Connect with us

Banks

The World’s Top 10 Banks in 2025: Power, Risk, and the New Financial Order

Published

on

China’s trillion-dollar banking giants dominate global finance—but their real estate exposure could reshape the entire system

The global banking landscape has reached an inflection point. As we close 2025, the world’s 100 largest banks control $95.5 trillion in assets—a figure that eclipses the GDP of most nations combined. Yet beneath this staggering concentration of financial power lies a paradox that should concern policymakers and investors alike: the banks with the biggest balance sheets may not be the most resilient.

Four Chinese state-owned institutions—Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Agricultural Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Bank of China—occupy the top spots in the global rankings by total assets. Meanwhile, JPMorgan Chase, the largest U.S. bank and fifth globally, commands the highest market capitalization at nearly $788 billion, signaling that investors value American banking efficiency over sheer size.

This divergence tells us something critical: in 2025’s banking world, scale and strength are no longer synonymous.

The Rankings: Size Doesn’t Equal Safety

Based on the latest data from S&P Global Market Intelligence and financial reports through Q4 2024, here are the world’s ten largest banks by total assets:

1. Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) – $6.6 trillion in assets. The world’s largest bank by assets continues to benefit from Beijing’s infrastructure spending and state support, operating over 16,000 branches globally. Yet non-performing loan ratios are forecast to rise to 5.4-5.8% in 2025-2027, up from 5.1% in 2024, driven primarily by real estate exposure.

2. Agricultural Bank of China – Approximately $5.8 trillion. Deeply embedded in rural China’s financial system, ABC faces similar real estate headwinds while supporting Beijing’s rural development priorities.

3. China Construction Bank – Around $5.6 trillion. As its name suggests, CCB’s fortunes are intimately tied to China’s construction sector, making it particularly vulnerable to the ongoing property crisis.

4. Bank of China – Approximately $4.8 trillion. The most internationally oriented of China’s “Big Four,” with significant foreign operations, yet still carrying substantial domestic real estate exposure.

5. JPMorgan Chase – $4.0 trillion in assets. The most profitable large bank globally, JPMorgan’s return on equity reached 18% in 2024, demonstrating that American banks achieve more with less. With 5,021 domestic branches and sophisticated digital platforms, JPMorgan exemplifies the “smaller but mightier” model.

6. Bank of America – $2.65 trillion. The second-largest U.S. bank maintains 3,624 domestic branches and has aggressively invested in digital banking, serving millions through its AI-powered virtual assistant Erica.

7. HSBC Holdings – $3.0 trillion. Europe’s largest bank by assets, HSBC is navigating a strategic pivot toward Asia while managing legacy exposures across its global footprint.

8. BNP Paribas – Approximately $2.9 trillion. France’s largest bank and a European leader in investment banking and corporate finance.

9. Crédit Agricole – Around $2.6 trillion. Another French banking giant with significant retail and corporate banking operations across Europe.

10. Citigroup – $1.84 trillion. Once the world’s largest bank, Citi has streamlined operations but maintains an unparalleled global presence with operations in 109 foreign branches.

The Elephant in the Boardroom: China’s Real Estate Time Bomb

Here’s what the asset rankings don’t show: Chinese banks’ exposure to real estate loans has created systemic vulnerabilities, with non-performing asset ratios for property development loans potentially reaching 7% by 2027 if markets stabilize—and much worse if they don’t.

Walk through any major Chinese city today and you’ll see the problem in concrete and steel: unfinished apartment towers, silent construction sites, and the ghostly remains of a $52 trillion property bubble that’s now deflating. Chinese policymakers removed price caps on housing in 2024, allowing eligible families to buy unlimited homes in suburban areas, a desperate attempt to revive demand that has largely failed.

The human cost is staggering. Mid-2025 data shows mortgage non-performing loan rates at listed banks rising overall, with some banks up more than 20 basis points. Millions of Chinese homeowners now hold “underwater” mortgages—properties worth less than their outstanding loans. Some have lost both their homes and down payments yet still owe banks hundreds of thousands of yuan.

For the Big Four Chinese banks, this isn’t just a loan quality issue—it’s an existential question. Banks’ exposure to housing and local government debt declined to 20.7% in Q4 2024 from 22.2% a year earlier, but that still represents trillions in potentially troubled assets. Beijing’s response? Issuing 500 billion yuan in special treasury bonds in 2025 to support bank recapitalization.

Think about that for a moment. The government that owns these banks is now having to inject capital into them to cover losses from lending that the government itself encouraged. It’s a circular firing squad of state capitalism.

American Excellence: Smaller, Smarter, More Profitable

Cross the Pacific and the banking model looks radically different. JPMorgan Chase’s annualized return on equity for Q2 2025 was 16.93%, a performance Chinese banks can only dream of. With roughly $4 trillion in assets—a third of ICBC’s size—JPMorgan generated comparable or superior profits through better risk management, superior technology, and diversified revenue streams.

American banks aren’t perfect. They face their own challenges: rising commercial real estate defaults, regulatory uncertainty around the Basel III endgame rules, and fierce competition from fintech disruptors. Yet their fundamental business model—strict capital requirements, transparent accounting, and market discipline—creates resilience.

The regulatory framework matters enormously. Basel III requires banks to maintain a minimum Common Equity Tier 1 ratio at all times, plus a mandatory capital conservation buffer equivalent to at least 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. U.S. implementation has been stricter than in many jurisdictions, forcing American banks to hold more capital but also making them genuinely safer.

Compare this to China, where banks have remained cautious about new property exposure, transferring housing risks to non-bank financial institutions. That’s not risk management—that’s risk concealment. The leverage doesn’t disappear; it just moves to less regulated corners of the financial system.

The Digital Divide: Innovation as the New Moat

Size and capital strength matter, but in 2025, technological sophistication increasingly separates winners from also-rans. DBS Bank’s AI investments are projected to reach 750 million Singapore dollars (about $577 million) in 2024 and surpass SG$1 billion in 2025. The Singapore-based bank has deployed over 1,500 AI and machine learning models across 370 use cases, from corporate risk assessment to customer service.

JPMorgan and Bank of America aren’t far behind. BofA’s Erica virtual assistant has handled billions of customer interactions, while JPMorgan uses AI for everything from fraud detection to trading strategies. Only 8% of banks were developing generative AI systematically in 2024, with 78% taking a tactical approach, but that’s changing rapidly.

The Chinese banks? They’re investing heavily in digital infrastructure, to be sure. Yet their technology serves a fundamentally different purpose: facilitating state-directed lending, monitoring transactions for political purposes, and supporting Beijing’s social credit systems. Innovation, yes—but innovation in service of control rather than customer value.

European banks occupy an uncomfortable middle ground. BBVA’s expansion of its OpenAI collaboration will see ChatGPT Enterprise rolled out to all 120,000 global employees, signaling serious AI ambitions. Yet European banks collectively lag their American and Asian peers in both investment and implementation.

Basel III Endgame: The Regulatory Reckoning

Speaking of uncomfortable positions, let’s address the regulatory elephant: the Basel III endgame. Under the original proposal, large banks would begin transitioning to the new framework on July 1, 2025, with full compliance starting July 1, 2028. The proposal would have resulted in an aggregate 16% increase in common equity tier 1 capital requirements for affected bank holding companies.

But here’s the twist: US regulators recently proposed to reduce capital requirements on the largest banks, bowing to intense industry lobbying and political pressure. The revised proposal now calls for only a 9% increase for global systemically important banks—still significant, but less onerous than originally planned.

This compromise may prove disastrous. The average leverage ratio of US global systemically important banks declined from a 2016 peak of 9% to about 7% in 2023 and has remained there. Banks have been gaming the system, increasing risk exposure while maintaining superficially healthy risk-weighted capital ratios.

Meanwhile, the European Central Bank and Bank of England have delayed their Basel III implementation, citing US inaction. We’re witnessing a potential regulatory race to the bottom—exactly what the Basel framework was designed to prevent.

The Geopolitical Wildcard: Trade, Tariffs, and Banking Stress

Banking doesn’t happen in a vacuum. International trade disputes and changes in tariffs are expected to influence the performance of banks, impacting asset quality and growth potential. If U.S.-China trade tensions escalate further—a real possibility given recent political developments—Chinese banks will feel the pain first and hardest.

Reciprocal tariffs between the US and China are exerting pressure on Chinese banks, particularly due to declining demand from export-oriented manufacturers. When factories close or cut production, loan defaults follow. It’s Economics 101, but at a scale that could destabilize the entire Chinese banking system.

American banks have their own trade exposure, of course, but it’s more diversified and often hedged. JPMorgan operates in over 100 countries. Citi, despite its shrinking footprint, remains the most truly global bank. They have options. Chinese banks, despite their size, remain heavily dependent on the domestic economy.

What This Means for 2026 and Beyond

So where does this leave us? Here’s my take, informed by twenty years covering this beat:

First, asset size is an increasingly misleading metric. ICBC’s $6.6 trillion balance sheet looks impressive until you examine what’s actually on it. Quality trumps quantity, and American banks demonstrate this daily through superior profitability and resilience.

Second, the Chinese banking system faces a reckoning. It’s not a matter of if, but when and how severe. Chinese banks were sitting on 3.2 trillion yuan ($440 billion) worth of bad loans by the end of September—a 33% increase from pre-Covid times. These numbers, from the banks themselves, are almost certainly understated.

Third, technology is creating a two-tier banking world. Banks that aggressively adopt AI, blockchain, and advanced analytics will dominate. Those that don’t will become utilities—low-margin, heavily regulated, and perpetually vulnerable to disruption.

Fourth, regulatory arbitrage is back with a vengeance. The Basel III endgame was supposed to eliminate it. Instead, we’re seeing regulators water down requirements in response to bank lobbying. This should terrify anyone who remembers 2008.

Finally, geopolitics increasingly dictates banking success. In an era of great power competition, owning a bank in Shanghai or New York means different things. Chinese banks serve the state; American banks serve shareholders (at least theoretically). European banks are caught in between, trying to navigate relationships with both powers while maintaining independence.

The Billion-Dollar Question

Here’s what keeps me up at night: We’ve seen this movie before. Massive banks, seemingly too big to fail, carrying hidden risks that regulators either can’t see or choose to ignore. Policymakers convinced that “this time is different” because of better capital rules, smarter supervision, or more sophisticated risk management.

It never is.

The difference in 2025 is that the risks are concentrated in banks that operate under fundamentally different rules. When—not if—the Chinese property crisis forces Beijing to choose between bank bailouts and economic growth, the ripples will reach far beyond Asia.

The world’s largest 100 banks account for $95.5 trillion in assets, up 3% year over year. That’s growth, yes, but it’s also concentration. Too much power, in too few hands, making too many bets on too few assumptions.

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, likes to say his bank could survive another 2008-style crisis. He’s probably right—JPMorgan is genuinely well-capitalized and well-managed. But could the global financial system survive a crisis originating in China’s $6 trillion banking sector?

That’s the question that should haunt every central banker and finance minister. Because in 2025, we’re not just worried about banks that are too big to fail. We’re worried about banks that are too big, too opaque, and too politically connected for anyone to fully understand the risks they carry.

The world’s top ten banks in 2025 aren’t just financial institutions. They’re nodes in a global system where everyone’s connected to everyone else through invisible chains of credit, derivatives, and counterparty risk. Pull one thread, and you might unravel the whole sweater.

Sleep tight.


The author is a Senior Opinion Columnist specializing in global finance and policy. Views expressed are personal.


Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Analysis

7 Ways Tech Startups Are Revolutionizing Pakistan’s Financial Ecosystem in 2026

Published

on

Let’s Explore how Pakistan’s fintech startups are transforming financial inclusion, payments, SME lending, and digital banking in 2026—with real data, key players, and policy insights driving the country’s $4B startup ecosystem.

Picture Amna, a small-scale textile vendor in Faisalabad’s crowded bazaar. Three years ago, she kept her earnings in a tin box under the shop counter—unbanked, invisible to the formal economy, and locked out of credit. Today, she processes supplier invoices digitally, accesses working capital within 24 hours, and tracks her cash flow on a smartphone app. Amna didn’t walk into a bank branch. A startup came to her.

This is the quiet revolution reshaping Pakistan’s financial landscape. With VC-backed startups now collectively valued at around $4 billion—up 3.6 times since 2020—Pakistan’s growth rate outpaces larger ecosystems including India, New York, and Dubai, positioning it among emerging “New Frontier” tech markets Profit by Pakistan Today. Yet for all the momentum, no unicorn has emerged yet, the funding gap at growth stages remains acute, and roughly 85% of transactions still move in cash. The gap between potential and reality is precisely where startups are doing their most consequential work.

Here are seven ways Pakistan’s tech startups are rewriting the rules of finance in 2026—and why global investors and policymakers should be paying close attention.

1. Expanding Financial Inclusion Beyond Urban Walls

Pakistan’s financial exclusion problem is, at its core, a distribution problem. Traditional banks have concentrated their branch networks in major cities, leaving vast swathes of rural Punjab, interior Sindh, and Balochistan underserved. Pakistan aims to increase adult financial inclusion to 75% by 2028, up from 64% currently, with 143 million broadband and 193 million cellular subscribers forming the digital infrastructure to get there. Invest2Innovate

Startups are filling this gap with mobile-first models that don’t require a bank branch, a credit history, or even a formal ID in some pilots. Easypaisa—Pakistan’s largest mobile wallet—has evolved from simple bill payments into a comprehensive financial super-app covering government disbursements, QR payments, and international remittances. JazzCash serves tens of millions of users across peri-urban and rural markets. Meanwhile, newer entrants like Paymo are targeting digital-native youth with social banking features designed for Gen Z’s financial behaviours.

The economics here are compelling on a global scale. Bangladesh’s bKash built a $2 billion enterprise on mobile financial services for an underserved population—a playbook Pakistan’s ecosystem is now iterating and improving upon. The difference is that Pakistan’s startups are layering artificial intelligence and embedded finance on top of basic wallet infrastructure, building toward something more sophisticated than simple cash transfers.

2. Reinventing B2B Payments and Supply Chain Finance

If consumer fintech is the visible face of Pakistan’s digital finance revolution, B2B infrastructure is its beating engine. Haball is perhaps the most striking example. The Karachi-based fintech has raised a $52 million Pre-Series A round led by Zayn VC and backed by Meezan Bank, scaled its platform to handle over $3 billion in payments, and disbursed more than $110 million in financing to thousands of SMEs and multinational clients. Daftarkhwan

What Haball is doing—digitizing the order-to-cash cycle across Pakistan’s vast informal supply chains—addresses a structural inefficiency that has cost the economy billions in idle working capital and reconciliation errors. By automating invoicing, digitizing trade flows, and embedding Shariah-compliant financing into the transaction itself, Haball turns every payment into a data point for underwriting the next loan.

The implications extend well beyond individual deals. Pakistan’s informal sector accounts for over 40% of GDP, and much of that informality is driven by opaque supply chains and the friction of cash. When startups digitize these flows, they don’t just solve a payments problem—they bring entire economic layers into visibility, taxation, and formal credit assessment for the first time.

3. Accelerating Digital Remittances and Cross-Border Finance

Remittances are Pakistan’s economic lifeline. At roughly $30 billion annually, they outpace foreign direct investment and are equivalent to nearly 8% of GDP. Yet the infrastructure carrying this money has historically been dominated by expensive incumbents—hawala networks and legacy wire services that extract 5–7% in transfer fees from workers sending money home from the Gulf, UK, and North America.

Startups are beginning to disrupt this. Platforms like SadaPay are digitizing international remittances, reducing friction and cost for Pakistani diaspora communities. Invest2Innovate The company’s trajectory also illustrates the ecosystem’s volatility—SadaPay faced staff reductions following its acquisition by Turkish fintech Papara, underscoring how consolidation is beginning to reshape the competitive landscape even in early-stage markets.

Pakistan’s Raast instant payment system, launched by the State Bank of Pakistan and inspired by India’s Unified Payments Interface, is now the backbone connecting digital remittance platforms to beneficiary accounts in real time. The combination of a robust central rails infrastructure and agile startup players building on top of it creates the conditions for the kind of remittance cost compression India achieved within five years of launching UPI—a development that could redirect hundreds of millions of dollars in annual transfer fees back into Pakistani household budgets.

4. Unlocking Capital for Small and Medium Enterprises

SMEs account for roughly 90% of businesses in Pakistan and contribute around 40% of GDP, yet they receive less than 10% of total bank credit. The reasons are well-documented: lack of collateral, informal accounting, no credit history, and risk-averse bank lending desks that simply aren’t calibrated for small-ticket loans. This is where Pakistan’s credit-tech and embedded finance startups are making their most economically significant interventions.

Startups like CreditBook provide micro-loans to SMEs and individuals excluded from traditional banking, while Abhi innovates payroll financing, NayaPay supports SME financial management, and Mahana Wealth promotes saving among the underserved. Invest2Innovate Abhi, founded in 2021, has now raised $57.8 million for its financial wellness platform—making it one of the best-capitalised fintech startups in the country.

The pivot toward hybrid financing models is itself a structural innovation. Pakistan’s startups raised approximately $74.2 million in reported funding in 2025, almost double the funds mobilised in 2024, with the increase driven by hybrid financing—combinations of equity and debt—replacing the previous equity-only funding approach. Business Recorder This mirrors what development finance institutions have long advocated: blended finance structures that reduce first-loss risk and unlock private capital at scale. When applied at the SME lending level, the same logic holds.

5. Building Regulatory Infrastructure That Enables—Not Just Constrains—Innovation

A startup ecosystem is only as strong as the regulatory framework it operates within. Pakistan has not always been known for nimble financial regulation, but the State Bank of Pakistan has been quietly constructing an architecture that is beginning to attract serious attention.

The SBP’s regulatory sandbox, launched to allow fintechs to test innovations under controlled conditions without full licensing requirements, has been central to this shift. SBP’s frameworks have created a supportive environment, positioning Pakistan as a promising fintech market. Invest2Innovate The central bank’s digital banking licensing framework, which has drawn applications from a growing cohort of neobank candidates, represents a further commitment to structured innovation rather than arbitrary prohibition.

Globally, the contrast with peer markets is instructive. Bangladesh’s fintech growth was turbocharged by its own regulatory openness to mobile financial services—a decade ago, a decision considered brave at the time. Nigeria’s central bank took a more restrictive path and watched significant fintech capital flow to Ghana and Kenya instead. Pakistan’s regulators appear to have absorbed these lessons, even if implementation speed remains a work in progress. One of the most notable structural shifts in 2026 is the rise of hybrid financing models and growing interest from bilateral and multilateral development finance institutions in supporting Pakistan’s startup ecosystem. Startup

6. Driving Islamic Fintech as a Global Differentiator

Pakistan is home to 230+ million Muslims, and its financial system has a constitutional obligation to move toward interest-free models. This is not merely a regulatory constraint—it is a market opportunity of extraordinary scale that global Islamic finance players have barely begun to exploit at the retail level.

Haball’s Shariah-compliant supply chain financing is one marker of this trend. But the opportunity extends much further: Murabaha-structured digital lending, Musharaka-based equity crowdfunding, and Sukuk tokenization on blockchain rails are all adjacent spaces where Pakistani startups have structural advantages that competitors in secular financial systems simply don’t possess.

Islamic fintech, AI-driven credit systems, open banking, and cross-border payments are identified as the four major growth frontiers for Pakistan’s fintech ecosystem. Startup With the global Islamic finance industry valued at over $3 trillion and growing at 10–12% annually, Pakistani startups that develop credible, scalable models in this space are building for an export market as much as a domestic one—positioning Pakistan as a potential hub for Islamic fintech products serving markets from Indonesia to Morocco.

7. Creating Jobs, Skills, and a Self-Sustaining Innovation Flywheel

Economic ecosystems don’t grow linearly—they compound. The most durable contribution Pakistan’s tech startup sector is making to its financial ecosystem isn’t any single product or funding round. It is the accumulation of human capital: engineers, product managers, compliance specialists, data scientists, and founders gaining experience that will seed the next generation of ventures.

There are now 170+ VC-backed startups across Pakistan, with 13 “Colts” generating $25–100 million in annual revenue and 17 breakouts having raised between $15 million and $100 million. Startup Each of these companies is a training ground. When engineers leave Haball or NayaPay to start their own ventures, they carry institutional knowledge—of regulatory navigation, of underwriting logic, of enterprise sales in a cash-heavy economy—that accelerates their next company’s time to product-market fit.

Funding to female-founded or co-founded startups nearly doubled, rising from $5.5 million in 2024 to $10.1 million in 2025 Business Recorder, though the average deal size for women-led ventures remains smaller, signalling that inclusion in the ecosystem is widening even as capital parity remains elusive. This trajectory matters: research from McKinsey and the IFC consistently shows that more diverse founding teams produce more resilient companies and broader economic multipliers.

The Road Ahead: From Momentum to Transformation

Pakistan’s fintech story in 2026 is one of real but fragile progress. The country’s $4 billion ecosystem could scale rapidly over the next five to seven years with deeper growth capital and large exits—but the funding gap at later stages remains the primary bottleneck, with no company yet earning more than $100 million in annual revenue or reaching unicorn status. Profit by Pakistan Today

The comparison with India is both inspiring and sobering. India’s fintech ecosystem generated over $9 billion in venture funding in 2021 alone, supported by a government that treated UPI as strategic infrastructure and built policy frameworks that pulled private capital in behind. Pakistan’s policymakers have the blueprint. What they lack is the same scale of conviction in execution.

For international investors—particularly development finance institutions, Gulf sovereign wealth funds, and impact-oriented funds looking at frontier markets—Pakistan represents a rare combination: a massive underserved population, a young and mobile-connected demographic pyramid, a regulatory environment trending toward openness, and startup teams with demonstrably world-class technical ambition. The risk is real. So is the asymmetry.

A Call to Action

For policymakers: Accelerate the implementation of open banking frameworks and extend the SBP’s digital banking licensing to include regionally focused neobanks targeting rural communities. Treat financial infrastructure—Raast, digital identity, data-sharing rails—as public goods requiring sustained government investment, not one-time pilot programmes.

For investors: The window for early growth-stage capital in Pakistan’s fintech sector is open and underappreciated. The startups that survive the current funding gap will emerge stronger, leaner, and with defensible market positions. Patient capital with local ecosystem partnerships is the model that will generate both returns and development impact.

For entrepreneurs: The infrastructure is improving. The regulatory environment is becoming more navigable. The market is enormous, largely untapped, and increasingly digital. Pakistan’s first fintech unicorn is not a question of whether—it is a question of when, and who.

Amna in Faisalabad is already there. The rest of Pakistan’s financial system is catching up to her.


Sources and data cited from: Pakistan Tech Report, Dealroom.co & inDrive, January 2026; invest2innovate (i2i) 2025 Ecosystem Report; i2i Fintech Landscape Report; Tracxn Pakistan FinTech Data, January 2026; Daftarkhwan: Top Pakistani Startups 2026; Startup.pk VC Ecosystem Report; World Bank Financial Inclusion Data.


Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Analysis

Pakistan’s SBP Reserves Climb to $16.2 Billion: Analyzing the Latest Forex Update and Its Economic Implications

Published

on

Pakistan’s foreign exchange reserves held by the State Bank of Pakistan edged up to $16.20 billion in the week ended February 13, 2026 — a number that, while modest in isolation, tells a larger story of structural stabilization, IMF discipline, and a country carefully rebuilding its financial credibility after one of the most severe balance-of-payments crises in its modern history.

A Week-on-Week Gain That Signals Quiet Confidence

The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) reported on Thursday that its foreign exchange reserves increased by $19 million during the week ended February 13, 2026, reaching $16,196.9 million ($16.20 billion). Pakistan’s total liquid foreign exchange reserves — which include SBP holdings and net reserves held by commercial banks — stood at $21,301.5 million ($21.30 billion). Of that combined figure, commercial banks held $5,104.6 million ($5.10 billion), a decline of approximately $92.3 million week-on-week, partially offsetting the central bank’s gain.

The weekly increase is unremarkable in size but remarkable in what it represents: the ninth consecutive week of positive movement in SBP-held reserves. Strip away the noise, and a clear trend emerges — Pakistan is steadily, if cautiously, replenishing the reserve buffers it nearly exhausted during the 2022–23 crisis.

The Weekly Data in Context: A Reserve Trajectory Table

The latest SBP reserves update gains considerably more meaning when viewed against the recent weekly trajectory:

Week EndingSBP Reserves (USD mn)Weekly Change (USD mn)
February 13, 202616,196.9+19.1
February 6, 202616,177.8+21.0
January 30, 202616,157.2+56.0
January 23, 202616,101.1+13.0
January 16, 202616,087.7+16.0
January 9, 202616,071.8+16.0
Week of Dec. 19, 2025*16,055.7+141.0
Week of Dec. 12, 2025*15,915.1+13.0
Week of Dec. 5, 2025*15,902.5+16.0
Late November 202515,886.8+1,300.0 (IMF tranche)

Dates approximate based on SBP release sequence. Source: State Bank of Pakistan

The late-November spike — a $1.3 billion jump — represents the single most consequential data point in this series. The SBP confirmed that the weekly increase was mainly due to the receipt of SDR 914 million, equivalent to about $1.2 billion, from the IMF under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) and the Resilience and Sustainability Facility (RSF). Everything since then has been organic accumulation: modest but persistent gains averaging roughly $20–25 million per week, a cadence that speaks to improved external inflows rather than one-off injections.

The IMF Scaffolding: What’s Holding the Recovery Up

No serious analysis of Pakistan’s latest SBP reserves update can ignore the role of the International Monetary Fund in engineering the turnaround. Pakistan’s 37-month EFF was approved on September 25, 2024, and aims to build resilience and enable sustainable growth, with key priorities including rebuilding international reserve buffers and broadening the tax base. Gross reserves stood at $14.5 billion at end-FY25, up from $9.4 billion a year earlier, and are projected to continue to be rebuilt in FY26 and over the medium term.

That $9.4 billion-to-$16.2 billion trajectory over roughly eighteen months is striking. But it would be naive to frame it purely as success. Much of the gain reflects the $7 billion IMF program’s front-loaded disbursements — the IMF’s total commitment to Pakistan comprises $5.2 billion under the Extended Fund Facility and $1.4 billion through the Resilience and Sustainability Facility, aimed at strengthening the country’s foreign exchange reserves. A third review is scheduled for March 2026, which, if cleared, would entitle Pakistan to an additional ~$1.04 billion under the EFF and ~$211 million through the RSF. The market is watching.

The IMF has not been ungenerous with its praise, but it has also not been vague about its expectations. IMF officials noted that Pakistan’s reform implementation under the EFF has helped preserve macroeconomic stability, with real GDP growth accelerating, inflation expectations remaining anchored, and fiscal and external imbalances continuing to moderate. The subtext is clear: continued disbursements are contingent on continued discipline.

Remittances: The Underrated Engine

Beneath the IMF headline, a quieter but arguably more sustainable driver has been building momentum: overseas remittances. Pakistan’s remittances are projected to exceed $41 billion in 2026, marking a notable increase from $38 billion last year. Remittances currently account for roughly 7–8% of Pakistan’s GDP — a lifeline that, unlike IMF tranches, does not add to the country’s external debt stock.

January 2026 reinforced this picture dramatically. Pakistan received $3.5 billion in foreign remittances in January 2026, and the country recorded a current account surplus of $121 million in January, compared to a current account deficit of $393 million in the same month last year. That is not merely a number — it is a reversal. A year ago, Pakistan was hemorrhaging foreign exchange; today, it is generating a current account surplus. The improvement was attributed to stronger remittance inflows and a rebound in exports, which crossed the $3 billion mark for the first time in January to reach $3.061 billion, compared to $2.27 billion in December 2025.

With Ramazan beginning in late February and Eid ul-Fitr approaching in late March, seasonal remittance spikes — historically the largest of any year — could provide another meaningful uplift to reserves in the coming weeks. Overseas Pakistanis tend to send significantly more money home ahead of major religious observances, and given the scale of the diaspora across the Gulf, the UK, and North America, this annual inflow is no trivial variable.

Pakistan Economy Recovery: The Macro Backdrop

Understanding the latest Pakistan total liquid reserves 2026 data requires contextualizing it within a broader macroeconomic stabilization story that, just two years ago, looked anything but inevitable.

In 2022–23, Pakistan’s foreign exchange reserves fell to dangerously low levels — at one point covering less than one month of imports. The rupee collapsed. Inflation surged above 38%. The IMF had to be called in under emergency conditions. Pakistan’s import cover — a key indicator of external sector strength — stood at less than one month during the 2022–23 crisis period; it has since climbed to approximately 2.5 months. At the current trajectory, the SBP’s own upgraded forecast of reaching $17.8 billion by June 2026 would push import cover comfortably above three months — the IMF’s benchmark for adequate reserve buffers.

The IMF projects Pakistan’s current account deficit for FY25 at about $0.2 billion, or 0.1 percent of GDP, helped by resilient exports and a stronger remittance outlook, as improved macro and FX stability has supported a rebound in remittance inflows through formal channels. These projections, calibrated conservatively, now look increasingly optimistic given January’s current account surplus.

However, analysts caution that the road ahead is not without hazard. External debt repayments remain elevated. Import demand — deliberately suppressed during the crisis — is beginning to recover as the economy grows, which will widen the current account deficit over the medium term. Over the medium term, the current account deficit is expected to widen modestly to around 1 percent of GDP as imports rebound. Sustaining the reserve build-up will require export growth and continued structural reforms, not just remittance windfalls and IMF tranches.

The Commercial Bank Divergence: A Nuance Worth Noting

One detail in Thursday’s release deserves closer scrutiny. While SBP-held reserves rose by $19.1 million, net foreign reserves held by commercial banks fell by $92.3 million to $5,104.6 million. Total liquid reserves consequently declined week-on-week from $21.374 billion to $21.301 billion — a net reduction of $73.2 million.

This divergence matters. Commercial bank reserves are typically more volatile, influenced by import payments, letter of credit settlements, and short-term capital movements. Their decline in the same week that the central bank gained suggests that private sector foreign currency demand — for trade financing and external payments — is picking up. This is broadly consistent with an economy that is beginning to return to a more normal import cycle. It is not a red flag. But it is a reminder that the $16.2 billion SBP headline and the $21.3 billion total liquid figure tell somewhat different stories about where Pakistan’s foreign exchange reserves impact on economy is most acutely felt.

Bond Market Sentiment and Foreign Inflows

Pakistan’s bond market has undergone a dramatic repricing over the past twelve months. After years of yields in double digits — partly reflecting credit risk premiums that placed Pakistani sovereign debt in near-junk territory — foreign inflows into Pakistan bonds have been recovering as investor confidence improves. The IMF program’s credibility, declining inflation, and a more stable rupee have all contributed.

Pakistan’s economy grew an estimated 2.4 percent in FY25, up from 0.3 percent in the previous fiscal year, as inflation cooled and the rupee stabilized after a steep depreciation cycle in 2022–23. The improvement in external buffers is likely to boost investor sentiment at a time when the government is stepping up efforts to attract foreign direct investment and privatize state-owned enterprises.

For global investors scanning South Asian sovereign debt, Pakistan presents a complicated but increasingly interesting risk-reward proposition. The EFF program provides a backstop. The reserve trajectory is improving. But political risk, energy sector liabilities, and the scale of pending structural reforms — particularly on taxation and state-owned enterprise privatization — remain substantive concerns that no amount of weekly reserve data can fully paper over.

What This Means for Everyday Pakistanis

The relevance of the latest SBP foreign exchange reserves weekly data extends far beyond financial markets. For ordinary Pakistanis, reserve levels are a proxy for economic stability in the most direct sense.

When reserves are low, the rupee weakens, import costs rise, and inflation — particularly in food and energy — accelerates. The 2022–23 crisis saw petrol shortages and cooking oil price spikes that hit the country’s most economically vulnerable citizens hardest. Conversely, as reserves strengthen, the SBP has greater capacity to manage exchange rate volatility, facilitating the import of raw materials for industry, medicines, and consumer goods at more stable prices.

With remittances hitting $3.5 billion in January alone, families receiving overseas transfers are also seeing more purchasing power — dollars converted at a more stable exchange rate translate into more rupees, more household spending, and more local economic activity. This virtuous cycle, fragile as it remains, is more visible now than at any point in the past three years.

Forward Outlook: The $17.8 Billion Target and the Risks

The SBP’s own forecast — foreign exchange reserves reaching $17.8 billion by June 2026, up from a previous estimate of $17.5 billion — follows a controlled current account deficit and the realisation of planned official inflows. Achieving that target from the current $16.2 billion would require an additional $1.6 billion over roughly four months, or approximately $400 million per month. Given recent monthly inflow dynamics — remittances, IMF disbursements pending the March review, and bilateral inflows — the target appears achievable, but not guaranteed.

Key Data Summary (Week Ended February 13, 2026)

MetricValue
SBP-held FX reserves$16,196.9 million ($16.20 billion)
Net reserves — commercial banks$5,104.6 million ($5.10 billion)
Total liquid foreign reserves$21,301.5 million ($21.30 billion)
Week-on-week SBP change+$19.1 million (+0.12%)
Week-on-week commercial bank change-$92.3 million
Week-on-week total liquid change-$73.2 million
SBP FX reserves forecast (June 2026)$17.8 billion

Source: State Bank of Pakistan official weekly release, February 19, 2026

Key risks to the upside scenario include: a deterioration in the IMF relationship that delays the March 2026 review; an oil price spike that widens the import bill; or a global risk-off episode that triggers capital outflows from emerging markets. On the upside, a successful Eurobond issuance or Panda bond placement — discussed in IMF program documents — could provide a step-change in the reserve buffer.

Conclusion: Rebuilding Credibility, One Week at a Time

Pakistan’s $16.2 billion in SBP-held reserves and $21.3 billion in total liquid foreign exchange reserves are, in the grand sweep of emerging-market economics, modest numbers. They pale against India’s $640+ billion reserve war chest, or even Bangladesh’s more insulated external position. But for a country that was, less than three years ago, teetering on the edge of a sovereign default scenario, they represent something more important than a number: they represent the painstaking reconstruction of credibility.

That credibility — with the IMF, with international bond investors, with the Pakistani diaspora deciding whether to remit through formal channels — is what ultimately underpins the reserve trajectory. The weekly $19 million gain is a data point. The story it belongs to is a long-term stabilization project with no guarantees, but with more reason for cautious optimism today than at any point since the crisis began.

The question for policymakers, investors, and analysts alike is not whether Pakistan has turned a corner — the evidence suggests it has. The real question is whether it can hold that corner while accelerating the structural reforms that transform a reserve recovery into durable, private-sector-led growth.

The answer to that question will not arrive in a weekly reserve bulletin. But every Thursday, as the SBP releases its latest figures, it offers a small, incremental clue.


Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Analysis

Pakistan and the US Sign a Landmark Pact to Redevelop New York’s Roosevelt Hotel

Published

on

On a cold February morning in Washington, two governments separated by thousands of miles and decades of complicated diplomacy sat down to sign a piece of paper that could reshape a New York City skyline — and perhaps, the financial trajectory of a struggling South Asian economy.

On February 15, 2026, Edward C. Forst, Administrator of the US General Services Administration (GSA), and Pakistan’s Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to redevelop the storied Roosevelt Hotel in Midtown Manhattan. The ceremony, witnessed by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, unfolded under the quiet endorsement of the Trump administration — a signal, however subtle, that Washington sees economic utility in deepening ties with Islamabad. According to Reuters, the agreement marks a significant turning point in cross-border real estate deals in 2026, and possibly a template for how sovereign-owned properties in prime global cities could be unlocked for private capital.

The Roosevelt Hotel is not just real estate. It is memory, mythology, and — as Islamabad is now acutely aware — money.

A Grand Dame Reborn: What’s at Stake at 45th and Madison

Built in 1924 and named after President Theodore Roosevelt, the hotel sits at the intersection of 45th Street and Madison Avenue — one of the most commercially valuable addresses on the planet. For nearly a century, it hosted world leaders, jazz legends, and Hollywood icons. Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) acquired it in 1979, and for decades it served as both a diplomatic asset and a revenue stream for the cash-strapped national carrier.

But the Roosevelt closed its doors to guests in 2020, a casualty of both the pandemic and chronic underinvestment. In 2023, it briefly reopened as a migrant shelter — a poignant, if jarring, chapter for a property that once defined Gilded Age glamour. Since then, it has sat largely dormant, a 19-story limestone monument to unrealized potential.

That potential is now being quantified. Current plans, as reported by Dawn, envision transforming the Roosevelt into a 1.8 million square foot mixed-use tower — a vertical neighborhood combining luxury residential units, Grade-A commercial office space, retail, and possibly a reimagined hotel component. The projected joint venture (JV) is estimated at up to $5 billion, which would make it one of the most significant foreign-linked real estate transactions in New York in recent memory.

The MoU: What Was Actually Signed?

The February 15 agreement is, legally speaking, a framework — not a finalized deal. MoUs of this nature establish intent, outline due diligence parameters, and create negotiating guardrails. They are, in the parlance of real estate finance, a starting gun, not a finish line.

What makes this MoU structurally interesting is the involvement of the GSA, the federal agency that manages US government real estate and procurement. The GSA’s role suggests that American institutional backing — potentially including regulatory facilitation, zoning cooperation, or federal-level deal structuring — could be part of the equation. That’s a meaningful signal to private investors evaluating exposure to this project.

Key Facts at a Glance:

DetailInformation
MoU SignedFebruary 15, 2026
SignatoriesGSA Administrator Edward C. Forst; Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb
WitnessesPM Shehbaz Sharif; US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff
Projected JV SizeUp to $5 billion
Planned Development1.8 million sq ft mixed-use tower
Property Location45th Street & Madison Avenue, Midtown Manhattan
Current OwnerGovernment of Pakistan (via PIA subsidiary)

For Pakistan, the stakes are existential in a fiscal sense. The country has been navigating a fragile IMF programme, and monetizing sovereign assets abroad is central to its reform strategy. The Roosevelt, conservatively valued at over $500 million in land alone, represents one of the most liquid and internationally legible assets the government holds.

PIA Privatization: The Domino That Made This Possible

To understand the Roosevelt deal, you need to understand what happened in Karachi in December 2025. In one of the most consequential privatization transactions in Pakistan’s recent history, Arif Habib Corporation acquired a 75% stake in Pakistan International Airlines for Rs135 billion — approximately $480 million at prevailing exchange rates. The transaction transferred operational control of PIA, long a byword for state inefficiency, into private hands.

Arab News has noted that this privatization was a prerequisite condition quietly demanded by international creditors and reform advocates: before Pakistan could credibly claim ownership of a $5 billion Manhattan redevelopment JV, it needed to demonstrate it could execute domestic privatization cleanly. The PIA deal did exactly that.

The Roosevelt Hotel, technically held through a PIA subsidiary called Roosevelt Hotel Corporation, now sits in a transitional ownership structure. With PIA privatized, the government retains the hotel through a separate sovereign vehicle — giving Islamabad clean title to negotiate the redevelopment independently of the airline’s new private owners. That structural clarity, according to brokers cited by The Real Deal, is precisely what has allowed serious JV conversations to accelerate.

Manhattan Real Estate in 2026: The Timing Isn’t Accidental

If there was ever a moment to announce a landmark Midtown redevelopment, this is it. Manhattan’s commercial real estate market, battered through 2022 and 2023 by remote work trends and elevated interest rates, has entered what analysts at CBRE and JLL are calling a “selective recovery.” Office vacancy rates in premier Midtown submarkets have tightened meaningfully, while luxury residential demand — particularly in the 45th to 57th Street corridor — remains structurally undersupplied.

The proposed 1.8 million square foot mixed-use tower would compete in a segment of the market currently dominated by developments like One Vanderbilt and 270 Park Avenue. But the Roosevelt site carries something those glass towers cannot manufacture: history, brand equity, and a 100-year address. Developers who can weave preservation with density — retaining the landmark facade while delivering contemporary interiors — command meaningful premiums in New York’s luxury market.

NYC zoning, however, is never simple. The Roosevelt site falls under the Special Midtown District regulations, and any tower exceeding current as-of-right massing would require either a variance or a city-sanctioned Special Permit. Given the site’s landmark-adjacent status and the political visibility of a Pakistani-American JV, community board engagement and environmental review timelines could add 18 to 36 months to the development schedule. Experienced New York developers price this in; whether Islamabad’s negotiators fully have remains an open question.

The Geopolitical Subtext: Why Washington Cares

Steve Witkoff’s presence at the MoU signing deserves a second look. As President Trump’s Special Envoy — a role he has used to broker conversations from Gaza to Moscow — Witkoff’s attendance at what is ostensibly a commercial real estate signing is not incidental. It suggests the Trump administration views the US-Pakistan economic partnership through a strategic lens: a Pakistan that is economically stable and commercially integrated with American markets is a Pakistan less susceptible to Chinese financial dependence.

This is not new calculus — successive US administrations have used economic diplomacy as a stabilization tool in South Asia. What is new is the vehicle: rather than aid packages or military agreements, the instrument here is a Manhattan skyscraper. It is, in its own way, a very 21st-century form of geopolitical leverage.

For Pakistan, the optics are equally valuable. A $5 billion JV with American institutional partners — potentially including US pension funds, REITs, or sovereign wealth co-investors — would represent the most visible demonstration yet that Islamabad’s reform programme is credible to Western capital markets.

Risks, Realities, and the Road Ahead

No analysis of this deal would be complete without acknowledging the considerable execution risks.

Pakistan’s track record on large infrastructure and real estate deals is uneven. Political transitions, currency volatility, and bureaucratic inertia have derailed ambitious projects before. The Roosevelt initiative has now survived multiple administrations in Islamabad — a promising sign — but the distance between an MoU and a construction permit in New York is vast.

The JV structure itself remains undefined. Who are Pakistan’s equity partners? What is the debt financing strategy in a rate environment that, even with Federal Reserve easing through late 2025, remains elevated relative to pre-pandemic norms? What happens to the historic hotel brand, if any? These are not minor details — they are the deal.

Community and preservationist opposition in New York is a near-certainty. The Roosevelt Hotel is a beloved landmark. Any proposal to dramatically alter its footprint will attract scrutiny from the Landmarks Preservation Commission, local councilmembers, and organized advocacy groups with significant legal resources.

And yet — the fundamentals are compelling. A prime Midtown site, sovereign Pakistani ownership with fresh political will, American federal facilitation, and a global moment when Pakistan real estate investment in New York represents a genuinely novel asset class story. For the right JV partner with patient capital and New York development expertise, this is the kind of opportunity that does not surface twice in a generation.

Conclusion: A Hotel as a Hypothesis

The Roosevelt Hotel redevelopment is, at its core, a hypothesis: that a country once synonymous with financial instability can execute a sophisticated, multi-billion-dollar cross-border real estate transaction in the world’s most competitive property market.

If it succeeds, it validates Pakistan’s privatization strategy, deepens US-Pakistan economic ties in a durable and visible way, and delivers a landmark development to Midtown Manhattan. If it falters — lost to political noise, financing gaps, or New York’s legendary bureaucratic friction — it will become a cautionary tale about the gap between diplomatic ambition and commercial execution.

Either way, on February 15, 2026, two signatories sat down at a table and bet on the future. The Roosevelt Hotel, after a century of witnessing history, may yet be its next chapter.


Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 The Economy, Inc . All rights reserved .

Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading