-SEZ corridor rising from $56.3 billion in 2024 to $57.5 billion in 2025, even as overall deal volume fell—a sign of larger, higher-conviction investments rather than speculative churn. For property owners (as opposed to renters), the capital appreciation has been substantial. For skilled professionals in digital, manufacturing, and logistics sectors, Johor’s labor market has rarely been more competitive.

The New Straits Times has highlighted that even the previously stubborn property overhang problem—thousands of unsold units that once blighted Johor’s market—has largely resolved itself, with over 3,000 overhang units absorbed in the past year alone. That is not a trivial indicator of genuine underlying demand.

Natazha Harris frames the state’s position with tempered optimism: “This is about speed, certainty and coordination. That’s what investors care about once they’ve made the decision to commit.” The Johor state government, working in concert with federal agencies like MIDA and IRDA, has built a coordination infrastructure that investors across Asia—including a growing cohort of Chinese manufacturers exploring regional diversification—are finding unusually responsive.

Conclusion: Progress Must Earn Its Name

Johor is at an inflection point that Malaysia has rarely seen outside of Kuala Lumpur’s late-1990s construction frenzy or Penang’s semiconductor ascent. The scale of capital arriving—RM91.1 billion in nine months, tech giants committing decades-long infrastructure—is not noise. It is structural. And the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone, if its ambitions are realized, could genuinely redraw the economic geography of Southeast Asia.

But progress that is not deliberately shared is not progress—it is displacement rebranded.

Fatimah’s kopitiam, and the thousands of small establishments like it that constitute the social infrastructure of Johor Bahru, is not a footnote to this story. It is the story, in the way that the stories of ordinary people always ultimately are. The question Johor’s policymakers must answer—with policy instruments rather than platitudes—is whether the boom’s dividends can be channeled downward with the same efficiency that foreign capital has been channeled inward.

Concretely, this means expanding the affordable housing pipeline beyond premium segments; deploying cost-of-living assistance that is means-tested and substantial rather than symbolic; accelerating the ART and RTS infrastructure timelines to reduce the congestion tax on working residents; and establishing transparent wage benchmarking mechanisms so that labor market benefits of the JS-SEZ are not captured exclusively by the already-skilled.

Nomura’s projection of 5.2% growth for Malaysia in 2026 is achievable. Johor’s ambition to reach RM260 billion in GDP by 2030 may well be, too. But the most important metric—the one that will determine whether this era is remembered as a genuine leap forward or a cautionary tale about unmanaged urbanization—is whether the people of Johor can still afford to live, work, and linger over a cup of kopi in the city they built.

That affordability, once lost, is very hard to recover. And the time to protect it is now, while the investment wave is still rising and policy still has room to shape its course.