Connect with us

Banks

The Rupture at HDFC Bank: How a Power Struggle Between Chairman and CEO Unraveled India’s Most Valued Franchise

Published

on

Atanu Chakraborty’s abrupt resignation as HDFC Bank Chairman exposes a deep power struggle with CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan. We analyze the leadership clash, governance fallout, and what it means for India’s banking giant.

In the rarefied world of Indian banking, HDFC Bank has long been the exception—a private-sector behemoth so meticulously governed and consistently profitable that it was often spoken of in the same reverent tones as JPMorgan Chase or HSBC in their prime. That aura of invincibility cracked on March 18, 2026, when Atanu Chakraborty, the bank’s non-executive chairman, submitted a resignation letter that sent a tremor through Dalal Street .

His parting words were as brief as they were devastating: “Certain happenings and practices within the bank, that I have observed over the last two years, are not in congruence with my personal values and ethics” . In a sector where stability is currency, such a cryptic public rupture between the chairman and the management is virtually unprecedented.

Over the following days, a more complex picture emerged—not of fraud or regulatory malfeasance, but of a deep-seated power struggle between Chakraborty and Managing Director & CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan. According to sources cited by the Financial Times, the clash involved divergent views on strategy, the future of key subsidiaries, and ultimately, the question of whether Jagdishan deserved a second term .

As the dust settles, investors, regulators, and corporate India are grappling with a singular question: Was this a necessary cleansing of governance norms, or a destructive personality conflict that has exposed the fragility of India’s most valuable banking franchise?

The Abrupt Exit: A Timeline of Turmoil

The timeline of events reveals a boardroom in disarray, struggling to contain reputational damage.

  • March 17, 2026: Atanu Chakraborty sends his resignation letter to H.K. Bhanwala, chairman of the Governance, Nomination and Remuneration Committee. Citing ethical misalignment, he steps down immediately .
  • March 18, 2026: The news breaks. HDFC Bank’s stock plunges as much as 8.7% in early trade—its steepest intra-day fall in over two years—erasing over ₹1 lakh crore in market capitalization at the peak of the panic .
  • March 19, 2026: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) moves swiftly to reassure the system, stating that HDFC Bank remains a “Domestic Systemically Important Bank (D-SIB)” with “no material concerns on record as regards its conduct or governance.” It approves Keki Mistry, a veteran of the HDFC group, as interim chairman .
  • March 23, 2026: The board, seeking to get ahead of the narrative, appoints domestic and international law firms to conduct a formal review of the contents of Chakraborty’s resignation letter .
  • March 26, 2026: The Financial Times reports that the resignation was the culmination of a long-running power struggle over strategy and Jagdishan’s reappointment. Global brokerage Jefferies removes HDFC Bank from its key portfolios, replacing it with HSBC, citing governance concerns .

Anatomy of a Rift: Strategy, Personality, and Power

While Keki Mistry, the interim chairman, publicly dismissed the idea of a “power struggle,” the details leaking from Mumbai’s financial circles suggest a relationship that had soured irreparably . The friction between Chakraborty, a career bureaucrat with a hands-on style, and Jagdishan, a low-profile insider who rose through the ranks, was apparent on multiple fronts.

The CEO Reappointment

The most immediate trigger appears to have been the renewal of Sashidhar Jagdishan’s tenure. According to sources quoted by the Financial Times, Chakraborty was not in favor of extending Jagdishan’s term, while a majority of the board supported the CEO’s continuation . A senior banking executive in Mumbai told FT that the chairman had “taken a clear stand against renewing Jagdishan’s term,” making the disagreement the primary catalyst for the fallout .

The HDB Financial Services Flashpoint

The tensions were not sudden. They had been building for years, crystallizing around the future of HDB Financial Services, the bank’s key non-banking subsidiary. In 2024, Jagdishan supported selling a minority stake to Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Chakraborty opposed the move. The deal collapsed, and the business was taken public instead . It was a clear defeat for the CEO’s strategic vision, orchestrated by the chairman—a dynamic that would have strained any working relationship.

Leadership Styles: The Bureaucrat vs. The Operator

Perhaps the most intractable difference was one of style. Chakraborty, a retired IAS officer and former Economic Affairs Secretary, is accustomed to wielding authority. Sources told CNBC-TV18 that the friction stemmed from Chakraborty’s functioning in an “executive style” despite holding a non-executive role . He reportedly involved himself in day-to-day decisions, including promotions and staff interactions, encroaching on territory that Jagdishan and his management team considered their own .

Jagdishan, in contrast, rose through the ranks of HDFC Bank over a quarter-century. He succeeded the legendary Aditya Puri, who led the bank for over 26 years. One shareholder noted that Jagdishan’s “understated” leadership style took time for senior executives to adjust to, lacking the imposing authority of his predecessor . The result was a boardroom where the chairman was perceived as overly assertive, and the CEO struggled to assert his operational control.

Governance at a Crossroads: India vs. Global Standards

The episode has reignited a crucial debate about governance norms in India’s banking sector. In the United States, a departure of this nature—involving ethical qualms from a director—would trigger a mandatory SEC filing (Form 8-K) detailing the nature of the disagreement. In the UK, the FCA expects immediate and precise market updates .

In India, the regulatory framework allowed for a degree of ambiguity that the market punished severely. Moneylife noted in its analysis that “confidence can evaporate faster than capital,” emphasizing that the RBI’s prompt reassurance was necessary to prevent a potential run on deposits in the age of UPI and instant transfers . The 2023 collapse of Silicon Valley Bank showed how quickly social media can accelerate a bank run; a similar dynamic could have unfolded for HDFC Bank had the central bank not intervened decisively .

The RBI’s quick approval of Keki Mistry and its public statement of support were designed to draw a line under the episode. However, the fact that the board had to hire external law firms to investigate the contents of a chairman’s resignation letter—a document the board presumably saw before it was made public—points to a breakdown in internal communication.

Market Reaction and Institutional Consequences

For institutional investors, governance risk is now a premium that must be priced into HDFC Bank’s valuation. The stock, which had already been under pressure due to post-merger integration challenges with HDFC Ltd, has declined about 14% in the past month .

The most telling blow came from Jefferies. The global brokerage exited its holdings in HDFC Bank, removing it from its Asia ex-Japan and global long-only equity portfolios, replacing it with HSBC . This decision, made without a specific explanation, signals that for some international investors, the reputational stain may take time to wash out.

Analysts are now split. Some, like JPMorgan’s Anuj Singla, warn that while no specific misconduct has been alleged, the “perception could weigh on investor sentiment and increase governance risk premium on the stock” . Others argue that the sell-off is overdone, noting that the bank’s fundamentals remain intact. As of late March, HDFC Bank was trading at approximately 1.7–1.8 times price-to-book, a discount to its historical averages but reflective of the broader macro headwinds and this specific governance hiccup .

Conclusion: A Test of Resilience

Atanu Chakraborty’s resignation is more than a boardroom drama; it is a stress test for HDFC Bank’s institutional resilience. The bank has survived—and thrived—through leadership transitions before. But the manner of this exit exposed the fragility of the relationship between the board and the executive suite.

Key AspectDetails
Primary IssuePower struggle between Chairman and CEO over strategy and reappointment .
Resignation DateMarch 17, 2026; announced March 18, 2026 .
Stock ReactionFell 8.7% intraday; down ~14% over the past month .
RBI ResponseApproved interim chairman; stated no material governance concerns .
Strategic Friction PointsDisagreement on HDB Financial Services sale and Jagdishan’s tenure .
Institutional ImpactJefferies removed HDFC Bank from key portfolios; SEBI reviewing the matter .

For Sashidhar Jagdishan, the path forward is now clearer—and lonelier. With Chakraborty’s departure, the board has effectively endorsed his leadership. Yet, the scrutiny from the RBI and SEBI, as well as the watchful eyes of global investors, will be intense. The bank has appointed external law firms to review the matter, a move that suggests a desire for transparency, but also one that opens the door to further disclosures .

In the end, the HDFC Bank episode serves as a reminder that in banking, trust is built over decades and can be shaken in minutes. Whether this moment becomes a footnote in the bank’s illustrious history or a turning point will depend on how quickly the institution can demonstrate that its governance is as robust as its balance sheet.


Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Banks

Citibank & Dólar Estadounidense: Forex Playbook After the Xi-Trump Truce

Published

on

With the September 24, 2026, US-China trade truce extended rather than permanently resolved, Citibank and institutional peers are pricing dólar estadounidense forecasts around a narrow, event-driven volatility window. For cross-border businesses and remittance senders, this compressed timeline shifts the focus from a clean directional currency bet to active hedging ahead of the new Q1 2027 deadline.

Why Citibank Is a Bellwether for Dólar Estadounidense Direction

Citibank’s global markets desk remains one of the most-cited authorities in dollar-peso forecasting due to its dual footprint: a deep US retail and corporate banking presence combined with one of the most extensive correspondent-banking networks across Latin America. When Citibank’s macroeconomic strategists adjust their USD/MXN forecasts, remittance companies, importers, and forex retail platforms typically follow suit within days. Therefore, tracking Citibank’s post-summit positioning offers a highly accurate proxy for where institutional capital expects the dollar to move next.

The September 24 Trade Truce Extension: What Changed

The September 24 Trump-Xi summit at the White House did not yield the durable macroeconomic trade agreement some forex analysts had priced in. Instead, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed a roughly two-month extension of the existing tariff pause, which had been originally set to lapse in November 2026. Analysts at preview briefings—including China specialists at CSIS—had already flagged rare-earth export controls and AI technology restrictions as the most difficult hurdles, which proved accurate.

For currency desks, an “extension-without-resolution” sends a specific technical signal: it eliminates the tail risk of an immediate, severe trade-war escalation, but maintains the uncertainty premium that emerging market currencies have priced in since the spring. This explains the sharp, localized spike in the USD/MXN pair following the September 24 announcement, as traders unwound overly optimistic positions and re-priced for continued negotiations.

Dólar Estadounidense: Current Post-Summit Positioning

Data updated as of late September 2026.

MetricCurrent Reading / ForecastMarket Context
USD/MXN Spot Rate~17.65–17.70 pesos per dollarSpiked from 16.95 in mid-September following the Sept 24 summit.
USD 12-Month Change vs. PesoDollar down ~2% year-over-yearLate September volatility has narrowed the dollar’s YOY deficit.
Citi Analyst Survey (Year-End 2026)~17.50 pesos per dollarIndicates expectations of slight stabilization.
Monex House Forecast (2026)~17.80 pesos per dollarPricing a higher geopolitical risk premium into Q4.

Sources: Banxico FIX rate reporting; Citi Encuesta de Expectativas survey of 37 institutions; Monex economic research.

Why the Peso Remained Historically Strong in 2026

Despite the immediate post-summit dollar spike, the peso mexicano has maintained a broader resilience through much of 2026. Three macroeconomic forces explain this dynamic:

  1. Persistent Carry-Trade Demand: Even with central bank adjustments, Mexico’s benchmark interest rate remains significantly higher than the US Federal Reserve’s rate. This spread keeps peso-denominated sovereign debt highly attractive to yield-seeking capital.
  2. Resilient Remittance and Nearshoring Flows: Despite US-China trade friction, North American supply chain integration (nearshoring) and the US-Mexico goods trade have remained robust, ensuring structural dollar inflows into Mexico.
  3. A Weaker Broad Dollar Trend: Tied to the broader Fed easing cycle, the dollar has occasionally softened against a basket of global currencies, limiting its ability to achieve runaway momentum against the peso.

Citibank’s Forex Playbook for the Rest of 2026

Institutional desks like Citibank are advising corporate clients to treat the current Q4 window as a critical hedging opportunity rather than a speculative directional bet. With the new truce deadline landing in the opening weeks of Q1 2027, volatility will likely cluster around that date regardless of the ultimate macroeconomic outcome.

Practical takeaways for cross-border exposure:

  • Lock in Forward Contracts: Secure forex pricing before the Q1 2027 truce deadline if your business has scheduled cross-border payments in that window.
  • Monitor the 10-Year Treasury Yield: Yields have acted as a more responsive, real-time indicator of trade-risk pricing this year than delayed central bank statements.
  • Track the Remittance Corridor: Treat US-Mexico remittance-corridor pricing as directional context; it is one of the most liquid, closely watched proxies for broader dollar sentiment.

Q4 2026 to Q1 2027 Predictive Scenarios

ScenarioAnticipated USD/MXN PathMarket Probability
Base Case: Truce holds into Q1 2027, talks continuePeso stabilizes near the 17.40–17.70 rangeHighest
Tail Risk: Truce collapses before the new deadlineDollar spikes toward 18.50+ on safe-haven risk-off flowsModerate
Bullish Surprise: Durable US-China deal reachedPeso strengthens back toward 16.50–16.90Low (Near-term)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the dólar estadounidense worth in pesos today?

Following the late-September 2026 summit volatility, the dollar is trading in the 17.65–17.70 peso range, up from sub-17.00 levels earlier in the month. Because forex markets fluctuate continuously, always confirm against Banxico’s FIX rate or a live institutional feed before executing a transfer.

Why does a US-China summit affect the Mexican peso?

While Mexico is not a direct party to the Xi-Trump negotiations, US-China trade tension directly impacts the broad US dollar index and global risk appetite. These macroeconomic shifts immediately spill over into every dollar-paired emerging market currency, including the highly liquid Mexican peso.

Is now a good time to send money via the US-Mexico remittance corridor?

For dollar earners sending money to Mexico, the late-September bump to ~17.67 pesos per dollar offers slightly better purchasing power than the mid-September lows. However, timing depends heavily on individual cash-flow needs rather than attempts to perfectly time geopolitical news cycles.


Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Mortgage

How the Trump-Xi White House Summit Is Reshaping Mortgage Rates Today for Real Estate Investors

Published

on

The September 24 Trump-Xi summit produced a two-month trade-truce extension rather than a durable deal — and that ambiguity, not a headline breakthrough, is what’s now keeping the 10-year Treasury yield elevated and mortgage rates parked near 7% heading into the fourth quarter.

Mortgage Rates Today: The Q4 2026 Baseline

Freddie Mac’s benchmark survey put the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at 6.95% for the week of September 17, 2026 — the fourth consecutive weekly increase and the highest reading since January 2025. The 15-year fixed climbed in tandem to 6.26%. A year earlier, the 30-year average sat more than half a point lower, near 6.26%.

Loan TypeRate (week of Sept. 17, 2026)Rate (1 year prior)
30-year fixed6.95%6.26%
15-year fixed6.26%5.41%
5/1 ARM~6.8%–7.0%—
30-year VA~6.2%–6.3%—

Source: Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey; Zillow daily rate tracker.

The proximate driver is the bond market, not the housing market. Mortgage pricing tracks the 10-year Treasury yield, and that yield has been climbing toward the high-4% range through September on a combination of heavy government issuance and a Federal Reserve that has signaled it is in no hurry to cut. Layer geopolitical risk on top — oil above $90 a barrel amid Middle East disruption, plus unresolved US-China friction — and lenders are pricing in a wider risk premium.

Why the Summit Matters to Your Rate Lock

Real estate investors tend to treat foreign policy as background noise. That’s a mistake in Q4 2026. The Trump-Xi relationship is now the single largest swing factor in how bond markets price forward risk, because it touches three things that feed directly into Treasury yields: tariff policy, rare-earth and technology export controls, and the credibility of the disinflation narrative the Fed needs to justify future rate cuts.

What Actually Happened at the September 24 Summit

Xi Jinping’s September 24 visit to the White House was the second Trump-Xi meeting of 2026, following a May 14–15 state visit to Beijing where the two sides agreed to pursue what they termed a “constructive, strategically stable relationship.” The Washington leg was shorter on ceremony and shorter on breakthroughs. According to Reuters’ pool reporting, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed the two sides extended their trade truce — originally due to lapse in November — by roughly two months, buying time rather than locking in a structural agreement.

That is the detail markets are trading on. An extension without resolution leaves tariff rates, Chinese purchasing commitments, rare-earth export licenses, and technology restrictions all still in play heading into the new year. For bond investors, unresolved trade risk is inflationary risk: tariffs raise input costs, and rare-earth bottlenecks squeeze manufacturers that feed into consumer prices. Both push against the case for near-term Fed easing, and Fed policy is the single biggest lever on where mortgage rates land.

Three Summit Threads With Direct Rate Impact

  1. The 60-day trade truce clock. With the new deadline now sometime in early 2026’s first quarter, expect renewed rate volatility as that date approaches — mortgage desks should treat any lock decision inside that window as elevated-risk.
  2. AI and export-control friction. Both sides used the September summit to air disagreements over AI development and chip/technology export controls, an area CSIS analysts have flagged as the least-resolved dimension of the relationship. Unresolved tech friction keeps a geopolitical risk premium baked into yields.
  3. No durable tariff resolution. Core tariff and purchasing questions were pushed into the next round of talks, meaning the inflation uncertainty that has kept the Fed cautious remains unresolved.

Featured Snippet: What Is the Average Mortgage Rate Today?

As of mid-to-late September 2026, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate in the US is running just under 7%, per Freddie Mac’s weekly survey — the highest level since January 2025, driven by rising Treasury yields tied to heavy government borrowing and unresolved US-China trade risk following the September 24 Trump-Xi summit.

Asian Growth and the Global Rate Picture

The mortgage story doesn’t stop at the US border. The Asian Development Bank’s September 2026 outlook nudged developing Asia’s 2026 growth forecast up slightly to 5.0%, even as regional inflation stays elevated near 4.2%. Stronger Asian growth alongside sticky inflation is broadly consistent with the “higher for longer” global rate environment that’s keeping US mortgage rates elevated — it’s not just a domestic story.

Q4 2026 Predictive Outlook

  • Base case: 30-year fixed rates hold in the 6.7%–7.1% band through year-end, with volatility clustering around the new US-China truce deadline and the next two Fed meetings.
  • Upside risk (higher rates): A breakdown in the truce, renewed tariff escalation, or a hawkish surprise from the Fed pushes the 30-year toward 7.25%–7.5%.
  • Downside risk (lower rates): A durable trade framework or a faster-than-expected inflation cooldown could pull rates back toward the low 6% range, though nothing in current Fed communication points to that in Q4.

FAQ

Will mortgage rates go down before the end of 2026?

Most forecasters, including those tracked by Freddie Mac and major bank research desks, see rates holding near current levels through Q4 2026 absent a clear resolution to US-China trade tensions or a faster Fed pivot.

How does the Xi-Trump summit affect US mortgage rates?

It affects rates indirectly, through Treasury yields. Unresolved trade and tech-export issues keep an inflation and geopolitical-risk premium in bond markets, which raises the yields that mortgage-backed securities are priced against.

What is a good mortgage rate right now?

Relative to the current national average near 6.9%–7.0%, well-qualified borrowers securing rates half a point or more below the weekly Freddie Mac average are getting a comparatively strong deal in today’s market.


Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Bank Account

Huntington Online Banking: Full Features, Fees, and How It Compares in 2026

Published

on

Huntington online banking app displayed on a smartphone beside a Huntington bank card, with a modern bank branch and financial comparison graphic in the background.

Most banks charge an overdraft fee the moment your balance dips below zero — Huntington built its entire consumer banking reputation on refusing to do that, and its 24-Hour Grace program remains one of the most distinctive features in U.S. retail banking more than a decade after launch.

Huntington National Bank, headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, operates one of the more feature-rich online and mobile banking platforms among regional U.S. banks, built around a “fair play” philosophy that predates the broader industry’s more recent overdraft-fee reforms. For anyone comparing online banking platforms, understanding exactly what Huntington offers — and where it falls short — matters more than generic marketing claims.

This guide breaks down Huntington’s online banking features, fee structure, and how it stacks up against typical regional and online-only bank alternatives.

How Huntington’s Online Banking Platform Works

Huntington’s digital banking centers on a small number of genuinely differentiated features rather than an exhaustive features list, with its overdraft-relief program as the clear centerpiece.

Key takeaway: Huntington was the first major U.S. bank to introduce a next-business-day overdraft grace period back in 2010, in direct response to shifting consumer attitudes following the 2008 financial crisis — a policy still in place today as “24-Hour Grace.”

Core Online and Mobile Banking Features

Step-by-Step: Setting Up Huntington Online Banking

  1. Open a Huntington checking or savings account, either online or in-branch, with identity verification and an opening deposit.
  2. Enroll in online banking through Huntington’s website or mobile app using your new account credentials.
  3. Set up account alerts for low balances to proactively manage overdraft risk, even with 24-Hour Grace as a backstop.
  4. Link external accounts, if desired, for transfers or a consolidated view of your full financial picture.
  5. Download the mobile app for check deposit, bill pay, and on-the-go account management.
  6. Enroll in overdraft transfer protection, if you hold a linked savings or money market account, for an additional layer of fee avoidance.

Financial and Strategic Implications: Huntington’s Fee Structure

Understanding the actual fee schedule — not just the marketing highlights — is essential before choosing any bank, including one with a strong overdraft-relief reputation.

Fee TypeHuntington’s RateContext
Overdraft fee$15Waived under 24-Hour Grace if cured by next business day
Nonsufficient funds feeNoneNotably more favorable than many competitors that still charge NSF fees
Monthly maintenance fee$0–$25 depending on account tierOften waivable via direct deposit or minimum balance
Out-of-network ATM fee$3.50Comparable to industry norms; in-network access matters for frequent ATM users
Excessive transaction feeNoneFavorable compared to banks that still cap monthly transactions on savings accounts

Expert insight: Huntington’s savings account APYs are generally on the lower end relative to dedicated online-only high-yield savings accounts, meaning customers primarily focused on maximizing savings yield may still want to pair a Huntington checking account with a separate high-yield savings account elsewhere, rather than consolidating everything at one institution.

Business Banking Features Mirror the Consumer Overdraft Philosophy

24-Hour Grace is also available free on Huntington’s business Checking, Savings, and Money Market accounts, extending the same next-business-day cure window to small business customers — a feature not universally matched by competing regional business banking platforms.

Branch and ATM Network Considerations

Huntington operates roughly 1,000 branches across 10 states, concentrated primarily in the Midwest and parts of the Southeast. Customers outside this footprint who want in-network branch or ATM access should weigh this limitation carefully against Huntington’s digital feature set.

How to Decide If Huntington Online Banking Is Right for You

  • Heavy overdraft-risk customers benefit disproportionately from 24-Hour Grace, making Huntington a stronger fit for those who occasionally run tight on cash flow than for savers optimizing purely for yield.
  • Compare savings APY separately from checking features — Huntington’s checking-account overdraft protections are strong, but its savings yields are not typically competitive with dedicated online-only high-yield accounts.
  • Confirm you live or frequently travel within Huntington’s branch footprint if in-person banking access matters to you.
  • Check current monthly fee waiver requirements for your specific account tier, since these can change and vary by account type.
  • Consider a hybrid approach — many customers use Huntington (or a similar regional bank) for everyday checking and its overdraft protections, while keeping savings at a separate high-yield online bank.
Key takeaway: Huntington’s core value proposition isn’t the highest interest rates in the market — it’s meaningfully reduced overdraft and fee risk for everyday checking, which matters most to customers who periodically run close to a zero balance rather than those optimizing purely for savings yield.

Future Outlook: Huntington and Regional Bank Digital Trends Through 2027

  • Overdraft-fee reform has become an industry-wide trend, not just a Huntington differentiator. Since Huntington pioneered 24-Hour Grace, broader regulatory and competitive pressure has pushed many banks to reduce or eliminate overdraft fees, meaning Huntington’s original advantage has partly narrowed relative to the rest of the industry — even as it remains a genuinely strong feature.
  • Regional banks continue investing in mobile-first features to compete with fintech challengers. Expect continued expansion of in-app financial management tools, alerts, and budgeting features across Huntington and similar regional banks.
  • Business banking digital features are expanding alongside consumer features. Huntington’s extension of 24-Hour Grace to business accounts reflects a broader trend of regional banks matching consumer-grade digital experience for small business customers.
  • Branch footprint remains a differentiator versus online-only banks. As some consumers continue to value in-person access for certain transactions, Huntington’s roughly 1,000-branch network remains a relevant advantage over purely digital competitors, within its regional footprint.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Huntington’s 24-Hour Grace program?

It’s a free, automatic feature that waives overdraft and return fees if you bring your account balance positive by midnight Central Time the next business day, with no enrollment required.

Does Huntington charge a nonsufficient funds (NSF) fee?

No. Huntington does not charge a separate NSF fee, which is more favorable than many competing banks that still charge this fee in addition to overdraft fees.

Is Huntington good for savings accounts specifically?

Not particularly, relative to dedicated online-only high-yield savings accounts. Huntington’s savings APYs tend to run lower than top online banks, making it a stronger fit for everyday checking than for maximizing savings yield.

How many branches does Huntington have?

Huntington operates approximately 1,000 branches across 10 states, concentrated primarily in the Midwest.

Does Huntington offer 24-Hour Grace for business accounts too?

Yes. The feature is available free on Huntington business Checking, Savings, and Money Market accounts, in addition to consumer accounts.


Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2026 The Economy, Inc . All rights reserved .

Discover more from The Economy

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading