Analysis
2026 US Government Shutdown: Trump’s Funding Deal Awaits House Vote Amid Limited Disruptions
The United States government entered a partial shutdown early Saturday morning as Congress awaits House approval of a Trump-brokered funding deal—the second shutdown since the president returned to office in 2025. Unlike the devastating 43-day crisis last fall, this funding lapse appears headed for swift resolution, affecting a more limited scope of federal operations.
The Senate approved a bipartisan spending package 71-29 late Friday, but with the House in recess until Monday, six major departments entered technical shutdown at 12:01 a.m. Eastern time Saturday. Most Americans won’t notice immediate impacts, as essential workers continue operations and critical services remain funded.
Minneapolis Tragedy Sparks Shutdown Crisis
This wasn’t your typical budget battle. The shutdown emerged from national outrage over federal immigration enforcement tactics—specifically, the fatal shootings of two American citizens by federal agents in Minneapolis within three weeks.
Border Patrol agents killed Alex Jeffrey Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse at Minneapolis VA Medical Center, on January 24 while he filmed officers with his phone and helped a pushed protester. Seventeen days earlier, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer Jonathan Ross had fatally shot Renée Good, also 37, igniting widespread protests.
Bystander videos contradicted the administration’s claim that Pretti “brandished” a weapon. Forensic analysis showed 10 shots fired in under five seconds after agents pepper-sprayed and wrestled Pretti down—with video evidence revealing an agent removed Pretti’s legally holstered firearm before the shooting.
The killings sparked Democratic demands for accountability. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer declared Democrats wouldn’t fund the Department of Homeland Security without immigration enforcement reforms including body cameras, warrant requirements, and investigative oversight.
Trump’s Bipartisan Compromise
Facing bipartisan criticism—even Republican Senators Ted Cruz and John Curtis condemned Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s premature “domestic terrorist” label for Pretti—Trump negotiated directly with Schumer, crafting an unusual compromise.
The deal separated DHS funding from five other spending bills, providing a two-week Homeland Security extension while fully funding Defense, Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, State, and Financial Services through September 30, 2026’s fiscal year end.
“I don’t want a shutdown,” Trump posted on Truth Social, urging a bipartisan “YES” vote. His support proved crucial for Senate passage, with only five Republicans opposing: Senators Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Ron Johnson, and Rick Scott.
Senator Lindsey Graham lifted his procedural hold Friday after securing future votes on sanctuary city legislation.
Limited Scope: What’s Affected vs. Protected
This partial government shutdown differs dramatically from October’s 43-day crisis. Six of twelve annual appropriations bills were already signed, protecting substantial federal operations.
Affected agencies: Defense (essential military continues), Homeland Security (immigration enforcement separately funded), Health and Human Services, Labor, Transportation, Treasury/IRS, Education, Housing and Urban Development, State (embassies open), federal courts, SEC.
Fully funded through September: Agriculture (no SNAP interruption), Veterans Affairs, National Parks, Justice Department, Commerce, Energy, EPA, NASA.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates this targeted approach dramatically reduces economic fallout versus last year’s shutdown.
Economic Impact: Minimal If Brief
A weekend shutdown will barely register economically if the House acts Monday. CBO analysis shows each shutdown week reduces annualized GDP growth by roughly 0.25 percentage points in the affected quarter—negligible over two days when federal offices are already closed.
Context matters: last fall’s 43-day shutdown slashed fourth-quarter 2025 GDP growth by 1.5 percentage points, costing $11-14 billion in permanently lost economic output. Goldman Sachs estimated that crisis reduced Q4 growth by 1.15 percentage points, with a compensating 1.3-point Q1 2026 boost as delayed federal spending shifted forward.
This time’s different. Essential workers—military, air traffic control, TSA, Border Patrol—continue operations. Crucially, 42 million Americans receiving SNAP food assistance face no interruption, unlike devastating gaps during fall’s Agriculture Department funding lapse.
“The macroeconomic impact of a shutdown is limited in the near term,” Fitch Ratings noted, though warning “protracted disruption” could “slightly slow U.S. economic growth.”
Historical Context: Second Shutdown in Three Months
The October-November 2025 shutdown lasted 43 days—America’s longest—inflicting widespread disruption on 1.4 million federal employees furloughed or working without pay. Tourism Economics estimated $63 million daily travel industry losses. SNAP benefits were delayed for millions.
That crisis resolved when both parties acknowledged mounting costs. Congress then funded half the government through September 2026. The remaining six bills—now caught in the DHS controversy—were extended through January 30.
This impasse represents unfinished business, but with different dynamics. Rather than spending disputes, this stems from trust breakdown in federal law enforcement following DHS’s “Operation Metro Surge”—the “largest immigration enforcement operation ever” in Minneapolis, producing 3,000+ arrests since December but also the Good and Pretti killings plus 11 other federal immigration officer shootings since September, per NBC News.
Monday’s Crucial House Vote
Speaker Mike Johnson expects Monday evening passage, but obstacles remain. The House Freedom Caucus opposes separating DHS funding. Johnson’s razor-thin majority means Republican defections could doom the bill without Democratic support.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries complicated matters Saturday, announcing Democrats won’t expedite passage. “Any change in the homeland bill needs to be meaningful and transformative,” Jeffries warned. “Absent dramatic change, Republicans will get another shutdown.”
The bill must clear the Rules Committee first, where Republican defections could block floor consideration. Johnson needs a coalition spanning his party’s spectrum while potentially securing Democratic votes—a delicate balance.
The real battle starts in two weeks: negotiating DHS funding through September. Democrats demand body cameras, warrants, agent unmasking, and local investigative authority. Republicans counter such restrictions would handcuff law enforcement and undermine Trump’s priorities.
“Senate Democrats will not support an extension unless it reins in ICE and ends violence,” Schumer warned. Majority Leader John Thune acknowledged “snags on both sides” but expressed cautious optimism about negotiations.
Accountability Questions and Political Fallout
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz accused federal officials of deploying “untrained” agents and cover-ups, citing “closing the crime scene, sweeping away evidence, defying court orders.” He called it “an inflection point in America.”
A preliminary internal CBP review contradicted administration claims Pretti attacked officers. The assessment described pepper-spraying and struggle but no weapon brandishing—starkly different from Noem’s “domestic terrorism” characterization.
Eight policing experts told The Washington Post the Border Patrol’s tactics likely violated modern de-escalation protocols. Former acting DHS undersecretary John Cohen said videos show Pretti “did not walk up to anybody from CBP in a threatening manner.”
Fallout was swift: Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino lost his command. Two shooters were placed on administrative leave. The Justice Department opened formal investigation. Trump sent border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota, though early meetings with Walz produced only vague “ongoing dialogue” commitments.
Looking Forward: Fragile Governance
This weekend’s shutdown may prove brief and painless versus October’s crisis. But underlying causes—law enforcement trust breakdown, appropriations weaponization, polarization hampering routine governance—signal deeper systemic challenges.
Two citizens dead. Thousands anxious about immigration enforcement. Federal workers face paycheck uncertainty again. Congress confronts a two-week deadline on issues intractable for months.
Friday’s bipartisan 71-29 Senate vote offers hope functional governance survives when leaders choose compromise. Trump’s Schumer negotiation shows political pragmatism can override partisan impulses when stakes are high.
But Monday’s House vote tests whether bipartisan spirit survives that chamber’s fractious dynamics. The two-week DHS extension merely delays reckoning over balancing immigration enforcement with constitutional protections and community trust.
Every impasse day delays contracts, stalls procurement, forces hundreds of thousands unpaid. Federal contractors—potentially 5.2 million per Oxford Economics—face particular uncertainty, historically receiving no back pay.
CBO projects 2.2% 2026 GDP growth, partly from rebound effects as delayed federal spending flows forward. But projections assume no additional extended shutdowns—an increasingly tenuous assumption given two shutdowns in three months.
For now, Americans wait—again—for government to keep lights on. The shutdown may be partial and short, but it underscores governance machinery’s fragility. The Senate showed bipartisanship remains possible; the question is whether it can endure beyond crisis moments to become the norm rather than exception.
Discover more from The Economy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Opinion
The Sandbox Imperium: Why Beijing’s Digital Yuan Needs Hong Kong
For decades, the global dominance of the U.S. dollar has rested on two primary pillars: deep, unencumbered liquid capital markets and an indispensable global financial messaging protocol known as SWIFT. When Beijing launched its e-CNY initiative, Western observers initially framed it as a central bank digital currency (CBDC) designed primarily for domestic surveillance, retail convenience, and financial inclusion.
However, recent strategic moves highlight a far more ambitious objective. As documented by the South China Morning Post, Beijing is actively leveraging Hong Kong as its central offshore laboratory to establish the infrastructure required for international cross-border digital yuan adoption.
The crucial strategic question is no longer whether China can engineer robust distributed ledger architecture, but whether an offshore financial hub operating under “One Country, Two Systems” can bridge the gap between rigid domestic capital controls and global institutional acceptance. To succeed, China must resolve the fundamental tension between absolute monetary sovereignty and the open networks required for international currency adoption.
1. The Paradox of the Offshore Laboratory
China’s monetary expansion faces a well-documented structural paradox. According to macroeconomic research from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, no currency can achieve true international reserve status without offering open capital accounts and deep, freely convertible liquidity. Yet, completely relaxing capital controls would expose China’s domestic banking system to volatile international capital flows and speculative pressures.
Hong Kong serves as the pressure valve and testing ground for this paradox:
- Legal & Regulatory Buffer: Hong Kong maintains a trusted common law judicial system and an independent monetary authority (Hong Kong Monetary Authority).
- Convertibility Bridge: It allows mainland authorities to test e-CNY settlement, cross-border retail links, and digital asset integration without opening mainland financial markets directly to global speculative shocks.
- Institutional Liquidity: As the world’s premier offshore renminbi hub, Hong Kong provides the institutional counterparties necessary to build real-world transaction volume.
“The digital yuan’s true test lies not in domestic retail adoption, but in whether foreign counterparties can settle cross-border trade without taking on unacceptable regulatory or capital risks.”
2. Wholesale Settlement and Project mBridge
While retail consumer wallets attract considerable media attention, the real geopolitical shift is occurring at the wholesale institutional level. Strategic initiatives like Project mBridge—developed in partnership with the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the People’s Bank of China, and regional central banks—demonstrate how multi-CBDC platforms can streamline international trade.
As reported in market analyses by Bloomberg and trade finance studies covered by Reuters, multi-lateral CBDC platforms offer significant operational advantages:
- Elimination of Intermediaries: Direct ledger-to-ledger transactions bypass traditional correspondent banking networks.
- Speed and Efficiency: Cross-border settlement times are reduced from days to seconds.
- Cost Reduction: Transaction costs and foreign exchange spreads across regional trade corridors in Asia and the Middle East are dramatically lowered.
If commercial enterprises operating in Hong Kong can settle trade directly in e-CNY with instant finality, Beijing creates a compelling economic incentive for trade partners that operates independently of Western clearing networks.
3. Geopolitical Implications & The Road Ahead
Western policymakers and central bankers are monitoring these developments closely. Recent congressional testimony and Treasury reviews highlighted by Reuters reflect growing concern in Washington that alternative settlement rails could gradually erode the reach and enforcement of Western financial sanctions.
However, technological capability alone does not guarantee global currency dominance. Until foreign corporate treasuries and central banks have full confidence in converted currency liquidity, property rights, and transparent legal protections, the digital yuan will serve primarily as an efficient alternative mechanism for bilateral trade rather than an immediate replacement for the U.S. dollar.
Institutional Summary & Comparison
| Dimension | Conventional Retail Focus | Wholesale / Strategic Reality |
| Primary Mechanism | Retail e-CNY wallets for tourists & merchants | Multi-CBDC corridors (Project mBridge) & Project Ensemble |
| Core Objective | Domestic payments & payment app competition | Disintermediation of correspondent banking and SWIFT rails |
| Primary Barrier | Consumer habituation & merchant readiness | Capital controls, currency convertibility, and institutional trust |
Sources & Citations
- South China Morning Post: Beijing wants Hong Kong to sow the seeds for the digital yuan
- Bank for International Settlements (BIS): Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) & Cross-Border Payments Research
- Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: China’s Financial System and Capital Account Dynamics
- Bloomberg Financial Analysis: Global Macro & Digital Currency Integration
- Reuters News & Analysis: Cross-Border Settlement and Global Trade Finance
Discover more from The Economy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Analysis
Tokyo Disneyland Peter Pan’s Flight Closure: January–February 2027 Guide
Guests planning a visit to Tokyo Disneyland in early 2027 should put one easily missed detail on their itinerary: Peter Pan’s Flight is scheduled to be temporarily closed from January 6 through February 2, 2027. The operator lists the dates both on its official attraction page and in the Tokyo Disneyland closure schedule. This is a scheduled interruption, not an announcement that the classic ride is being removed permanently. Travelers visiting on dates inside that window should assume the attraction will not be available unless Tokyo Disney Resort publishes a change.
The distinction matters because online references to “Peter Pan closing at Tokyo Disney” can confuse two different parks and two different experiences. Tokyo Disneyland’s Peter Pan’s Flight is a compact Fantasyland ride. Tokyo DisneySea has a separate, newer attraction called Peter Pan’s Never Land Adventure, with its own planned March 2027 maintenance period. The first planning step is making sure the information applies to the ticket you actually bought.
At a glance: what the operator currently says
| Planning question | Verified answer |
|---|---|
| Which attraction? | Peter Pan’s Flight |
| Which park? | Tokyo Disneyland, Fantasyland |
| Scheduled closure starts | January 6, 2027 |
| Scheduled closure ends | February 2, 2027 |
| Reopening expectation | After the listed closure window, subject to operator changes |
| Type of notice | Temporary closure; not announced as permanent |
| Where to recheck | Official attraction listing |
The dates are explicitly labeled as a temporary closure by Tokyo Disney Resort. Do not treat February 3 as an unconditional reopening guarantee: an operator may update maintenance information or temporarily suspend operations for other reasons. Check again shortly before travel and on the day you enter the park.
What is Peter Pan’s Flight?
Peter Pan’s Flight is a dark ride based on the familiar journey from London to Never Land. Guests sit in a flying pirate-ship vehicle that travels through a storybook environment. According to the operator’s ride information, it is in Fantasyland, lasts about two and a half minutes and carries two people per vehicle. It operates indoors and includes dark spaces. These details make it particularly appealing to families who want a gentle, classic Disney experience rather than a high-speed thrill ride.
There are restrictions worth noting even on operating days. The published guidance says a guest must be able to maintain a stable seated position independently and that children may not be held on an adult’s lap during the ride. If your group includes young children, anyone needing seating assistance or visitors uncomfortable with darkness, read the official description and accessibility guidance rather than assuming that the attraction suits everyone because it is short.
Short ride duration is not the same as short waiting time. Demand for well-known classics can vary with crowds, operating conditions and holiday schedules, so it is unwise to schedule a tight sequence of unrelated bookings around a predicted queue. The operator’s app and in-park staff can provide current operating information when the ride is available.
The dates around the closure are not interchangeable
A guest visiting January 5 has a fundamentally different planning position from someone arriving January 6. January 5 falls before the currently listed closure, while January 6 is its opening day. A February 2 visit falls on the final listed day of the maintenance window; February 3 is the earliest day after that window, not a contractual promise that the ride will run.
For a family staying at the resort for multiple days, the difference might be worth changing which day is assigned to Tokyo Disneyland. If one day is before January 6 and another is inside the closure, put Disneyland first if the classic Peter Pan ride is a must-do. But do not swap a park ticket or hotel reservation until you understand the applicable change and cancellation conditions. The economic cost of reshuffling an entire trip can exceed the benefit of experiencing one short ride.
A visitor traveling from overseas may be choosing between a single Disneyland day and a DisneySea day. In that case, consider the trip’s overall priorities. Someone who values vintage Fantasyland attractions may still prefer Disneyland even during the closure. Someone traveling expressly for an immersive Peter Pan adventure could be more interested in the DisneySea attraction—but must buy admission to that different park and verify its own operating schedule.
Other Tokyo Disneyland closures during the same period
The official park maintenance listing shows other attractions with early-2027 closure windows that may overlap your visit. At the time of this review, it lists Jungle Cruise: Wildlife Expeditions from January 6 through March 31, Splash Mountain from January 7 through February 4, and Haunted Mansion from January 8 through February 4. These are operator-published schedules, not independent predictions about refurbishment completion.
This makes the Peter Pan closure more significant for certain visitors than a single unavailable ride might suggest. A group that expected several classic experiences in one afternoon could find multiple priorities temporarily inaccessible. Conversely, the park contains many other attractions and entertainment offerings, and the attractions that remain open should be evaluated on their own current descriptions rather than guessed from historical schedules.
It is worth making a small “must ride / would enjoy / optional” list. Mark each attraction against the closure page. Then build flexibility around weather, performance calendars and queue variation. A plan with alternatives is more resilient than a rigid minute-by-minute schedule.
Better alternatives for different kinds of visitors
If the attraction’s appeal is gentle fantasy storytelling, explore other Fantasyland offerings listed in the official Tokyo Disneyland attraction directory. Filter for ride type and height or access restrictions, and read the current operating details. Do not assume that a neighboring attraction will be open merely because it is not listed in an older travel blog.
If the main attraction is Disney character immersion, devote time to character experiences, themed areas, shopping or scheduled entertainment that is actually available on your day. These can preserve the spirit of the trip without pretending they are substitutes for the ride itself. Some guests will prefer to spend the recovered time on a longer headliner; others may value an unhurried lunch and a park exploration that is less vulnerable to queues.
If the trip is built around Peter Pan specifically, Tokyo DisneySea’s Never Land Adventure may appear attractive. But it is not the same ride: it is a 3D boat-based experience in Fantasy Springs, with different restrictions and a different length. Tokyo Disney Resort’s DisneySea attraction page is the reliable way to compare them. Admission, access arrangements and the day’s capacity remain separate questions.
Parents should also avoid overstating the value of a replacement to children. “Another attraction has pirates” does not make it the planned Peter Pan experience. Setting expectations before entering the park is often more effective than negotiating disappointment in a crowded queue area.
Are refunds or ticket changes automatic?
The announcement of an attraction’s temporary closure does not itself demonstrate that every guest is entitled to a ticket refund or a date change. Theme-park tickets ordinarily grant admission subject to operating conditions, not a binding guarantee that every individual ride will operate. Actual ticket terms, package conditions and any operator-specific accommodation policy govern what can be changed.
Before buying or modifying a pass, review the official Tokyo Disney Resort ticket and reservations guidance and any reseller’s terms. A third-party package might combine transport, hotel rooms and tickets under separate cancellation rules. You should not rely on the statement “ride closed” as a universal reason for a penalty-free cancellation.
If your booking is complex, write down the name of the supplier, reservation reference, exact park date and type of admission. Seek a written answer before paying a change fee. This is particularly important if you plan to move only one day of a multi-day trip and keep the remainder unchanged.
Does Disney Premier Access help during the closure?
No paid queue-management product can make an attraction operate while it is closed. Disney Premier Access is a separate, paid tool for eligible operating experiences; eligibility and availability can change. The official Premier Access guide explains that places may sell out and that the price does not include park admission. It should not be marketed to families as a guaranteed workaround for a published maintenance closure.
The app can nevertheless be useful for other attractions and live operating information. If a ride is unavailable, remove it from the day’s queue-management plan and redirect attention to attractions genuinely offered that day. Check the current product terms before purchasing any additional access.
How to build a more reliable 2027 itinerary
Start with the official attraction closure list rather than the social-media version of it. Choose a date, read the list for the correct park, then check the pages for the two or three attractions most important to your group. If several favorites overlap with closures, compare another travel day, but preserve buffer time and cost limits.
Once you have a provisional itinerary, check whether your whole group can experience the alternatives. A family with a toddler and grandparents may have different needs from a group of teenagers. Ride seating rules, dark environments, height restrictions and walking distances deserve attention before buying optional upgrades.
A week before departure, look at the operator’s park calendar and attraction pages again. On the morning of your visit, follow current app information and staff instructions. Write down a backup plan that does not depend on a single ride reopening on the first conceivable day.
Quick visitor questions
Is Peter Pan’s Flight shutting permanently? The published notice says temporary closure January 6–February 2, 2027. It does not announce permanent removal.
Is it in Tokyo Disneyland or DisneySea? Peter Pan’s Flight is in Tokyo Disneyland’s Fantasyland. DisneySea has the separate Never Land Adventure.
Can I ride on February 2? The current listing includes February 2 in the closure window. Do not plan on riding that day.
Is February 3 the official reopening day? It is the first day after the presently announced closure period, assuming the dates are unchanged. Confirm the park’s live information rather than treating operation as guaranteed.
Should I change my trip? That depends on how important this specific ride is compared with hotel, flights, admission and other attractions. For most travelers, adjusting priorities within the same park is the lower-risk first option.
Final planning advice
This news is not a farewell to Peter Pan’s Flight. It is a defined, temporary gap in the operating calendar. The useful response is to check your exact visit date, compare the rides your family actually cares about and keep a realistic alternative ready. Tokyo Disneyland can still be an appealing destination during the listed closure; the difference between an enjoyable trip and a frustrating one may simply be accurate expectations.
Discover more from The Economy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Opinion
Rolex Perpetual Market Value 2026: Why Luxury Watches Remain a Top Alternative Asset
Key Takeaways
- Rolex’s secondary market rose approximately 7.9% year-over-year as of 2026 (per WatchCharts data) — trailing Patek Philippe (+16.2%) and Tudor (+11.4%) but still outperforming Audemars Piguet (+3.4%).
- Rolex raised U.S. retail prices 4–9% in January 2026 (steel models ~5.6%, gold models ~8.7%), narrowing the historical gap between retail and pre-owned pricing.
- Not every model appreciates: steel sports references (Submariner, GMT-Master II, Daytona) have held value far better than two-tone or widely available dress references like the standard Datejust.
- The Lady-Datejust posted the sharpest 2026 gain among tracked collections — up 22.73%, from roughly $9,269 to $11,376 — driven by demand for smaller, “everyday luxury” watches.
- Gold’s rise past $2,400/oz has directly lifted the investment case for Rolex’s precious-metal references (Day-Date, Sky-Dweller, Yacht-Master).
The Model-by-Model Picture
| Category | 2026 Trend |
|---|---|
| Lady-Datejust | +22.73% (strongest performer among tracked collections) |
| Steel sports models (Submariner, GMT-Master II) | Held value well; corrected from 2022 peak but stabilized above retail |
| Daytona | Corrected from highs above $50,000 to the mid-$30,000s; still among the most sought-after references |
| Two-tone/widely available Datejust | Flat to negative — “holds value” is an overstatement for this category |
| Gold references (Day-Date, Sky-Dweller) | Lifted by gold’s rise above $2,400/oz |
Why the “Rolex Always Appreciates” Myth Is Fading
The pandemic-era boom pushed some references — the Daytona above all — to speculative highs disconnected from historical norms. Since the March 2022 peak, steel sports models have compressed meaningfully, and dealers who bought inventory near the top have in some cases faced 20–40% markdowns on liquidation. The lesson for 2026 buyers: Rolex as a category is not a monolith. Value retention depends heavily on specific reference, condition, and whether the piece comes with box and papers (“full set”).
What’s Actually Driving 2026 Strength
- Retail price increases raise the floor. When a new Submariner retails at $10,050 (up from $9,500), a pre-owned example at $11,000–$12,000 suddenly represents a smaller premium — narrowing the gap without secondary prices actually moving.
- Supply discipline remains Rolex’s core lever. The brand has never confirmed production numbers, and secondary-market premiums remain entirely a function of Rolex’s own manufacturing decisions — a risk factor as much as a support.
- Certified Pre-Owned rollout. Rolex’s now fully rolled-out CPO program has changed how buyers transact in the used market, adding a layer of brand-verified legitimacy that supports pricing.
The Case for Rolex as a Portfolio Diversifier
Financial advisors increasingly frame luxury watches not as a replacement for equities or bonds, but as a tangible, historically low-correlation diversifier — one that carries its own risks (illiquidity, condition-dependent pricing, no yield) but has demonstrated multi-decade resilience for specific references.
Is Rolex a good investment in 2026?
It depends heavily on the specific reference. Steel sports models like the Submariner and Daytona have held or grown in value; two-tone and widely available dress models generally have not. Overall, Rolex’s secondary market rose about 7.9% year-over-year in 2026, trailing Patek Philippe but ahead of Audemars Piguet.
Discover more from The Economy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
-
Markets & Finance10 months agoTop 15 Stocks for Investment in 2026 in PSX: Your Complete Guide to Pakistan’s Best Investment Opportunities
-
Analysis9 months agoJohor’s Investment Boom: The Hidden Costs Behind Malaysia’s Most Ambitious Economic Surge
-
Analysis9 months agoTop 10 Stocks for Investment in PSX for Quick Returns in 2026
-
Banks10 months agoBest Investments in Pakistan 2026: Top 10 Low-Price Shares and Long-Term Picks for the PSX
-
Analysis9 months agoBrazil’s Rare Earth Race: US, EU, and China Compete for Critical Minerals as Tensions Rise
-
Investment10 months agoTop 10 Mutual Fund Managers in Pakistan for Investment in 2026: A Comprehensive Guide for Optimal Returns
-
Global Economy10 months ago15 Most Lucrative Sectors for Investment in Pakistan: A 2025 Data-Driven Analysis
-
Global Economy10 months agoPakistan’s Export Goldmine: 10 Game-Changing Markets Where Pakistani Businesses Are Winning Big in 2025
