Banks
The Remaking of Global Banking: Why 2025’s Winners Signal a Seismic Shift in Financial Power
How DBS and HBL’s Historic Victories Reveal the New Architecture of 21st Century Finance
When DBS Bank claimed its third Global Bank of the Year title from The Banker in December 2025, defeating 294 competing institutions, the Singapore-based giant didn’t just win an award. It marked the moment when the tectonic plates beneath global finance shifted irreversibly eastward—and when traditional Western banking supremacy became historical footnote rather than contemporary reality.
But here’s what the champagne celebrations in Marina Bay and the perfunctory congratulations from New York missed: DBS’s achievement, along with its capture of Asia Bank of the Year, Singapore Bank of the Year, and Investment Bank of the Year titles, represents far more than institutional excellence. It signals the emergence of a new banking paradigm where artificial intelligence deployment, digital-first infrastructure, and emerging market agility trump legacy balance sheets and century-old brand prestige.
Meanwhile, 6,000 miles west in Karachi, another revolution quietly unfolded. HBL’s recognition as Pakistan’s best bank, achieving record profit before tax of Rs 120.3 billion ($431.9 million)—a 6.9% increase year-over-year—tells an equally compelling story about resilience, innovation under constraint, and the surprising dynamism of frontier market banking in 2025.
These dual narratives—one from Asia’s most sophisticated financial hub, another from a nation navigating economic stabilization—illuminate the defining question of our era: What does banking excellence actually mean when the rules of engagement have fundamentally changed?
The Digital Dividend: Why Traditional Banks Are Playing Catch-Up
Let’s confront an uncomfortable truth that establishment banking would prefer remained unspoken: DBS’s 18.0% return on equity in 2024, achieved alongside an SGD 11.4 billion ($8.4 billion) net profit, didn’t emerge from conventional banking wisdom. It resulted from a deliberate, decade-long dismantling of every assumption that defined 20th-century financial services.
Consider the numbers that should alarm every legacy institution. By 2030, generative AI will be fully integrated into every aspect of banking, with the technology contributing up to $2 trillion to the global economy through innovative strategies and improved efficiency. DBS has already deployed AI in approximately 420 use cases across its operations, from customer support via chatbots to private banking personalization platforms, generating economic value exceeding SGD 750 million in 2024—more than double the previous year.
This isn’t incremental improvement. This is categorical transformation.
The conventional banking playbook—physical branches as trust anchors, relationship managers as revenue drivers, legacy systems as necessary evils—has become actively counterproductive. Scale is emerging as the ultimate competitive advantage, with the largest institutions leveraging unmatched efficiencies, technological innovation, and global reach to outpace competitors. But here’s the twist: scale no longer correlates with geographic footprint or century-old establishment pedigree.
DBS operates in 19 markets. JPMorgan Chase, by comparison, has operations across more than 100 countries. Yet DBS has captured nine global ‘Best Bank’ awards from leading financial publications since 2018, a frequency that would have been inconceivable a generation ago for an Asian regional player.
The explanation? Digital architecture as competitive moat.
Seventy-five percent of banks with over $100 billion in assets are expected to fully integrate AI strategies by 2025, but integration depth matters exponentially more than adoption announcement. DBS didn’t bolt AI onto legacy infrastructure—it reconstructed banking from first principles with AI as foundational layer, not cosmetic upgrade.
Pakistan’s Paradox: Excellence Amid Economic Turbulence
If DBS represents banking’s aspirational future, Pakistan’s 2025 landscape reveals something equally instructive: how institutions achieve excellence despite—perhaps because of—economic constraint.
Pakistan’s economy expanded by 2.7% in fiscal year 2025, with inflation declining sharply to 4.7% during the first ten months—down from 26% in the previous year. This macroeconomic stabilization, achieved through disciplined fiscal consolidation and tight monetary policy under the IMF’s Extended Fund Facility, created the operating environment where banking excellence could emerge.
Yet the numbers tell a more complex story than simple recovery narrative. Pakistan’s banking sector aggregate profits soared beyond Rs 600 billion in 2025, with tax contributions exceeding Rs 650 billion. This isn’t accident or windfall—it’s strategic positioning within a transforming economy.
HBL achieved record profit before tax of Rs 120.3 billion ($431.9 million), earning per share surging to Rs 39.85 ($0.14), while contributing Rs 62.5 billion to the national treasury. These metrics demonstrate profitability, certainly, but more critically they reveal institutional capacity to navigate volatility that would cripple less adaptive organizations.
Meezan Bank, as Pakistan’s foremost Islamic bank, achieved unprecedented profit of Rs 101.5 billion, with pre-tax profits recorded at Rs 222 billion and substantial tax contribution of Rs 121 billion. This performance occurred within Pakistan’s constitutional mandate requiring shift to Riba-free banking system by 2028, positioning Sharia-compliant institutions for structural advantage as regulatory landscape transforms.
The Pakistan banking story illuminates a crucial insight: constraint breeds innovation when institutions choose adaptation over entrenchment. The banking sector contributed approximately 35% to the KSE-100 Index’s historic rally from 50,000 to 150,000 points since June 2023, demonstrating how financial sector dynamism can catalyze broader economic confidence.
The Technology Arms Race: Where Winners Pull Away
Here’s where the 2025 banking excellence narrative becomes genuinely consequential for industry trajectory: the technology gap between leaders and laggards isn’t narrowing—it’s accelerating toward irreversibility.
DBS surpassed its goal of contributing €300 billion to sustainable finance by 2025, a year ahead of schedule, but this achievement masks the more significant development. The French banking giant Societe Generale, which won Global Finance’s World’s Best Bank designation while generating €4.2 billion in group net income (up 69% from previous year) on €26.8 billion in revenue (up 6.7%), demonstrated that multiple institutions can achieve excellence through different pathways.
Yet technology deployment remains the differentiating factor separating good from exceptional.
AI will contribute $2 trillion to the global economy through banking innovation and efficiency improvements, but this value creation won’t distribute evenly. More than half of banks now have mature cloud programs, with respondents planning to double the share of applications on cloud in next three years from 30-40% today to up to 70%, creating divergence between cloud-native operations and legacy system constraints.
Consider the implications. Generative AI is reversing the impersonal nature of digital banking, creating emotionally engaging experiences that feel like personalized service of the past. Banks achieving this transformation—DBS prominent among them—create customer experiences that legacy institutions literally cannot replicate without wholesale infrastructure replacement.
The technology gap manifests in every dimension of operations. Generative AI will drive ‘waste out’ by automating manual processes like risk and compliance testing, reducing costs by up to 60% in the next two to three years. Institutions capturing this efficiency gain compound advantages across customer acquisition costs, operational margins, and innovation velocity.
Pakistan’s leading banks demonstrate that technology adoption isn’t geography-dependent. BankIslami, awarded Best Bank of the Year in mid-sized banks category, pioneered deploying biometric ATMs and introducing Pakistan’s first Islamic digital banking solution, proving that innovation can emerge from unexpected quarters when institutions prioritize transformation over tradition.
The Regulatory Reckoning: How Policy Shapes Excellence
Banking excellence in 2025 cannot be understood separately from regulatory environment—and here again, we see bifurcation between enabling frameworks and constraining structures.
Global banking industry operated within environment of significant complexity in past year, with economic headwinds, high interest rates, persistent inflation, and geopolitical tensions all shaping banking strategies worldwide. Yet regulatory response varied dramatically across jurisdictions, creating asymmetric competitive landscapes.
Pakistan’s Finance Act 2025 drew significant controversy due to stringent taxation measures and expanded enforcement powers granted to Federal Board of Revenue, with key provisions allowing arrest of individuals without prior notice. This regulatory intensity creates operational friction that banks must navigate while maintaining profitability—a constraint that simultaneously burdens institutions and forces operational excellence.
Meanwhile, Singapore’s regulatory approach fostered the environment enabling DBS’s leadership. DBS has been accorded ‘Safest Bank in Asia’ award by Global Finance for 17 consecutive years from 2009 to 2025, reflecting not just institutional risk management but regulatory framework supporting prudent growth over reckless expansion.
The divergence extends to emerging technology regulation. Regulatory evolution will bring more specific AI requirements focusing on algorithmic transparency, standardized risk frameworks, and enhanced consumer protection. Jurisdictions that balance innovation enablement with consumer protection create competitive advantage for domestic institutions—those that overregulate or underregulate both create vulnerabilities.
Pakistan’s 26th constitutional amendment mandating shift to Riba-free banking system by 2028 represents regulatory transformation with profound competitive implications. Islamic banks positioned for this transition—Meezan Bank, BankIslami, and others—gain structural advantages as regulatory tailwinds accelerate their growth trajectories.
The Profitability Puzzle: Why Returns Diverge
Understanding 2025’s banking excellence requires examining the profitability architecture separating exceptional from mediocre performers.
DBS achieved net profit of SGD 11.4 billion with return on equity of 18.0%, one of the highest among developed market banks globally. This ROE—sustained across multiple years—reflects not cyclical advantage but structural superiority in capital deployment.
Compare this against broader industry dynamics. Pakistan’s banking sector recorded highest-ever profit after tax at $1.15 billion in first half of 2025, a 19% year-on-year increase, demonstrating that profitability growth opportunities exist across development stages and market sophistication levels.
Yet profitability sources matter critically. Limited private sector lending remains concern in Pakistan, as banks continue to rely heavily on government securities for profits. This revenue model—lucrative in high-interest-rate environment—creates vulnerability as monetary policy normalizes and yields compress.
United Bank Limited witnessed 34% surge in profits reaching Rs 75.7 billion, with pre-tax profits escalating to Rs 150 billion and significant strides in expanding Islamic banking operations across KPK and Balochistan. This growth trajectory reflects diversification across business lines and geographic markets—the sustainable profitability model versus concentration risk.
DBS’s profitability architecture offers instructive contrast. Total income rose 10% to SGD 22.3 billion, with net interest income increasing 6% due to balance sheet growth deployed into low-risk securities amid tepid loan growth, while non-interest income was star performer as market clarity buoyed investor confidence and fueled wealth management activity. Diversified revenue streams—interest income, wealth management fees, treasury operations—create resilience that monoline institutions cannot replicate.
The profitability lesson from 2025’s excellence winners: sustainable returns emerge from diversified revenue streams, operational efficiency through technology, and prudent risk management—not from concentrated bets on single revenue sources or excessive risk-taking.
The Wealth Management Inflection: Where Value Migrates
Perhaps no trend better explains 2025’s banking excellence pattern than wealth management emergence as primary value driver.
BBVA claims title of World’s Best Corporate Bank for third consecutive year, expanding market share and deal leadership during 2024, leading 86 deals across telecommunications, energy, infrastructure, consumer goods and services for total volume of €5.16 billion. Yet even corporate banking excellence increasingly depends on ancillary wealth management capabilities for high-net-worth executives and family offices.
The numbers reveal the magnitude of this shift. DBS serves over 18.4 million Consumer Banking/Wealth Management customers, but customer count tells incomplete story—revenue per customer in wealth management segments dwarfs traditional retail banking metrics.
DBS expects commercial book non-interest income to grow in high-single digits led by wealth management fees and treasury customer sales, positioning wealth management as primary growth engine even as interest income stabilizes. This strategic reorientation—from balance sheet size toward fee-based services—represents fundamental reconception of banking value proposition.
Pakistan’s market demonstrates similar dynamics at different sophistication level. Banking sector accounts for $15.12 billion of PSX’s $64.76 billion total market capitalization—representing about 23% of overall market, yet wealth management penetration remains nascent compared to developed markets, representing enormous growth runway for institutions positioned to capture affluent segment.
The wealth management inflection creates winner-take-most dynamics. Institutions with digital platforms enabling seamless omnichannel experiences, AI-powered personalization, and comprehensive product suites capture disproportionate market share. Those lacking these capabilities face commoditization pressure and margin compression in traditional banking services.
The Geopolitical Dimension: How Power Shifts Reshape Finance
Banking excellence in 2025 cannot be divorced from broader geopolitical realignment—and here the story becomes genuinely fascinating.
Geopolitical disruptions are reshaping trade, technology, and finance, with three factors—security, emerging resource and industrial battlegrounds, and ‘transactionalism’—testing globalization’s staying power. These forces create asymmetric opportunities and vulnerabilities across banking systems.
DBS’s position in Singapore—financial Switzerland of Asia with relationships spanning both Western and Eastern spheres—provides geopolitical optionality that institutions headquartered in explicitly aligned jurisdictions cannot replicate. This strategic ambiguity, combined with operational excellence, creates competitive advantage as global trade patterns fragment and regionalize.
Pakistan’s banking sector faces different geopolitical calculus. IMF’s 2025 Governance and Corruption Diagnostic Assessment estimates Pakistan’s economy loses 5-6.5 percent of GDP to corruption due to entrenched ‘elite capture,’ where influential groups shape public policy for their own benefit. This structural challenge constrains banking sector development even as individual institutions achieve excellence within imperfect ecosystem.
Yet geopolitical realignment creates opportunities alongside challenges. Pakistan’s exports have declined from 16 percent of GDP in 1990s to around 10 percent in 2024, leaving growth dependent on debt and remittance-driven consumption which underlies Pakistan’s recurrent boom-bust cycles. Banking institutions facilitating export sector transformation position themselves for structural tailwinds if policy reforms materialize.
The geopolitical lesson: banking excellence requires navigation of political economy realities that extend far beyond institution-level decisions. Winners in 2025 demonstrated not just operational superiority but strategic positioning within geopolitical landscapes enabling—rather than constraining—their growth trajectories.
The Sustainability Imperative: Beyond Greenwashing to Strategic Advantage
Banking excellence in 2025 increasingly correlates with sustainability leadership—not as reputational exercise but as strategic positioning for regulatory and market shifts.
Societe Generale surpassed its goal of contributing €300 billion to sustainable finance by 2025, a year ahead of schedule, demonstrating that sustainability commitments, when genuine, create business development opportunities rather than merely compliance costs.
DBS committed SGD 89 billion in sustainable financing net of repayments, representing substantial capital deployment toward transition finance, renewable energy, and climate-resilient infrastructure. This isn’t altruism—it’s recognition that sustainable finance represents among fastest-growing banking segments with improving risk-adjusted returns.
The sustainability shift creates competitive separation. BBVA led €383 million project financing of Repsol Renovables’ Gallo portfolio, a 777-megawatt solar and battery storage facility spanning Texas and New Mexico, while directing €51.1 billion into sustainable financing throughout year. Institutions building capabilities in sustainability assessment, transition finance structuring, and climate risk management capture market share in high-growth segments.
Pakistan’s context reveals sustainability’s differentiated impact across development stages. Pakistan’s recent floods imposed significant human costs and economic losses, dampening growth prospects and adding pressure on macroeconomic stability. Banking institutions offering climate-resilient lending products and disaster recovery financing demonstrate sustainability’s immediate, practical relevance beyond long-term carbon neutrality commitments.
The sustainability imperative separates 2025’s winners from institutions merely mimicking ESG rhetoric without operational transformation.
What 2026 Holds: The Acceleration Ahead
As 2025 closes, the trajectory for banking excellence becomes simultaneously clearer and more volatile. Several forces will shape which institutions sustain leadership and which fall behind.
First, AI deployment will separate winners from losers with increasing finality. Only 8% of banks were developing generative AI systematically in 2024, with 78% having tactical approach, but as banks move from pilots to execution, more are redefining strategic approach to service expansion including agentic AI. The institutions moving from experimentation to industrialization will compound advantages impossible for laggards to overcome without wholesale transformation.
Second, regulatory divergence will accelerate. Regulatory evolution will bring more specific AI requirements focusing on algorithmic transparency, standardized risk frameworks, and enhanced consumer protection, creating asymmetric compliance burdens that favor institutions with mature governance frameworks and technology infrastructure.
Third, macroeconomic volatility will test institutional resilience. Pakistan’s growth is projected to remain at 3.0 percent in FY26 due to flood impacts on agriculture sector before picking up in medium term as stability and reforms enhance growth prospects. Economic shocks separate well-capitalized, diversified institutions from fragile competitors dependent on benign conditions.
DBS expects net interest income to be slightly higher than 2024 levels as impact of lower interest rates is more than offset by loan growth, with commercial book non-interest income growing in high-single digits and pretax profits around record 2024 levels. This guidance reflects confidence born from operational excellence rather than optimistic assumptions about external conditions.
The banking excellence template for 2026 and beyond: technology-enabled operations, diversified revenue streams, prudent risk management, sustainability leadership, and strategic positioning within favorable regulatory and geopolitical landscapes. Institutions possessing these attributes will thrive. Those lacking them will struggle regardless of legacy brand strength or balance sheet size.
The Uncomfortable Truth
Let’s return to where we began: DBS’s third Global Bank of the Year award and HBL’s Pakistan leadership aren’t just institutional success stories. They’re harbingers of comprehensive restructuring of global financial architecture.
The uncomfortable truth that establishment banking must confront: traditional competitive advantages—century-old brands, physical branch networks, legacy relationship management approaches—have transformed from assets into liabilities. The future belongs to institutions that rebuilt themselves from first principles with technology as foundation rather than ornament.
DBS’s exceptional performance stood out among 294 participating banks, underscoring its sustained leadership and profound impact in global financial industry. This wasn’t victory through marginal superiority but categorical difference in institutional DNA.
For Pakistan’s banking sector, the excellence achieved in 2025 demonstrates that frontier markets can produce world-class institutions when leaders prioritize transformation over incrementalism. HBL remains undisputed leader as Pakistan’s best bank, demonstrating standout financial growth and continuous improvement in digital space—proving that excellence transcends market sophistication when institutions embrace change.
The question confronting every banking CEO as 2025 closes isn’t whether to transform—it’s whether they possess courage to dismantle organizational structures and cultural assumptions that delivered past success but guarantee future irrelevance.
DBS and HBL didn’t win Bank of the Year 2025 awards by being incrementally better. They won by being fundamentally different. That’s the lesson that separates next decade’s survivors from its casualties.
The remaking of global banking isn’t coming. It has arrived. The only question remaining: which institutions recognize this reality quickly enough to adapt, and which will insist on defending obsolete models until market forces render the decision moot?
Excellence in banking—real excellence, not the cosmetic variety celebrated in aspirational mission statements—requires confronting these uncomfortable realities. The 2025 winners demonstrated this courage. The 2026 winners will be those who learn from their example.
Abdul Rahman is Senior Political Economy Columnist covering global financial systems, emerging market dynamics, and regulatory policy. His analysis has appeared in leading English Newspapers and Magazines .
Data Sources: The Banker (Financial Times), Global Finance Magazine, Euromoney, World Bank, International Monetary Fund, Asian Development Bank, State Bank of Pakistan, DBS Annual Reports, Accenture Banking Research, McKinsey Global Banking Studies, IBM Institute for Business Value, CFA Society Pakistan.