Global Economy
The Double-Edged Sword of U.S. Economic Power
The United States has increasingly utilized its economic might as a tool of statecraft in the twenty-first century.
The United States has increasingly utilized its economic might as a tool of statecraft in the twenty-first century. Washington has employed tariffs, sanctions, and military force to influence the actions of its adversaries. Two of the most significant instances of this tactic are the tariffs placed on China during the trade war and the sanctions placed on Russia after it invaded Ukraine.
The goals of both actions were to safeguard American interests and exert influence overseas. However, the ramifications of their actions have been far more intricate than Washington policymakers may have expected. They have expedited the disintegration of the international order, tested relationships, and changed global markets.
In 2022, the United States and its allies imposed an unprecedented set of sanctions in response to Russian tanks rolling into Ukraine. Energy corporations were subject to restrictions, Russian banks were shut out of the global financial system, and the assets of oligarchs were frozen. The objective was clear: to put pressure on President Vladimir Putin to alter the path of the war and to make it harder for Moscow to finance it.
The sanctions have produced a range of economic outcomes. Although Russia’s GDP shrank precipitously in the immediate aftermath, the nation turned out to be more resilient than many had anticipated. Moscow was able to lessen the impact by shifting oil exports to China, India, and other ready consumers.
Despite its volatility, the ruble did not completely collapse. But there is no denying the long-term harm. Russia has been compelled to rely on Beijing, denied access to cutting-edge technology, and shut out of Western financing markets. In order to preserve cash flow, its energy industry, which was formerly the foundation of its worldwide dominance, is now selling at a discount. The largest trading bloc in the world, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), provided China with new ways to counteract American pressure.
However, there have been notable global consequences. Europe’s severe reliance on Russian gas led to an energy crisis and a sharp increase in costs. Developing countries, already struggling with post-pandemic inflation, saw increases in the cost of food and petrol. The world was also affected by sanctions meant to punish Moscow, raising questions about whether the West had underestimated the collateral damage.
Russia’s resolve has been diplomatically reinforced by sanctions. Instead, the Kremlin has stepped up its depiction of Western hostility. For many in the Global South, the sanctions regime has reinforced perceptions of a divided international order, where Western values are selectively implemented.
Tariffs on China were the result of rivalry, whereas sanctions on Russia were the result of conflict. Citing unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, and a widening trade deficit, Washington levied broad duties on Chinese goods starting in 2018. The purpose of the tariffs was to safeguard American industries and restore economic equilibrium. The immediate result was a dramatic rise in hostilities between the United States and China. Beijing responded by imposing tariffs of its own on American manufacturing and agriculture.
Customers suffered at the checkout counter, supply networks were interrupted, and business expenses increased. Although the tariffs hindered China’s economy, they also encouraged adaptation. By making significant investments in domestic technology and extending commercial relations with ASEAN countries, Beijing strengthened its commitment to independence.
China now has additional ways to counteract pressure from the United States thanks to the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the largest trading grouping in the world. The trade imbalance was not significantly reduced by the tariffs for the US.
Rather, they emphasized how closely the two economies are interdependent. Farmers that depended on Chinese markets suffered from retaliatory actions, while American businesses that relied on Chinese production had to pay more.
Above all, the tariffs possibly sped up the decoupling process. As Beijing and Washington started to reconsider their mutual dependence, global supply chains gradually changed. Reshoring and diversification helped some industries, but overall, the impact was increased costs and more unpredictability.
Both measures disrupted global markets, imposed costs on both allies and adversaries, and produced mixed results in terms of changing behavior. China has not fundamentally changed its industrial policies, and Russia has not withdrawn from Ukraine. Instead, both countries have adapted, finding ways to mitigate the pressure while strengthening ties with alternative partners.
At first glance, tariffs on China and sanctions on Russia may seem like different tools aimed at different problems; one targeted geopolitical aggression, the other economic competition. However, both measures reflect a broader U.S. strategy: using economic leverage to achieve political ends without resorting to military force.
But the distinctions are just as significant. Global manufacturing has changed as a result of tariffs on China, while global energy markets have changed as a result of sanctions on Russia. Tariffs are transactional and competitive, whereas sanctions are punitive and isolating. When taken as a whole, they demonstrate the flexibility—and constraints—of economic pressure.
The indirect effects of U.S. sanctions and tariffs on the global system may be more important than their direct effects on China or Russia. Washington has made it clear that political alignment is required to gain access to its markets and financial networks by weaponizing economic interdependence.
This has caused competitors to look for other options. While China is establishing alternative organizations like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and encouraging the use of the yuan in international trade, Russia is becoming more and more dependent on China. To avoid getting caught in the crossfire of great-power conflict, even allies of the United States are hedging.
As a result, the liberal economic system that the US helped establish is gradually being undermined. We might be heading towards a fractured world of rival blocs rather than a single, cohesive global organization. This results in increased expenses and uncertainty for firms. Governments will have to make more difficult decisions between conflicting areas of power.
The lesson is not that tariffs and sanctions don’t work. They have the power to signal resolve, inflict actual costs, and influence rivals’ calculations. However, they are not panaceas. Economic coercion has the risk of turning into a blunt tool that emboldens adversaries and alienates allies in the absence of diplomacy, coalition building, and long-term planning.
Additionally, Washington needs to understand the boundaries of its power. Although the dollar still holds sway, excessive use of financial sanctions may hasten the development of substitutes. Tariffs might shield some industries, but they can’t undo decades of globalization in a single day.
The United States must ultimately find a balance between engagement and pressure. Instead of being the toolkit itself, sanctions and tariffs ought to be a component of a larger one. If not, the United States runs the risk of eroding the same framework of free markets and partnerships that has long served as the basis for its dominance.
Both the potential and the danger of economic statecraft are demonstrated by the tariffs on China and the sanctions on Russia. They show that without firing a shot, the United States can nevertheless influence world events. However, they also demonstrate that, similar to military might, economic might has unforeseen repercussions.
Washington needs to use its economic powers more accurately, modestly, and strategically if it hopes to survive this new era of great-power competition. Otherwise, America itself could be harmed by the two-edged sword of tariffs and sanctions, not only its enemies.
Discover more from The Economy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Events
🌍 Davos 2026: The World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Sets the Stage for Global Transformation
From January 19 to 23, 2026, the alpine town of Davos, Switzerland, will once again become the epicenter of global dialogue as the World Economic Forum (WEF) Annual Meeting—widely known as the Davos Forum—brings together more than 2,500 influential leaders from across the globe. This flagship event is not just a gathering; it’s a strategic crucible where the future of our interconnected world is debated, shaped, and often reimagined.
🔹 Who’s Coming to Davos?
The attendee list reads like a who’s who of global influence:
- Heads of State and Government Ministers
- CEOs of Fortune 500 companies and tech innovators
- Renowned academics and thought leaders
- Media powerhouses and civil society champions
This diverse mix ensures that the conversations are not siloed but instead reflect the multifaceted nature of today’s challenges—from climate resilience and digital transformation to geopolitical tensions and inclusive growth.
🔹 What’s on the Agenda?
The 2026 theme centers on “Public-Private Cooperation for a Resilient Future.” With the world facing compounding crises—economic volatility, climate emergencies, AI disruption, and widening inequality—the Davos Forum aims to forge actionable pathways through collaboration.
Key focus areas include:
- Global Economic Stability: Tackling inflation, debt, and trade imbalances
- AI and Digital Governance: Building ethical frameworks for emerging technologies
- Climate Action and Energy Transition: Accelerating decarbonization and green finance
- Geopolitical Dialogue: Navigating multipolar tensions and regional conflicts
- Social Inclusion: Empowering youth, women, and marginalized communities through policy innovation
🔹 Why Davos Matters More Than Ever
In a world often fragmented by ideology and competition, Davos remains a rare platform where dialogue precedes division. It’s where CEOs and activists sit side by side, where presidents listen to professors, and where ideas transcend borders.
As the 2026 meeting unfolds, expect bold announcements, unexpected alliances, and a renewed commitment to shared prosperity and sustainable progress. Whether you’re a policymaker, entrepreneur, or global citizen, the outcomes of Davos will ripple far beyond the Swiss Alps.
Stay tuned for daily updates, keynote highlights, and behind-the-scenes insights as we cover the pulse of Davos 2026.
Discover more from The Economy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Global Economy
Unlocking the Future of IT Exports: AI Surge as the Blueprint for Economic Growth
Introduction
The global economy is at a crossroads. Traditional growth engines—manufacturing, agriculture, and extractive industries—are struggling to keep pace with the demands of a hyper-connected world. Meanwhile, the digital economy has emerged as the most dynamic frontier, reshaping trade flows, labor markets, and national competitiveness. For developing nations, the stakes are particularly high: either embrace digital transformation or risk being left behind in a rapidly evolving global order.
At the heart of this transformation lies Artificial Intelligence (AI). Once confined to research labs and niche applications, AI has now entered the mainstream. Tools like Google Gemini and AI Studio are no longer curiosities for tech enthusiasts; they are becoming everyday instruments for productivity, creativity, and commerce. This surge in adoption is not merely a technological trend—it is an economic revolution in motion.
The thesis of this article is bold yet urgent: AI adoption is the single most potent, overlooked policy lever for transforming national economies, bridging trade deficits, and creating globally competitive IT export powerhouses. If policymakers act decisively, AI can become the cornerstone of export-led growth, particularly in developing nations where the future of IT exports could redefine economic destiny.
But this transformation will not happen automatically. It requires a policy roadmap for AI adoption in SMEs, infrastructure reform, and a deliberate strategy to bridge the digital divide in developing economies. Without these interventions, the promise of AI risks being squandered, leaving nations trapped in cycles of underdevelopment.
The AI Surge: From Silicon Valley to the National Economy
The Tipping Point of Tools
The story of AI’s rise is not just about algorithms—it is about accessibility. For decades, AI was the preserve of elite institutions and tech giants. Today, however, platforms like Google Gemini and AI Studio have democratized access. A freelance designer in Karachi, a small business in Nairobi, or a startup in Dhaka can now harness AI for tasks ranging from content creation to predictive analytics.
This tipping point of tools matters profoundly for economic policy. Why? Because mass adoption transforms AI from a niche innovation into a general-purpose technology—akin to electricity or the internet. When electricity became widespread, it powered factories, homes, and offices, catalyzing industrial revolutions. Similarly, AI’s mainstreaming is poised to catalyze a digital transformation vs. traditional economic growth debate.
Consider the following examples:
- Google Gemini enables real-time language translation, bridging communication gaps for export-oriented firms.
- AI Studio allows SMEs to automate marketing campaigns, reducing costs and expanding reach.
- Freelancers leveraging AI tools can deliver services at global standards, contributing to the freelance economy’s role in boosting national revenue.
For policymakers, the lesson is clear: AI is not just about innovation—it is about economic productivity. By leveraging Google Gemini for economic productivity, nations can unlock efficiencies that ripple across industries, from IT exports to agriculture supply chains.
The Policy Blueprint for Export Revenue: $10 Billion and Beyond
If AI adoption is the lever, policy is the fulcrum. Without deliberate intervention, the potential of AI will remain underutilized. To translate adoption into export revenue, governments must craft a policy blueprint that aligns incentives, infrastructure, and regulation.
Here are the critical pillars of such a blueprint:
- Tax Incentives for AI-driven firms: Offer tax breaks to SMEs and startups that integrate AI into their operations, encouraging rapid adoption.
- Regulatory Sandboxes: Create controlled environments where firms can experiment with AI applications without fear of punitive regulation.
- Digital Infrastructure Investment: Prioritize broadband expansion, cloud computing facilities, and reliable energy grids to support AI scalability.
- Export Promotion Programs: Establish dedicated funds to help firms market AI-enabled services abroad, positioning them as competitive players in global IT markets.
- Human Capital Development: Launch AI-focused training programs to equip workers with skills that match global demand.
The future of IT exports in developing nations hinges on these interventions. Imagine a scenario where a country like Pakistan or Bangladesh channels AI adoption into IT services exports. With the right blueprint, export revenues could surge past $10 billion annually, bridging trade deficits and strengthening foreign reserves.
This is not speculative optimism—it is grounded in precedent. Nations that invested in digital infrastructure and policy alignment (e.g., Estonia, Singapore) transformed themselves into IT export hubs. Developing nations can replicate this trajectory by treating AI adoption as a national economic strategy, not just a technological experiment.
“
Unlocking the SME Engine: AI’s Humanized Impact on the Ground
While policymakers debate macroeconomic strategies, the real transformation happens at the grassroots. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are the forgotten backbone of most economies, contributing up to 60% of employment and nearly 40% of GDP in many developing nations. Yet SMEs often struggle with limited resources, outdated practices, and restricted access to global markets.
Here is where AI becomes a humanized disruptor. By integrating AI tools, SMEs can achieve operational efficiency at a fraction of the cost. Consider the following impacts:
- Operational Efficiency: AI-powered inventory management reduces waste and optimizes supply chains.
- Marketing Automation: Tools like AI Studio allow SMEs to run targeted campaigns, reaching customers beyond local boundaries.
- Financial Inclusion: AI-driven fintech platforms provide SMEs with access to microcredit and digital payments, bridging liquidity gaps.
- Global Reach: AI-enabled translation and content creation empower SMEs to market products internationally, contributing to IT exports.
This is the policy roadmap for AI adoption in SMEs:
- Provide subsidies for AI tool subscriptions.
- Establish AI training hubs in industrial clusters.
- Facilitate partnerships between SMEs and global tech firms.
- Ensure affordable cloud access for small businesses.
The impact is not abstract—it is deeply human. A textile SME in Lahore using AI to predict fashion trends can compete with global brands. A farmer cooperative in Kenya using AI for crop yield predictions can access export markets. These stories illustrate how AI adoption is not just about numbers—it is about empowering people and communities.
The Digital Chasm: Analyzing Constraints and Mitigating Risks
No transformation is without challenges. The promise of AI is immense, but so are the risks. Developing nations face a digital chasm that must be bridged to sustain growth.
Key constraints include:
- Data Privacy Concerns: Without robust frameworks, AI adoption risks exposing sensitive information.
- Energy Costs: AI infrastructure is energy-intensive, posing challenges for nations with unstable grids.
- Infrastructure Stability: Broadband gaps and unreliable connectivity hinder scalability.
- Skill Gaps: Human capital development lags behind technological progress, creating mismatches in labor markets.
To address these, policymakers must prioritize sustaining IT sector growth through infrastructure reform. Concrete strategies include:
- Data Governance Frameworks: Establish national data protection laws aligned with global standards.
- Green Energy Integration: Invest in renewable energy to power AI infrastructure sustainably.
- Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborate with telecom firms to expand broadband access.
- Skill Development Programs: Launch AI literacy campaigns and vocational training to close the skill gap.
The digital transformation vs. traditional economic growth debate is not about choosing one over the other—it is about integration. Traditional sectors can be revitalized through AI, while digital sectors can drive exports. The challenge is to ensure inclusivity, so that bridging the digital divide in developing economies becomes a reality, not a slogan.
Conclusion
The surge of AI adoption is not a passing trend—it is the defining economic lever of our time. Tools like Google Gemini and AI Studio symbolize a broader shift: from niche innovation to mainstream productivity. For developing nations, this shift offers a once-in-a-generation opportunity to bridge trade deficits, boost IT exports, and create globally competitive economies.
But opportunity without action is wasted potential. Policymakers must craft a policy blueprint, empower SMEs, and reform infrastructure to sustain growth. The freelance economy’s role in boosting national revenue must be recognized, and the digital divide must be bridged.
The call to action is clear: act now, or risk being left behind. AI adoption is not just about technology—it is about national destiny. Developing nations that seize this lever will not only survive the digital age—they will thrive, becoming IT export powerhouses in a global economy hungry for innovation.
Discover more from The Economy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Inflation
Global Inflation Trends: Is the World Entering a Post-Inflation Era?
Introduction
Inflation has been the economic buzzword of the past few years. From grocery bills to mortgage payments, households across the globe have felt the sting of rising prices. Central banks scrambled to raise interest rates, governments rolled out subsidies, and businesses struggled to balance costs with consumer demand. Yet, as we step into 2025, a new question emerges: are we entering a post-inflation era?
This opinion piece explores the shifting dynamics of global inflation, the forces driving disinflation, and whether the world is truly moving beyond the inflationary storm — or simply pausing before the next wave.
🌍 The Inflationary Storm of the Early 2020s
- Pandemic Aftershocks: COVID-19 disrupted supply chains, creating shortages in everything from semiconductors to food staples.
- Energy Crisis: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine triggered spikes in oil and gas prices, fueling inflation worldwide.
- Monetary Policy Lag: Central banks initially underestimated inflation, labeling it “transitory.” By the time they acted, prices had already surged.
- Consumer Behavior: Pent-up demand after lockdowns led to spending sprees, further pushing prices upward.
The result? Inflation rates hit multi-decade highs in the US, Europe, and emerging markets, including Pakistan.
📉 Signs of Disinflation in 2025
Now, the tide seems to be turning. Several indicators suggest inflation is cooling:
- Falling Energy Prices: Oil and gas markets have stabilized, with renewables cushioning supply shocks.
- Supply Chain Recovery: Logistics bottlenecks have eased, reducing costs for manufacturers and consumers.
- Central Bank Tightening: Aggressive interest rate hikes are finally curbing demand.
- Technological Deflation: AI, automation, and digitalization are lowering production costs.
These factors hint at a possible post-inflation era, where price stability returns as the norm.
⚖️ The Case for a Post-Inflation Era
- Global Coordination: Central banks are more vigilant, ready to act swiftly against inflation.
- Energy Transition: Renewables reduce dependence on volatile fossil fuels.
- Demographics: Aging populations in advanced economies dampen demand growth.
- Technology: AI-driven productivity gains create deflationary pressures.
Together, these forces could usher in a period of low and stable inflation, reminiscent of the pre-pandemic decade.
🚨 Counterarguments: Inflation Isn’t Dead Yet
However, declaring victory over inflation may be premature.
- Geopolitical Risks: Conflicts in the Middle East or Asia could reignite energy shocks.
- Climate Change: Extreme weather events disrupt food supply, pushing prices up.
- Fiscal Pressures: Governments burdened with debt may resort to money printing.
- Emerging Market Volatility: Countries like Pakistan remain vulnerable to currency depreciation and imported inflation.
In other words, inflation may be subdued, but it’s far from extinct.
🏠 Human Impact: Why This Debate Matters
For households, inflation isn’t just an abstract number. It’s the difference between affording a home, saving for retirement, or putting food on the table.
- Middle-Class Squeeze: Even modest inflation erodes purchasing power.
- Youth & Employment: Rising costs affect job creation and wages.
- Retirees: Pension reforms become critical in safeguarding against inflation shocks.
Thus, whether we’re entering a post-inflation era directly affects everyday lives.
📊 Regional Perspectives
- United States: Inflation cooling, but housing remains expensive.
- Europe: Energy stabilization helps, but fiscal deficits loom.
- China: Facing deflationary pressures due to slowing demand.
- Pakistan: Inflation remains sticky due to currency weakness and structural issues.
This divergence shows that while some economies may enjoy disinflation, others remain trapped in inflationary cycles.
✍️ Opinion: A Fragile Post-Inflation Era
My view? The world is not entering a permanent post-inflation era, but rather a fragile disinflationary phase. Structural forces like technology and demographics will keep inflation subdued, but shocks — geopolitical, climate, or fiscal — can quickly reverse the trend.
The challenge for policymakers is to balance vigilance with flexibility. For households and businesses, the lesson is clear: don’t assume inflation is gone; prepare for its return.
📢 Conclusion
The narrative of a “post-inflation era” is tempting, offering hope after years of economic pain. Yet, history teaches us that inflation is cyclical, not linear. While 2025 may mark a turning point toward stability, the world must remain cautious.
In the end, the question isn’t whether inflation is dead — it’s whether we’ve learned enough to manage it better next time.
Discover more from The Economy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
-
Governance19 hours agoPakistan’s Corruption Perception 2025: A Wake-Up Call for Reform and Accountability
-
Events2 days ago🌍 Davos 2026: The World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Sets the Stage for Global Transformation
-
Global Economy2 days agoUnlocking the Future of IT Exports: AI Surge as the Blueprint for Economic Growth
-
Inflation2 days agoGlobal Inflation Trends: Is the World Entering a Post-Inflation Era?
-
Mergers2 days ago$108B Takeover War: Skydance Bids for WBD After Paramount Deal
-
Opinion2 days agoPakistan’s Solar Push: Can Renewables Power Growth?
-
Opinion3 days agoPension reforms or financial massacre?
-
Opinion3 days agoThe rot beneath the bailout
