AI

Pakistan’s AI moment: Rs9bn prescription for a structural problem

Published

2 months ago

June 12, 2026

Inside the high-ceilinged committee rooms of Islamabad’s federal secretariat, the air conditioning hums against the mid-summer heat, masking a more volatile mathematical reality outside. The federal budget presented for the upcoming fiscal cycle contains an unexpected line item: a Rs9 billion ($32.4 million) capital allocation dedicated to state-backed artificial intelligence initiatives. For a nuclear-armed nation of 240 million people oscillating between industrial stagflation and acute balance-of-payments friction, this sudden technocratic enthusiasm feels remarkably bold. It represents a calculated gamble that algorithmic automation can somehow bypass decades of industrial stagnation, offering a digital escape hatch from an economy structurally defined by debt service and import dependency.

The state’s pivot toward high-tech intervention arrives at a moment of profound macroeconomic vulnerability. Pakistan remains bound to stringent fiscal stabilization metrics, managing an economy restricted by the terms of an IMF Extended Fund Facility program. According to the latest World Bank Pakistan Development Update, the country’s fiscal deficit and persistent revenue shortfalls leave virtually zero room for discretionary public spending.

Still, policymakers are increasingly viewing the technology sector not as a luxury, but as the only viable mechanism for rapid export-led recovery. The current monetary reality is grim: traditional industrial sectors like textiles are struggling under the weight of soaring energy costs and uncompetitive global supply chains. Consequently, the promise of low-overhead digital exports has turned into a policy anchor for an administration desperate to secure hard currency without triggering corresponding import surges.

SECTION 1 — The Core Development

The newly unveiled Pakistan AI policy framework attempts to transform this fiscal anxiety into a structured development roadmap. By concentrating Rs9 billion within a single fiscal year, the Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication plans to establish localized cloud compute infrastructure, fund public sector automation, and seed specialized academic research centers. Yet, when placed on the global ledger, this seemingly substantial domestic sum reveals the true scale of the challenge. The state’s entire capital injection roughly matches the cost of training a single modern large language model in Silicon Valley, illustrating a deep asymmetry between local ambition and global technological realities.

Global vs. Pakistani AI Resource Allocation (2026)
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Global Frontier Model Training Cost: ~$30-50M         │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Total Pakistan AI Policy Budget: ~$32.4M (Rs9bn)       │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

The operational plan details a multi-pronged approach designed to maximize the utility of these limited funds. Documents from the federal planning commission indicate that approximately Rs3.5 billion will fund a national compute cluster equipped with specialized graphics processing units. The state intends to lease this infrastructure to local startups at subsidized rates, reducing the foreign currency outflows currently flowing to commercial providers like Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure. The remaining capital is split between developing localized linguistic datasets and launching public sector automation pilots within the Federal Board of Revenue.

Reporting from Reuters on South Asian technology budgets confirms that regional competitors are moving at an entirely different order of magnitude. India’s state-backed AI assembly commands more than four times this fiscal intensity, while Gulf sovereign wealth funds are deploying tens of billions of dollars to build localized sovereign data centers.

The picture is more complicated when examining how these funds are distributed through bureaucratic channels. Historically, Pakistani public sector tech allocations face systemic deployment delays, with capital frequently trapped in administrative gridlock. If this Rs9 billion fund follows the traditional path of state-backed infrastructure projects, the hardware it aims to purchase risks obsolescence before the first servers are bolted into their racks.

SECTION 2 — Analytical Layer

Digital Transformation in Pakistan and the Compute Deficit

Deploying an advanced technology policy inside an economy with deep structural distortions creates immediate friction. Software does not exist in a vacuum; it requires reliable electrical currents, fiber-optic stability, and predictable regulatory environments. In Pakistan, where the industrial grid regularly suffers from multi-gigawatt generation deficits and distribution losses hover near 17%, building data-intensive compute infrastructure introduces a direct paradox. The state is attempting to construct an advanced digital economy on top of an analog power grid that struggles to maintain stable voltage across its main industrial zones.

Economic Variable	Baseline Reality	AI Policy Aspiration
Grid Stability	17% distribution loss, frequent blackouts	Continuous uptime for data centers
Capital Cost	20%+ domestic interest rates	Subsidized venture debt for startups
Talent Pool	High human capital flight to Gulf/EU	Domestic retention for state projects
Data Governance	Fragmented privacy laws	Sovereign cloud infrastructure

What emerges is an environment where capital costs severely restrict local innovation. With domestic interest rates remaining highly restrictive, technology startups cannot easily utilize local credit markets to fund growth. They must rely on foreign venture capital, which has contracted significantly following global monetary tightening cycles.

Can artificial intelligence fix Pakistan’s economic crisis?

Featured Snippet Target: Artificial intelligence cannot independently resolve Pakistan’s economic crisis because algorithms cannot fix fundamental structural distortions. While targeted automation can optimize tax collection and boost software exports, long-term economic stability requires deeper reforms to fix persistent fiscal deficits, energy grid instability, and systemic human capital flight.

The assumption that software deployment can substitute for basic structural reforms overlooks how modern technology ecosystems scale. AI models require clean, structured data inputs to optimize logistics, tax auditing, or agricultural yields. In Pakistan, the informal economy accounts for a massive share of total GDP, meaning the vast majority of economic transactions occur entirely outside the view of digital recording systems.

Without comprehensive formalization, advanced predictive models lack the base material needed to generate actionable intelligence. The problem isn’t a lack of machine learning models; it’s the absence of reliable data pipelines from an opaque, cash-reliant market.

SECTION 3 — Implications & Second-Order Effects

The downstream consequences of this policy shift will likely reshape the path of Pakistan IT sector growth over the coming decade. If the state successfully deploys subsidized compute infrastructure, it could lower the operational barrier to entry for early-stage software companies. This development would alter the composition of the local tech ecosystem, shifting it away from low-margin IT outsourcing and toward higher-value software-as-a-service products. This transition is essential for changing the country’s macroeconomic trajectory, as simple code-tendering rarely generates the intellectual property needed for sustainable wealth creation.

Still, this policy push must confront a major obstacle: intense human capital flight. Data gathered by the Financial Times on emerging market talent trends shows that Pakistan is losing its premier software engineers and data scientists at an accelerating rate.

Destination Choices for Migrating Pakistani Tech Talent
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)       ████████████ 45%  │
│ European Union                       ████████  30%     │
│ North America                        ████ 15%          │
│ Other Regions                        ██ 10%            │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Graduates from elite institutions like Lahore University of Management Sciences or the National University of Sciences and Technology often look for employment abroad within 24 months of graduation. They are pulled away by foreign currency stabilization and superior infrastructure in Europe or the Gulf. A Rs9 billion allocation for physical servers won’t yield much return if the engineers capable of building architectures on those servers are migrating to Dubai or Riyadh.

Tech Brain Drain Pipeline:
[Top Grads from LUMS/NUST] ──> [24 Months Local Experience] ──> [Currency Depreciation Push] ──> [Migration to Dubai/Riyadh]

This talent drain creates a secondary challenge for the broader artificial intelligence economic impact model. Local firms are forced to constantly replace senior engineering staff with junior developers, which caps the technical complexity of the software they can produce. Consequently, the local sector risks getting stuck in a cycle of basic web development and customer support automation, rather than moving up the value chain into advanced algorithmic design or autonomous systems. The state’s funding package addresses hardware shortages, but it leaves the human capital deficit largely untouched.

SECTION 4 — Competing Perspectives or Counterargument

Defenders of the federal initiative argue that focusing purely on these structural bottlenecks misses the strategic value of the policy. Senior officials within Pakistan’s National Information Technology Board contend that even a modest capital injection provides an essential signaling mechanism to international markets. In their view, formalizing a national strategy serves as a framework that encourages multilateral lenders and foreign venture funds to reconsider the country’s technology ecosystem. They point to localized agricultural technology pilots in the Punjab region, where basic machine learning models helped optimize water distribution across specific canal networks, increasing crop yields by 14% on participating farms.

Data from the International Monetary Fund’s country assessments suggests that targeted digital interventions can yield significant structural returns, particularly in revenue collection. Implementing automated anomalies detection within the country’s customs and tax structures could help capture billions in previously unrecorded economic activity.

Optimists argue that using AI to curb tax evasion doesn’t require a flawless national energy grid or complete digital literacy across the population. Instead, it requires a focused, well-funded analytical unit inside the central government. From this perspective, the Rs9 billion allocation shouldn’t be judged as a comprehensive economic cure, but rather as a highly targeted investment aimed at reforming the state’s fiscal mechanics.

The Closing

The central tension of Pakistan’s technology policy lies in the gap between modern software capabilities and fragile analog foundations. A Rs9 billion investment in artificial intelligence represents a genuine effort to update the nation’s economic model and drive growth in the tech sector. Yet, these digital initiatives cannot simply bypass the physical realities of energy shortages, capital constraints, and the steady loss of top engineering talent. True technological progress cannot be bought by simply purchasing high-performance microchips; it requires building the underlying human and civic infrastructure that allows those chips to function.

What follows, however, is a clear realization for policymakers: an economy cannot successfully code its way out of fundamental structural insolvency.

Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Up Next

Hong Kong Bank Accounts for Mainland Residents: Capital Flight Surge

Don't Miss

SpaceX IPO: Musk Raises $75bn in History’s Largest Listing

Click to comment

AI

Anthropic Offers Up to $600,000 Salary for Critical IPO Role as AI Giant Prepares for Wall Street Debut

Published

1 week ago

July 19, 2026

Abdul Rahman

As anticipation builds around what could become one of the largest technology listings in recent history, artificial intelligence company Anthropic is offering an eye-catching base salary of up to $600,000 for a key investor relations position, underscoring how seriously the company is preparing for its expected initial public offering (IPO).

The San Francisco-based AI developer, best known for its Claude family of AI models, has posted a vacancy for a Director of Investor Relations with a base compensation ranging from $425,000 to $600,000, making it one of the most strategically important hires ahead of its anticipated public market debut. According to a report by Business Insider, the company is expected to pursue an IPO as early as fall 2026, following a surge in valuation and extraordinary revenue growth.

A Strategic Hire Ahead of a Landmark IPO

The investor relations director will be responsible for shaping Anthropic’s investment narrative, maintaining relationships with institutional investors, and helping Wall Street understand the company’s long-term strategy and financial outlook.

According to the job description, the successful candidate will:

Develop Anthropic’s investment story for public markets.
Serve as a primary liaison between executive leadership and investors.
Analyze AI industry developments and communicate their financial implications.
Support earnings communications, investor presentations, and regulatory disclosures.
Work closely with the company’s newly appointed Head of Investor Relations.

The position reports into Kenneth Dorell, who joined Anthropic earlier this year after previously leading investor relations at Meta. His appointment reflects the company’s broader effort to build an experienced leadership team capable of navigating public market expectations.

Why Investor Relations Matters More Than Ever

While investor relations roles are common among public companies, they become especially significant during the transition from private to public ownership.

For Anthropic, the challenge extends beyond explaining quarterly financial results. The company must convince investors that its massive investments in AI research, computing infrastructure, and talent acquisition can translate into sustainable long-term growth.

Unlike many traditional software companies, Anthropic operates as a public benefit corporation, meaning it is legally committed to balancing shareholder returns with the responsible development of advanced artificial intelligence. The company’s official mission emphasizes building reliable, interpretable, and safe AI systems for the long-term benefit of society, according to the company’s website.

This dual mandate creates a unique communication challenge for investor relations executives, who must explain how commercial success aligns with responsible AI development.

AI Boom Drives Extraordinary Compensation

The offered salary highlights the increasingly fierce competition for executive talent across the AI industry.

Although a base salary of $600,000 is exceptional by conventional corporate standards, compensation at leading AI companies frequently includes stock awards, bonuses, and long-term incentives that can substantially increase total earnings.

Anthropic has become one of Silicon Valley’s fastest-growing companies, with demand for its enterprise AI products accelerating rapidly. The company’s coding assistant, Claude Code, has gained significant traction among software developers and businesses seeking AI-powered programming tools.

Recent reporting indicates that Anthropic’s annualized revenue has expanded dramatically as enterprise adoption of generative AI continues to accelerate, strengthening investor expectations ahead of a potential IPO.https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-ipo-hiring-investor-relations-director-2026-7

Preparing Wall Street for an Unconventional AI Company

Anthropic’s investor relations team faces a unique assignment.

Unlike mature technology companies with decades of operating history, frontier AI companies remain difficult to value because they invest billions of dollars annually in computing infrastructure, model training, and research talent while operating in a rapidly evolving competitive environment.

Potential investors will likely seek clarity on several key questions:

Future profitability.
Infrastructure spending.
AI safety governance.
Regulatory risks.
Competitive positioning against OpenAI, Google, Meta, and xAI.
Long-term monetization strategy.

The investor relations director will play a central role in translating these complex issues into a compelling investment thesis.

Strong Financial Momentum Strengthens IPO Expectations

Anthropic has emerged as one of the world’s most valuable privately held AI companies.

Backed by major investors including Amazon and Google, the company has attracted substantial funding over the past several years while rapidly expanding its enterprise customer base.

Its Claude models have become widely used for coding, research, enterprise automation, and business productivity, placing Anthropic among the strongest competitors to OpenAI.

The company’s remarkable financial momentum has fueled growing speculation that its IPO could become one of the defining public offerings of the AI era.

Competition for AI Talent Intensifies

The generous compensation package also reflects the broader battle for experienced executives across the artificial intelligence sector.

Companies developing frontier AI systems increasingly compete not only for elite researchers and engineers but also for specialists in finance, public markets, communications, and regulatory affairs.

As valuations continue climbing into the hundreds of billions of dollars, experienced executives capable of guiding companies through IPOs have become increasingly valuable.

Industry observers expect executive compensation across AI firms to remain elevated as competition intensifies.

The Bigger Picture

Anthropic’s decision to offer a base salary reaching $600,000 for an investor relations executive sends a clear signal that preparations for public markets are accelerating.

Beyond the headline salary, the recruitment reflects a broader transformation within the AI industry. As companies mature from venture-backed startups into global technology leaders, success increasingly depends not only on breakthrough research but also on convincing investors that enormous AI investments can produce sustainable long-term returns.

If Anthropic proceeds with its widely anticipated IPO, this investor relations hire could become one of the most influential behind-the-scenes roles in shaping how one of the world’s most valuable AI companies is introduced to public investors.

Sources

Business Insider, Anthropic is offering a $600,000 salary for one of its most important IPO hires: https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-ipo-hiring-investor-relations-director-2026-7
Anthropic, Official Company Website: https://www.anthropic.com/

Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

AI

Anthropic’s Trillion-Dollar Race: Inside the Path to an October 2026 IPO

Published

1 week ago

July 19, 2026

Abdul Rahman

Anthropic is preparing for a possible October 2026 IPO with Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan as lead underwriters, targeting a valuation close to or above $1 trillion — up from a $965 billion private valuation set in a May 2026 funding round. The listing would put Anthropic ahead of rival OpenAI, which has pushed its own IPO target from late 2026 into 2027.

Beyond the valuation headline

Most coverage of the Anthropic IPO has focused on a single number — the trillion-dollar valuation threshold. The more useful story for investors and market-watchers is the sequencing: why Anthropic is moving first, what its revenue trajectory actually looks like against that valuation, and what risks sit underneath the number that don’t show up in the headline.

Where things stand

Bankers working on Anthropic’s offering began scheduling meetings with prospective institutional investors in mid-July, according to reporting that cited people familiar with the process — a concrete signal that the company’s move toward a public listing, possible as early as October 2026, is advancing beyond speculation (CNBC via StartupHub; CNBC).

The valuation anchor is a $65 billion Series H funding round closed in May 2026, which pushed Anthropic’s post-money valuation to roughly $965 billion — surpassing OpenAI’s $852 billion valuation for the first time (CNBC; IG UK). Investment bankers and analysts widely expect the company to debut above the $1 trillion mark, assuming market conditions cooperate (IG UK).

Secondary-market pricing offers an early read on investor appetite: platforms tracking pre-IPO share transfers have shown an implied valuation range between roughly $1.05 trillion and $1.15 trillion, with one forecasting firm projecting a median first-day market capitalisation around $1.10 trillion — a 14% premium over the last private funding round (BitMEX).

The race against OpenAI

Timing is a deliberate part of the strategy. OpenAI also filed confidentially for an IPO but has since pushed its target from fall 2026 into 2027, giving Anthropic a window to list first (TheStreet). Being first matters for two structural reasons market analysts point to: the first mover sets the valuation benchmark the rest of the sector gets measured against, and it locks in institutional capital before broader AI-market sentiment has a chance to shift (TheStreet).

Prediction markets appear to be pricing that race directly: platform Kalshi has shown roughly a 72% probability of Anthropic listing before OpenAI, according to reporting (TheStreet).

The revenue math underneath the number

The valuation is aggressive relative to revenue by conventional software standards, though analysts describe it as within the range frontier AI companies have been commanding. Reported figures put Anthropic’s annualized revenue run-rate at roughly $47 billion as of May 2026, against the $965 billion private valuation — an implied multiple of around 20 times revenue (Luminix).

What stands out in the growth trajectory cited by analysts is its pace: the annualized run-rate reportedly moved from roughly $9 billion at the end of 2025 to $14 billion in February, $30 billion in April, and $47 billion by May — a rate of increase some analysts have described as effectively doubling every six weeks at points during that stretch (Luminix).

The consumer-versus-enterprise question

One structural risk analysts flag: Anthropic’s business is heavily weighted toward enterprise and API customers rather than consumer brand recognition. Estimates cited in investor analysis put ChatGPT’s share of consumer AI traffic at 53-68%, against roughly 2-6% for Claude (Luminix). That makes the IPO pitch to retail investors — who tend to reward consumer familiarity — different in kind from the enterprise-stickiness argument likely to anchor the institutional roadshow.

The SpaceX precedent looming over the deal

Anthropic’s timing follows closely behind SpaceX’s Nasdaq debut on June 12, 2026, which raised approximately $75 billion at a $1.77 trillion valuation under ticker SPCX. SpaceX shares have since fallen below their $135 IPO price — a data point IPO advisers and institutional buyers are reportedly weighing carefully as they assess how much premium markets will actually pay for a loss-making frontier technology company at IPO (StartupHub).

What’s confirmed versus speculative

It’s worth separating fact from forecast here. Confirmed: the confidential S-1 filing, the underwriter roster (Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan), the $965 billion May funding round, and the ongoing investor meetings. Not yet confirmed: the actual offering price range, the exact IPO date, and the final valuation — none of which will be public until the S-1 is unsealed, expected in the lead-up to any autumn listing.

Anthropic has also taken an unusual defensive step ahead of the listing, warning multiple secondary-market platforms — including Forge, Hiive and Sydecar — that unauthorised transfers of its private shares are void and will not be recognised on the company’s books, a signal of how closely it is trying to control pre-IPO trading and pricing signals ahead of an official debut (IG UK).

The bottom line

For the nine markets covered in this analysis, the Anthropic listing is less a Silicon Valley story than a global capital-markets event: a trillion-dollar-plus debut would be among the largest IPOs in history, competing directly with OpenAI for the same pool of institutional capital and setting the valuation benchmark every subsequent AI listing — in the US, Singapore, the UK or elsewhere — will be measured against.

Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Analysis

Southeast Asia’s Two-Speed Economy: AI Chips Boom While a Quieter Halal Corridor Expands

Published

1 week ago

July 19, 2026

Abdul Rahman

Singapore’s non-oil domestic exports rose 20.7% year-on-year in June 2026, driven by a 115.4% surge in integrated circuit shipments tied to AI demand, even as a separate and less-covered trade story unfolds next door: Malaysia-Indonesia bilateral trade is projected to grow 10% to US$29.3 billion in 2026, powered by expanding halal-sector cooperation.

The story most coverage is missing

Regional business press has extensively covered Singapore’s semiconductor export boom. What’s had far less coverage is the parallel, non-tech growth engine developing in the halal trade corridor between Malaysia and Indonesia — a structural, policy-driven trade relationship that is scaling steadily even as the AI trade headlines dominate attention.

Singapore: the AI supply chain’s export barometer

Singapore’s June non-oil domestic exports climbed 20.7% year-on-year, with integrated circuit exports jumping 115.4% and disk media products and personal computers rising 170.9% and 95.8% respectively — a direct read on how deeply the AI infrastructure buildout is flowing through the city-state’s electronics trade (VietnamPlus/VNA). Non-electronic exports told a different story, falling 2.9% in June after a 17.7% rise in May, mainly on weaker shipments of non-monetary gold, petrochemicals and food preparations — evidence the export strength is narrowly concentrated in the AI-linked segment rather than broad-based.

Singapore’s economic gravitational pull on its neighbours is intensifying too: a joint study by the Singapore Business Federation, Restaurant Association of Singapore and Singapore Retailers Association found Singaporean consumers are projected to spend an additional S$1.05 billion (roughly US$810 million) annually in Johor Bahru, just across the Malaysian border — a cross-border consumption pattern that is becoming a meaningful line item in regional retail planning (VietnamPlus/VNA).

The halal corridor: a steadier, policy-built growth story

While AI exports grab headlines, Malaysia’s bilateral trade with Indonesia is forecast to grow 10% to US$29.3 billion in 2026, according to Malaysia’s Chargé d’Affaires in Jakarta, Farzamie Sarkawi — up from US$26.61 billion in 2025, itself a 5.3% increase on the year before (BusinessToday Malaysia).

The driver is structural rather than cyclical: a halal Memorandum of Cooperation signed by the two countries in 2023 established mutual recognition of halal certification, easing product movement and market access across sectors. Sarkawi described the arrangement as delivering “positive progress” through knowledge exchange, training and improved market access for businesses in both countries (BusinessToday Malaysia). The ambition extends beyond the bilateral relationship: intra-D-8 trade — spanning the eight-nation Developing 8 bloc of Muslim-majority economies — currently runs between US$150 billion and US$160 billion annually, with a stated target of US$500 billion by 2030.

The macro backdrop: a region growing, unevenly

The Asian Development Bank’s July 2026 outlook shows Indonesia’s growth forecast holding steady at 5.2% for both 2026 and 2027, while Malaysia’s outlook is unchanged at 4.6% for 2026 and 4.5% for 2027 (ADB). Regional growth leadership, per McKinsey’s Q1 2026 review, sits with Indonesia, Singapore and Vietnam, while the Philippines lagged as domestic challenges weighed on activity (McKinsey).

Indonesia’s investment story has particular momentum: foreign direct investment grew for a second consecutive quarter, rising 8.1% to 249.9 trillion rupiah (roughly US$14.5 billion) in the first quarter of 2026, with Singapore remaining Indonesia’s largest single foreign investor at US$4.6 billion, ahead of China, Japan, Hong Kong and the United States (McKinsey). Realised investment for full-year 2025 reached a record Rp1,931.2 trillion (about US$120.7 billion), exceeding the government’s own target, driven by downstream industrial projects outside Java (BERNAMA).

Indonesia’s central bank has flagged currency management as an active watch item, signalling readiness to step up both onshore and offshore FX intervention to curb rupiah weakness and keep inflation within its 2026-2027 target band (McKinsey). Foreign investment in Indonesian government bonds has nonetheless rebounded, with net inflows of 17.7 trillion rupiah following outflows in the first quarter, alongside cumulative foreign holdings of 174 trillion rupiah in Bank Indonesia Rupiah Securities (BERNAMA).

Institutional context: Singapore’s coming ASEAN chairmanship

Adding a governance dimension to the economic picture, Singapore is set to take over the ASEAN chairmanship from the Philippines in 2027, with Prime Minister Lawrence Wong pledging a smooth transition — a leadership handover that will shape how the bloc coordinates trade and investment policy, including the halal-corridor and semiconductor-trade dynamics described above, through the second half of the decade (BERNAMA).

The bottom line

Southeast Asia’s 2026 growth story is not a single narrative but two distinct, converging tracks: a high-velocity, AI-linked export boom concentrated in Singapore’s electronics trade, and a steadier, policy-engineered halal-sector trade corridor between Malaysia and Indonesia that is quietly scaling toward a $500 billion bloc-wide target by 2030. Investors and policymakers tracking only the semiconductor headlines risk missing the second, structurally more durable growth engine sitting right alongside it.